This Cannot Continue
- Thread starter Roughsoul1991
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The world has m
You could offer it to China,I am sure they would be more than happy to have it on its soil and garner some world prestige. ... see how that works out for the USA?
You could offer it to China,I am sure they would be more than happy to have it on its soil and garner some world prestige. ... see how that works out for the USA?
-
1
-
1
- Show all
E
My grandparents never relied on government for anything and when a pandemic came, two world wars and a great depression they survived.
Sad that people are in debt up to there ears ... but have to have a vacation every other month and then want the government to take care of them when hard times come.
My background is economics and the economy of the USA would have toppled from a large sneeze it was so over leveraged.
Sad that people are in debt up to there ears ... but have to have a vacation every other month and then want the government to take care of them when hard times come.
My background is economics and the economy of the USA would have toppled from a large sneeze it was so over leveraged.
-
1
- Show all
That could change with the stroke of a pen.
Wikipedia: United States withdrawal from the United Nations refers to various proposals for the United States to terminate its membership in the United Nations, where it is one of the founding members and one of the five Permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. These proposals are often motivated by a perceived threat to U.S. sovereignty, or theories that the U.N. is a potential world government.
Alabama congressman Mike Rogers has called to leave the UN.[1] Utah state representative Don Bush, has claimed that many programs by the supranational entity have violated the US Constitution, such as the implementation of the International Court of Justice and the Law of the Sea Treaty, both of which the United States does not currently endorse.[2]
The U.S. withdrew from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in October 2017 and June 2018 respectively.[3][4]
Wikipedia: United States withdrawal from the United Nations refers to various proposals for the United States to terminate its membership in the United Nations, where it is one of the founding members and one of the five Permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. These proposals are often motivated by a perceived threat to U.S. sovereignty, or theories that the U.N. is a potential world government.
Alabama congressman Mike Rogers has called to leave the UN.[1] Utah state representative Don Bush, has claimed that many programs by the supranational entity have violated the US Constitution, such as the implementation of the International Court of Justice and the Law of the Sea Treaty, both of which the United States does not currently endorse.[2]
The U.S. withdrew from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in October 2017 and June 2018 respectively.[3][4]
-
2
- Show all
The host country grants the use of such soil but that is not the same as ownership. Even then, US government seizes land all of the time by use of the eminent domain clause per the US Constitution. Any country, per the Vienna Convention may order the guest country to vacate any embassy at any time. However, you are correct in that while the embassy is occupied by a foreign power it is considered a territory of such power and their rights are protected under International Law.
-
1
- Show all
what are the militias of both sides?
surely you don't mean the feds trump sent in to quell the blm/ antifia attempting an insurrection do you??
i ,mean, how many kkk are out there fighting with blm? i have seen none..
oh, and since u.n. agenda 2030 effects you, you might want to suspend your" no research " policy and look in to it.
surely you don't mean the feds trump sent in to quell the blm/ antifia attempting an insurrection do you??
i ,mean, how many kkk are out there fighting with blm? i have seen none..
oh, and since u.n. agenda 2030 effects you, you might want to suspend your" no research " policy and look in to it.
-
1
- Show all
The UN sits in a treaty signed in 1946, that can be broken and provisions provide for payment of the land at fair market value.
President Trump can restrict travel to the US as was seen in the Iranian UN diplomats.
The UN has considered several times on moving their operation outside if the US
Example: US Leaves UN
US Bans Iran, Russia, China, South Africa, Etc from travel to America on human rights or whatever and the UN is gone, the land is paid for, no more UN
President Trump can restrict travel to the US as was seen in the Iranian UN diplomats.
The UN has considered several times on moving their operation outside if the US
Example: US Leaves UN
US Bans Iran, Russia, China, South Africa, Etc from travel to America on human rights or whatever and the UN is gone, the land is paid for, no more UN
The UN building sits on American Soil under laws governed by (Public Law 357, 80th Congress), provisions in this declaration allow for existing Federal, State, And Local Laws To Apply, The UN Does Govern It's Police and Access.
It can't harbor wanted figures, such as murderers etc from American arrest.
Under Section 6 below, the US could consider the UN building a threat to US security, and restrict "All Foreign Nationals" from it's building.
Section 6 of the Joint Resolution (Public Law 357, 80th Congress)3
Section 6 of the Joint Resolution approving the Headquarters Agreement provides:
“Nothing in the agreement shall be construed as in any way dimiunishing, abridging, or weakening the right of the United States to safeguard its own security and completely to control the entrance of aliens into any territory of the United States other than the headquarters district and its immediate vicinity, as to be defined and fixed in a supplementary agreement between the Government of the United States and the United Nations in pursuance of Section 13(3) (e) [sic]4 of the agreement, and such areas as it is reasonably necessary to traverse in transit between the same and foreign countries …”
It can't harbor wanted figures, such as murderers etc from American arrest.
Under Section 6 below, the US could consider the UN building a threat to US security, and restrict "All Foreign Nationals" from it's building.
Section 6 of the Joint Resolution (Public Law 357, 80th Congress)3
Section 6 of the Joint Resolution approving the Headquarters Agreement provides:
“Nothing in the agreement shall be construed as in any way dimiunishing, abridging, or weakening the right of the United States to safeguard its own security and completely to control the entrance of aliens into any territory of the United States other than the headquarters district and its immediate vicinity, as to be defined and fixed in a supplementary agreement between the Government of the United States and the United Nations in pursuance of Section 13(3) (e) [sic]4 of the agreement, and such areas as it is reasonably necessary to traverse in transit between the same and foreign countries …”
-
1
- Show all