Goes back to England and France, I'm sure there's a pagan tie.Is throwing the bouquet or garter at weddings to determine who will marry next divination?
Is throwing the bouquet or garter at weddings to determine who will marry next divination?
The way it is done now, or what I heard, that the one who catches the bouquet will be the next to marry.From what I have read, in Medieval times, women were so desperate to get married that a woman who was being married was considered lucky. To touch or possess any part of her Gown/assembly was thought to bring good luck to the one who got it. As I understand it, a point was reached where the wedding dresses of Brides were being torn off of her. The tossing of the bouquet was considered part of her assemble, and in order to distract those who would tear her dress, the Bride would toss the bouquet to give her a chance to escape with dress intact. Over time, it simply became a custom of the Wedding ceremony.
You can search this and get the full history.
I do not think it was an act of divination though.
Is throwing the bouquet or garter at weddings to determine who will marry next divination?
Is throwing the bouquet or garter at weddings to determine who will marry next divination?
I'm not entirely sure but I believe that the bride throws the bouquet to prospective single women and not guys. Prospective single guys try to catch the garter. I don't see anything evil about this practice because it is a wedding tradition but it sure is not divination.The way it is done now, or what I heard, that the one who catches the bouquet will be the next to marry.
When my male cousin was a teenager, he was standing around, probably not paying much attention, when his sister through the bouquet. It flew right at him and he caught it. Then, a heft women, probably in her late 20's or early 30's grabbed that thing out of his hand, hurting his fingers in the process. Maybe she really believed the superstition.
If people are throwing or catching it really believing it predicts the future, is that much different than reading the flight paths of birds or the filaments in animal livers to determine the future-- ancient methods of divination. Reading tea leaves is another method.
IF we don't believe in these things, should we go along with it? I hear in Bohemian Grove, a lot of wealthy people get together and reenact a sacrifice to a pagan deity. Many of them probably consider it a joke, but does worshipping Baal, or whatever, as a joke mean you aren't participating? I don't think treating things like this is a joke makes it okay, but even so, others there might not consider it a joke. Why should Christians participate in such things?
Strange that you mentioned Mathias as my wife and I just read the 1.st chapter of Acts this morning. The lot fell to Mathias to replace Judas as the 12th Apostle.With us drawing straws it is divination. With God whose name is Jealous he owns all things it was no gamble to him with Matthias when his number came up And Judas to represent the spirit of judgment fell backwards slain in the spirit.
I would say as long as the tradition does not do despite to the grace of God . Go for it. As Christians in one way we have all caught the bouquet a shadow of the hope, the gospel .
I feel sorry for the concubines. Its kind of rotten luck to be the second, third or fourth wife.
My cousin just happened to be standing at the wrong place at the wrong time, i think, and the bouquet came at him and he caught it instinctively.I'm not entirely sure but I believe that the bride throws the bouquet to prospective single women and not guys. Prospective single guys try to catch the garter. I don't see anything evil about this practice because it is a wedding tradition but it sure is not divination.
Your cousin dosent live in San Francisco does he?My cousin just happened to be standing at the wrong place at the wrong time, i think, and the bouquet came at him and he caught it instinctively.
Strange that you mentioned Mathias as my wife and I just read the 1.st chapter of Acts this morning. The lot fell to Mathias to replace Judas as the 12th Apostle.
really, I dont know. Maybe only the rich women get to be proper wives?If I am not mistaken, a concubine could be a first wife, even an only wife, back then. A slave taken as the masters wife was a concubine.
My understanding was that concubines were legitimate wives in Old Testament times. That is different from Roman concubines.really, I dont know. Maybe only the rich women get to be proper wives?
Nope. Both are just something fun to do at weddings.![]()