Not By Works

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
May 22, 2020
403
127
43
None of you still haven't addressed the fact that the WRITERS of the KJV Bible claimed it was not a Bible.
Not my area of expertise. I don't use the KJV. I believe it to be good, but others are better. This PARAPHASE claim is a new one to me.

Aside:
Mark 16:9-20 not found in older manuscripts (story of Mary Magdalene)
John 5:4 only found in KJV, NKJV and NASB
John 7:53-8:11 Passage omitted in the critical text. See Jesus and the woman taken in adultery

... some other minor quirks
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,054
13,064
113
58
So can we conclude those who believe all future sins are forgiven and they need not confess or repent of anything are not genuine Christians?
Notice that - If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness (vs. 9) is IN CONTRAST TO - If we say that we have no sin, (present tense) we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us (vs. 8) and - If we say that we have not sinned, (past tense) we make him a liar, and his word is not in us (vs. 10). Believers speak the same/acknowledge/agree with God's perspective about their sins and have a settled recognition and ongoing acknowledgment that one is a sinner in need of cleansing and forgiveness.

Although believers can repent about other specific things, to repent and believe the gospel unto salvation is not a repeated act. Jesus is the door. (John 10:9) He is not a revolving door.

By the way, seals can be and are easily broken.
Chapter and verse please. Do you disagree with sealed until the redemption of the purchased possession/unto the day of redemption? (Ephesians 1:13-14; 4:30)

Strong's Concordance
sphragizó: to seal
Original Word: σφραγίζω
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: sphragizó
Phonetic Spelling: (sfrag-id'-zo)
Definition: to seal
Usage: I seal, set a seal upon.
HELPS Word-studies

4972 sphragízō (from 4973 /sphragís, "a seal") – properly, to seal (affix) with a signet ring or other instrument to stamp (a roller or seal), i.e. to attest ownership, authorizing (validating) what is sealed.

4972 /sphragízō ("to seal") signifies ownership and the full security carried by the backing (full authority) of the owner. "Sealing" in the ancient world served as a "legal signature" which guaranteed the promise (contents) of what was sealed.

https://biblehub.com/greek/4972.htm
 
May 22, 2020
403
127
43
You know what @Fastfredy0 you are not so pleasant as your avatar would have us believe.
Well, I am pleasant to the degree that I don't call someone else unpleasant.

Did you come to this thread to red x every post that disagrees with your Calvinist view... that is very troll like behaviour.

We have had many trolls on this thread and that is exactly what they do time and time again,
I place red "X"s on things I disagree with. It is not me being a troll, rather; it is probably an issue of someone's pride being hurt. (IMO)
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,121
26,198
113
I am used to answers with little to no foundation ... answers like, "you are wrong because your interpretation is incorrect". Like dah, I assumed that to be true. I was hoping for corroborating evidence which I seldom get. ... or instead of an answer to my question I will get a question instead .... or, I will get back to you.

Aside: Judges1318's theology was off (IMO), but at least he responded to questions and gave some scripture. Gee, even Micaiah-imla gets credit for that. She at least puts up an argument.
You did not respond to my pointing out to you that Romans one says nothing
about the laws being written on people's hearts, as you had erroneously claimed.


Here are the original posts, though I edited yours down to the questionable content.


Yes, they go to hell. (Faith cometh by hearing... they have not heard...therefore they do not have faith ... therefore hell)
Yes, they are judged by their conscious. Romans 1 talks about God's law being written on their hearts and therefore they are without excuse.
No. Romans 1 says they are without excuse because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator, suppressing the truth by their wickedness. Romans 1 says that since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. It says they knew God but did not give Him glory. Nothing about the law being written on people's hearts in Romans 1, nor is the law even mentioned.
 
May 23, 2020
1,558
313
83
How is praying suffering? We are talking about suffering let us stay focused please.

No, you did not write the verse but you should be able to support your position and state a yes or a no?

So then according you and your understanding of that verse "suffering" is necessary to receive the promise of salvation?
We were talking conditions for promises. God has them. It would be wise for the follower to learn what these are. They are not works but they might require work. They are such that they do not earn the matter but without them the matter is not granted.

For example, refuse to forgive others and God won’t forgive your sins. This motivates us to forgive if for no other loftier reason.

Now as to your question. If we are required to suffer for a time by Him, the suffer we must. Is it required for salvation? There is no one concrete law that describes the state of obedience to God’s will so that one is saved or lost. We are not under law. And so no man can give you a set of rules to follow to be saved from sin and hell. The good news is we can be.

The recognition of sin and the need for forgiveness is for every sinner. What Jesus asked of individuals after that varies. Some were told to follow him. Some were told not to do so but go home. One was told to sell everything. One was told he needed rove bornfrom above. His path for each can vary in outward steps.

So if suffering for Him is asked of one, one must. If not, then not. Where is salvation lost? Same as a marriage it’s not lost by one failure but a series of abandonment refusing to return.

I’ll give you another conditional promise that is not commonly know. “God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble. So humble yourselves....”. There are many more.

Learn the conditions (none are works per se), meet them and He will fulfill His part more than one could imagine.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
You really believe you can damage other people in your sin and repentance or grief for what you did is not a part of the christian walk? Jesus told Peter to forgive those who repent and ask forgiveness 70x7 times. He also taught if you bring a gift to God and remember someone has something against you, to and make it right (settle it.) Shall I look up all the places where repent is preached? You really thing God cares not what your sin does to others?
How does connect to my question....boy you sure like to accuse of things I never once denied.

All you do is reveal yourself to be deceitful in a discussion. That is on you.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
See he is not a true Calvinist. He thinks salvation can be lost
Another false accusation? Nothing in what I stated claims, implies nor shows I bekieve in loss of salvation. You really need to read better and stop with these false conclusions brother.

I affirm eternal security. Always have.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
This statement does not explain the WHY one is saved. Specifically, you haven't shown here that faith is via FREE WILL or God's selecting whom would be saved.
John 6:44 No man comes unto me, except the Father which has sent me draw (1) to draw, drag off 2) metaph., to draw by inward power, lead, impel] him., he infers it to be an incontrovertible fact, that the hearts of believers are so effectually governed from above, that they follow with undeviating affection.

The Lord draws men by their own wills; wills, however, which he himself has produced - viz. that the grace offered by the Lord is not merely one which every individual has full liberty of choosing to receive or reject, but a grace which produces in the heart both choice and will: so that all the good works which follow after are its fruit and effect; the only will which yields obedience being the will which grace itself has made.

Arminians would say the Spirit's work of conviction is the same both in the converted and in unconverted, that which distinguishes the one class from the other is that the former yielded to His strivings whereas the latter resist them. But if this were the case then the Christian would have ground for boasting and self-glorying over his cooperation with the Spirit; but this would flatly contradict Ephesians 2:8 "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God."
I am not Arminian so please from now one speak to me. Not to what a group of other people believe.

Yes god does drag. He drug Judas and in the end Judas said no

The order of salvation is a logical order, not a chronological order. Perhaps that is the issue. I don't see this order being a deciding issue for either of us unless one can find scripture to backup the order. I believe I can do so as follows:
1 John 5:1 "Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born [regenerated] of God" ...The verb tense make's John's intention unmistakable: Everyone who goes on believing [present, continuous action] that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God [perfect, completed action with abiding effects]. " Faith is the evidence of new birth, not the cause of it." “has been born” is a passive verb; they are caused to be born by another, that being God. Some Arminian exegetes might object to this interpretation. A means of testing the consistency of the exegesis offered of this passage would be to ask how such a person interprets these words: 1 John 2:29 If you know that he is righteous, you also know that everyone who practices righteousness has been fathered by him. Every consistent Protestant would say, “the reason one practices righteousness is because they have already been born of Him.
Let’s try to Look logically

1. the penalty of sin is death (Rom 6). Which means as long as a person is unjustified or guilty of sin, they are dead.
2. to be freed from the wage of sin is to be justified, or declaired innocent of all sin or to be declaired rightious, in the justice system, this is to be acquired,
3. all through scripture we read we are justified by faith, (Rom 3:28, romans 4 romans 5:1 as just a few,) that we are justified by the blood or redemption (romans 5: 9) and that ultimately we are justified as a gift through grace (Rom 3:24 with titus 3: 7)
4 so since the penalty of sin is death, the penalty must be removed before the gift of life can be granted, otherwise, your still dead.

you can spin it, twist it all you want, the fact is, you have a dead man who is dead on account of his sin, being made alive before his sins are forgiven. This is just flat out wrong

Shouldn't the verse read: Many are called, few are chosen chose (sorry, couldn't resist... minor cheap shot)
whats sad is I come to expect that from many calvinistic people. It must be the way you are brought up? You can’t have a normal open conversation with others unless you can make some cheap shots, yet I know others do it to, it’s sad when anyone does it, and I think it is unchristlike


No need ... the examples were to ensure we have a common understanding of the FAITH aspect of salvation. I believe God changes our heart so we believe and you believe you are given a choice and that it is up to you to believe.
see once again you make a remark that is not true, will you ever stop assuming and making these reasonings you think are true without asking first?

i believe god changed my heart, and because of this, I was able to make a decision to say yes lord, or no lord.


Aside1: I think you are a nice Christian guy with whom I disagree
Aside2: Despite your comment saying I do not answer your questions, I think I have done so for the most part.
Aside3: Our debate, in my opinion, has been civil .. thank you

Question:
Definition of work: activity involving mental or physical effort done in order to achieve a purpose or result.

Given: You believe that you of your own free will must believe (mental effort) to be saved (to achieve a result)
Question: How do you explain that you do NO WORK in order to be saved??????
 
May 22, 2020
403
127
43
Re: Fastfredy0 said: What does this have to do with Satan not believing he is a sinner ?????

Is he not the ring leader of the un redeemed? Head honcho?
Yes, Satan is the ring leader to the unsaved.

That does not mean that Satan's thoughts are their thoughts or vise versa. If you can offer a scripture to disprove this, bring it on. :cool:
 
Apr 5, 2020
2,273
464
83
Because this is ridiculous, Biker.

They weren’t writers, they were translators.

I saw your quote regarding “the kings speech” and your conclusion was so bizarre and off the wall that I didn’t even bother to waste my time on it.


There is a Book from those translators you should read then. And how did they translate when they admit to never reading a Bible to begin with and they were writing down what King James was saying? And when does what King James say equal to God's Holy Word?
 
Apr 5, 2020
2,273
464
83
No they did not!

They were telling us how all translations of the Bible are the word of God, though not all expressing the original in an eloquent way; as when one translates the kings speech into other languages; not all translators will effectively convey his words so eloquently.

They were using the translating of the king’s speech as an example, they were not saying that that’s what they were doing.

They wanted to translate the scriptures in a way as to accurately bring over from the original its eloquence:


English must be your second language!
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Aside1: I think you are a nice Christian guy with whom I disagree
Aside2: Despite your comment saying I do not answer your questions, I think I have done so for the most part.
Aside3: Our debate, in my opinion, has been civil .. thank you

Question:
Definition of work: activity involving mental or physical effort done in order to achieve a purpose or result.

Given: You believe that you of your own free will must believe (mental effort) to be saved (to achieve a result)
Question: How do you explain that you do NO WORK in order to be saved??????
was getting long so I broke it up

i think it is best to let paul explain it to you

Romans 4: 4 What then shall we say that Abraham our father[a] has found according to the flesh? 2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. 3 For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was [b]accounted to him for righteousness.” 4 Now to him who works, the wages are not counted [c]as grace but as debt.

David Celebrates the Same Truth
5 But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness, 6 just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works:

7 “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven,
And whose sins are covered;

8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord shall not impute sin.”
did abraham earn his salvation by faith? Did he merit his salvation by faith? Did he earn a wage (salvation) by faith?

the answer is no, work here is distinguished from living faith, which is declaired not to be a work, and we are made right with God (justified) by faith

so you tell me, how can I merit salvation by work? When Paul here outlines as fact. faith in God is not a work,
 
Apr 5, 2020
2,273
464
83
My point was simply that the Holy Spirit guided my ancestors to what God was revealing to them in their simplistic lives. We do not all have to be professors of linguistics, Arabic, Greek language. I admire those who do so but God will reveal His message in His own way to His own people.


At least some TRUTH is better than NO TRUTH, I would agree!
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I think I'm special, so I think because of this God chose me? Where have I taught this? Will you show me, or, will you stop falsely accusing?

My belief has always been that God chose me based on nothing good in me, 1 Corinthians 1:26-31, which I always quote, as unconditional election which is what I adhere to. (God chooses based on nothing good in us but only because of his purpose counsel, and will.) Also, that he died for the ungodly, Romans 5:8, which shows they are (I am) undeserving. This is grace, unmerited favor.

This is contrary to your belief that God chose you, because he saw you would choose him, which is merited favor, not grace. Grace is unmerited favor.
1. you said god chose you but god rejected others, for he rejected them not even giving them an opportunity to be saved,

in any culture or language, this is declaring you are special while they are not