Thank you Susanna!
My reason for voting for Mrs. Clinton had nothing to do with abortion for one. Abortion was'nt on the ballot.
1.) Support freedom of speech, Trump had reporter's Shot at!
2.) Not one democrat support chaos ? ( who would? lol)
3.)Democrat's don't support the right to bare arm's. Are you serious? We are cocked, locked and ready to rock.
4). Republicans consistently vote for Gay's And put them in Congress.
5.) As far as border's. I don't think that we have to worry about that . All Countries, Including Canada and Mexico have banned us from their Countries. Did You see the signs on the pavements of the UK?
" US citizens Must be accompanied by an Adult to enter the Country." LOL..
Have I answered all your questions? Do you feel better about Dems. now? It's not us. You are your own worst enemy We are just sitting back watching you destroy yourselves and you guy's have been doing a bang up job doing so. For this I thank you....
Democrats oppose freedom of speech, as they have
Your response is liberal denial of factual truth, I will save my time on posting the facts.
Dems have passed so much legislation on restricting and removing guns ownership it's beyond mention, the NRA backs Trump 100%
The democrats in Seattle, Portland, New York, defund the police, riots and chaos unchecked, turning the city over to Thugs.
DEMOCRATS VOTED TO REPEAL FIRST AMENDMENT
By Phil Kerpen
With House Republicans focused on legislation to boost job creation, the Senate is spending its time on an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would repeal the First Amendment with respect to political speech. Democratic Whip Dick Durbin said before the debate even officially began: “I expect a fully partisan vote,” and he was right. So what exactly are all the Senate Democrats for and Republicans against?
Section 1 of the proposed amendment (S. J. Res. 19) says: “Congress and the States may regulate and set reasonable limits on the raising and spending of money by candidates and others to influence elections.”
The key words here are “and others,” meaning anybody Congress chooses to regulate and “to influence elections,” meaning not just express advocacy that calls on voters to support or oppose a candidate, but any communication politicians think might influence an election.
It gives Congress – and the states – the power to restrict paid communications – political speech – about any significant public policy issue with respect to incumbent politicians. Vast swaths of core political speech – much of it wholly unrelated to elections – would be restricted. Politicians would advance controversial policies knowing that any criticism of them could be prohibited.
New York Post
Democrats’ new campaign ‘reforms’ are a war on free speech
By
Rich Lowry
March 11, 2019 | 8:06pm
The same Democrats who can’t abide President Trump’s alleged offenses against the First Amendment passed, as their first priority, a speech-restricting bill opposed by the American Civil Liberties Union.
Trump shouldn’t call the media the “enemy of the people” or inveigh against Jeff Bezos for owning The Washington Post, but Nancy Pelosi’s HR 1, enacted in the House last week, is the true affront to the Constitution.
3
1
3
1
