Forgive me but "How does this be biblical? " and yet you read it from? The bible... ok
You're adding error to confusion again, I see. Jesus is not an angel; Hebrews 1 and 2 make that truth abundantly clear.
Anyone who says that is in serious trouble. Even Balaam's donkey would laugh at this absurdity.
Balaam's Ass was an Angel then?
You miss that in Numbers. The Angel of the Lord.
You'll believe what you want to about Angels. Angels are sent from God. Jesus was not an Angel. The only sect that believes that are Jehovah Witnesses.
You're a Jehovah Witness when you claim Jesus was an Angel. Because for Jesus to have been an Angel, that means Jesus Emmanuel was not God.(with us)
Maybe I'm just too full of Body Armour Berry Lemonade and that's why I don't get what you're saying in that second part after your injection of TV talking animals.Like Francis the talking mule or Mr. Ed.?
He communicated the word of God "prophecy" as a messenger . Satan before the fall had that kind of power by the words God put on the lips of that Ass to restrain the madness of a false prophet (Balaam) Ssssss,,atan in the garden turning it into a lying power. Did God really say? look at me and live I lived through it. s s s s s . Why believe in things not seen. Who needs faith ?
Have you searched out the meaning of that parable. Why was it given? How does it support the gospel?
Jesus is not an angel. Jesus is God.I would think Jesus the Chief Apostle(sent one) did the will of the father as a prophet . What would disqualify the Son of man ,Jesus as one of the messengers of God called apostles?
Where is that in Scripture?Clouds represent the unseen representation of God the unseen Lord.
No; the Trinity is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Look it up in any Christian theology text.God is not a man . God is Spirit. God is light. God is Love (The trinity)
It's not a parable.Like Francis the talking mule or Mr. Ed.?
He communicated the word of God "prophecy" as a messenger . Satan before the fall had that kind of power by the words God put on the lips of that Ass to restrain the madness of a false prophet (Balaam) Ssssss,,atan in the garden turning it into a lying power. Did God really say? look at me and live I lived through it. s s s s s . Why believe in things not seen. Who needs faith ?
Have you searched out the meaning of that parable. Why was it given? How does it support the gospel?
It's not a parable.
Says the guy who didn't finish high school to the man who has an earned degree from a respected seminary.It would seem you have no idea what a parable is and what is the purpose of speaking them and not without not a peep
Says the guy who didn't finish high school to the man who has an earned degree from a respected seminary.
smh...
Garee, you are right in one aspect: being educated doesn't necessarily mean that I have correct understanding of Scripture. However, it is wrong to assume that I don't because I'm educated, or that you do because you aren't. How about you just don't make assumptions at all regarding what I know and don't know.With all due respect to your writing ability.
Fifth grade was the hardest three years of my life.
He teaches simply ones and few of the wise of this world. Saul the Christian murderer had all the privy credentials. Best teacher, a member of the Jewish tribe, had the right Hebrew tongue and had a great zeal... Sadly falsely as a serial killer .
This shows following the "law of the father" oral traditions of sinful men that served the pagan foundation. Shown with Cain and Abel the first recorded martyr, apostle. Cain to show the father of lies was a murderer from the beginning, its lie worked in Cain . . murdered his Brother the apostle Abel . Took him out to field and plowed him under. "Out of sight out of mind." no need for faith.
When Saul was converted, baptized by the hearing of faith .God closed his eyes to indicate he was spiritually blind and deaf.
Paul became the number one on the wanted to bury out of sight out of mind list...Paganism . They with the law of men called fathers made a attempt at making the law of God ( sola scriptura)to no effect calling it heresy . And their law of men the higher authority calling it Devine. But they could prove nothing.
Paul coming out from under that kind of influence of the earthly religious fathers. Gave glory to our unseen father in heaven.
They gave self edifying glory to each other, comparing themselves to themselves by their self.. Paying no mind to the law of God our Father in heaven ignoring the loving commandment not to call any man on earth father. . one is our unseen Father in heaven. This showed they had no faith needed to hear God. The kind of froward nation that God will prove as false on the last day.
Deuteronomy 32:20 And he said, I will hide my face from them, I will see what their end shall be: for they are a very froward generation, children in whom is no faith.
The evidence .
What's the verdict?
Acts 22:1-5 King James Version (KJV) Men, brethren, and fathers, hear ye my defence which I make now unto you.(And when they heard that he spake in the Hebrew tongue to them, they kept the more silence: and he saith,)I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, and taught according to the perfect mannerof the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day. And I persecuted this way unto the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women. As also the high priest doth bear me witness, and all the estate of the elders: from whom also I received letters unto the brethren, and went to Damascus, to bring them which were there bound unto Jerusalem, for to be punished.
Acts 24:5-6 For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes: Who also hath gone about to profane the temple: whom we took, and would have judged according to our law.
Acts 24:5-613-14 Neither can they prove the things whereof they now accuse me. But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets: (sola scriptura. )
They worshipped the fathers seen, the temporal And not the unseen Father .No man can serve two teaching Masters.
This is very true, and very dangerous. Everything cannot be parabolic.That's the real problem: you have made up your own meanings and concepts for many scriptural (and non-scriptural) terms,
Garee, you are right in one aspect: being educated doesn't necessarily mean that I have correct understanding of Scripture. However, it is wrong to assume that I don't because I'm educated, or that you do because you aren't. How about you just don't make assumptions at all regarding what I know and don't know.
I do happen to know what a parable is. You don't think I do, because your self-made concept is different than my widely-accepted concept. That's the real problem: you have made up your own meanings and concepts for many scriptural (and non-scriptural) terms, but you're the only one who holds them, and yet you argue as though your ideas are the right ones! That's called pride.
This is very true, and very dangerous. Everything cannot be parabolic.
God used Paul extensively after his conversion, and Paul was very useful because he had knowledge and understanding. Jesus taught Paul directly, giving him "gospel understanding" of the Old Testament. By the way, I'm sure Jesus didn't teach Paul in parables.I am not bragging of not having a better education. Saul was very proud serving the out of sight of of mind foundation . Paul became humble. Do you think as Paul saw parables differently after his conversion ?
This thread is not about tongues, and I won't discuss that topic here.Nothing proves nothing. You are still trying to prove that tongues is not prophecy. That kind of idea seems to follow with parables.
Is it insufficient to say that it's not a parable? How about you give us your definition of a parable.If I am making up stuff as you say you should be able to show why you disagree. Not just that's not a parable.
No, but when you call something a parable that is not a parable, you corrupt the plain meaning.Does it have to say this is a parable?
None of the parables in Luke 16 say, "You can't serve two teaching masters." Jesus was teaching that you can't serve both God and money.Its like the parable in a series in Luke 16 .No man can serve two teaching masters .Many glean some sort of teaching that life goes on for unbelievers after we die. What is the gospel meaning of that parable?
You keep taking that statement out of its context, and twisting its meaning. Jesus said plenty that was not in parables.Without parables the signified language of God Christ spoke not .
Dino wrote..God used Paul extensively after his conversion, and Paul was very useful because he had knowledge and understanding. Jesus taught Paul directly, giving him "gospel understanding" of the Old Testament. By the way, I'm sure Jesus didn't teach Paul in parables.
None of the parables in Luke 16 say, "You can't serve two teaching masters." Jesus was teaching that you can't serve both God and money.