Calvinism and Context?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,836
13,558
113
#41
Sovereign choice, sure, but that still doesn't establish that it is done without condition. It doesn't matter when/where God makes the choice the question is whether God chooses based on some criteria known only to Him, or if there is no criteria on which He's choosing.

My big dispute with Calvinism is not the idea that God is choosing individuals based on His purpose, it is the distortion that simply because we don't know His criteria that He does not have a criteria. That there is not something besides what essentially amounts to luck of the draw that separates those He selects and those He leaves to their own.
It is a bit cryptic, "I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy"

What do you figure it means?
 
Apr 2, 2020
1,144
425
83
#42
It is a bit cryptic, "I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy"

What do you figure it means?
To get the idea, we have to look to the reference which is Jeremiah 18. There we read that this is directed at a collective body and speaks of their failure to uphold His covenant by doing evil, meaning He is not constrained to honor one-sided agreements but may judge whomever He wishes evil according to His justice. This is a far different thing than arbitrary mercy that the verse is often thrust forward to try to support. It's not even speaking of an individual, but to God's reworking the nation of Israel into the body of Christ.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,836
13,558
113
#43
To get the idea, we have to look to the reference which is Jeremiah 18. There we read that this is directed at a collective body and speaks of their failure to uphold His covenant by doing evil, meaning He is not constrained to honor one-sided agreements but may judge whomever He wishes evil according to His justice. This is a far different thing than arbitrary mercy that the verse is often thrust forward to try to support. It's not even speaking of an individual, but to God's reworking the nation of Israel into the body of Christ.
In Jeremiah 18 does He say "I am the LORD I will have mercy on who I will?"

Don't you mean Exodus 33? And how does Paul's use of it in Romans 9 explain how he understood it to be meant? I was expecting we need to figure those two out. But I'll read Jeremiah again
 
Apr 2, 2020
1,144
425
83
#44
In Jeremiah 18 He says I am the LORD I will have mercy on who I will?
Don't you mean Exodus 33?
I'm speaking to Romans 9 as it is the verse that uses that quote in context of God's sovereign choice in election. Exodus 33 the quote is a positive one in demonstrating that God is extending His mercy rather than one that includes the opposite implication of God electing to damnation.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,836
13,558
113
#45
Posthuman, dont just repeat your belief. Explain how the prodigal son, or the Israelites in Egypt didnt use reason in their decision. Here,

and the children of Israel sighed byreason of the bondage, and they cried, and their cry came up unto God by reason of the bondage. Ex.2:23

Explain how this would be arbitrary.
what's arbitrary is if God only chose a means of means of salvation and no one in particular to save. that's what i meant. but i will follow your tangent with you..

in my experience it's only those who find His sovereignty repugnant that accuse God of being arbitrary or capricious. but God does His will, Isaiah 46:10, and He shows mercy to whom He will, and His will is good and perfect, and no one gives Him counsel, Isaiah 40:13. He has set His Salvation so that it is not by human effort, desire or strength, but on God who has mercy, Romans 9:16. He gives the Son His sheep, and He knows every one by name, and loses none - He separates them from the goats.
the Father doesn't give the Son arbitrary sheep. He knows who are His. the Good Shepherd doesn't go stand at the corner and take whichever sheep randomly come near Him; that's what a thief does. the Good Shepherd seeks and saves His own, and they follow Him because they are His own - He is no robber: what is not His, will not be with Him.


God had already told Abraham that his descendants would be in bondage in Egypt and that He would free them. Genesis 15. that's not arbitrary, it's prophesy, and it's said beforehand so that they would know that He & He alone is the LORD and He does all His good pleasure according to His purpose, Isaiah 42:8-9.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,836
13,558
113
#46
Posthuman, dont just restate your belief. Describe how the prodigal son, orthe Israelites in Egypt used no reason for the decision they made. Here,
it's never been my belief that people use "no reason" for anything they do.
it's always been my belief that no man's free will can outweigh God's own, and no man's purpose can thwart God's own purpose


There is no wisdom or understanding Or counsel against the LORD
(Proverbs 21:30)
 

SoulWeaver

Senior Member
Oct 25, 2014
4,889
2,534
113
#47
Do we really need this many Calvinism threads? It's turning into stubbornness and bashing instead of real conversation. Let people believe whatever edifies them this isn't a salvation matter don't we have the unbelievers to minister to.
 

Journeyman

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2019
2,107
763
113
#48
what's arbitrary is if God only chose a means of means of salvation and no one in particular to save. that's what i meant. but i will follow your tangent with you..

in my experience it's only those who find His sovereignty repugnant that accuse God of being arbitrary or capricious. but God does His will, Isaiah 46:10, and He shows mercy to whom He will, and His will is good and perfect, and no one gives Him counsel, Isaiah 40:13. He has set His Salvation so that it is not by human effort, desire or strength, but on God who has mercy, Romans 9:16. He gives the Son His sheep, and He knows every one by name, and loses none - He separates them from the goats.
the Father doesn't give the Son arbitrary sheep. He knows who are His. the Good Shepherd doesn't go stand at the corner and take whichever sheep randomly come near Him; that's what a thief does. the Good Shepherd seeks and saves His own, and they follow Him because they are His own - He is no robber: what is not His, will not be with Him.


God had already told Abraham that his descendants would be in bondage in Egypt and that He would free them. Genesis 15. that's not arbitrary, it's prophesy, and it's said beforehand so that they would know that He & He alone is the LORD and He does all His good pleasure according to His purpose, Isaiah 42:8-9.
I see. Well, God says,

but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word. Isa.66:2

But lets rollow your tangent (lol). So you believe it's it's God's will for people to hate him. Right?
 

Journeyman

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2019
2,107
763
113
#49
it's never been my belief that people use "no reason" for anything they do.
it's always been my belief that no man's free will can outweigh God's own, and no man's purpose can thwart God's own purpose


There is no wisdom or understanding Or counsel against the LORD
(Proverbs 21:30)
It's my belief that God predetermined that believers will be saved and unbelievers won't. Of course, "They hated me without cause" can eother mean, "I gave them no reason to hate me", or, "I wanted them to hate me."

One id right. The ither is speaking evil of God.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#52
Do we really need this many Calvinism threads? It's turning into stubbornness and bashing instead of real conversation. Let people believe whatever edifies them this isn't a salvation matter don't we have the unbelievers to minister to.
1) Jesus who dies for the whole world paying for their sins and that all that need do is believe .
2) Jesus who only dies for select 'chosen ' group. And the rest cannot believe, because God has determined them to hell .
is this the same message? Is it the same Jesus ? The same good news ?
 

SoulWeaver

Senior Member
Oct 25, 2014
4,889
2,534
113
#53
1) Jesus who dies for the whole world paying for their sins and that all that need do is believe .
2) Jesus who only dies for select 'chosen ' group. And the rest cannot believe, because God has determined them to hell .
is this the same message? Is it the same Jesus ? The same good news ?
Do they discriminate or pre-judge people when evangelizing or do they preach to all? These details in beliefs don't make a practical difference in sharing the Gospel. Ultimately God has the first and the last word and there are plenty of Scriptures who urge people to choose to follow and obey Jesus for anyone who cares to read. Is three topics on Calvinism on the first page not enough yet. Sorry I think this thing is being blown way out of proportion.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#54
Do they discriminate or pre-judge people when evangelizing or do they preach to all? These details in beliefs don't make a practical difference in sharing the Gospel. Ultimately God has the first and the last word and there are plenty of Scriptures who urge people to choose to follow and obey Jesus for anyone who cares to read. Is three topics on Calvinism on the first page not enough yet. Sorry I think this thing is being blown way out of proportion.
Calvinism is false teaching ,so its hardly a minor matter . We have been given the message of reconciliation. That Jesus has reconciled the whole world and they need to believe this . If you think Calvinism is just another viable option ,you dont understand Calvinism .
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,429
6,707
113
#55
It would be very pleasant hearing the Word of God being shared and not opinions on any or all denominations, especially since the Word, Jesus-Yeshua, did not found any of them.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,836
13,558
113
#56
It would be very pleasant hearing the Word of God being shared and not opinions on any or all denominations, especially since the Word, Jesus-Yeshua, did not found any of them.
good idea :)

For you are a holy people to the LORD your God; the LORD your God has chosen you to be a people for Himself, a special treasure above all the peoples on the face of the earth. The LORD did not set His love on you nor choose you because you were more in number than any other people, for you were the least of all peoples; but because the LORD loves you, and because He would keep the oath which He swore to your fathers, the LORD has brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you from the house of bondage, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.
Therefore know that the LORD your God, He is God, the faithful God who keeps covenant and mercy for a thousand generations with those who love Him and keep His commandments; and He repays those who hate Him to their face, to destroy them. He will not be slack with him who hates Him; He will repay him to his face. Therefore you shall keep the commandment, the statutes, and the judgments which I command you today, to observe them.

(Deuteronomy 7:6-11)
  • did God choose Israel or did Israel choose God?
    • *hopefully* that's rhetorical question and we all know it's God who chose them
  • was it because of any merit on Israel's part?
    • nope
  • was Israel believing when He chose them?
    • nope, and adulterous, rebellious & wicked from day one
  • will God ever utterly forsake them even in their unbelief & hatred towards Him?
    • nope, never - for the sake of His name, and because of His great faithfulness
  • why is this in the Bible, are we supposed to learn something from it?
    • obviously, yes, this is testimony of the person and work of Christ
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,836
13,558
113
#57
It's my belief that God predetermined that believers will be saved and unbelievers won't. Of course, "They hated me without cause" can eother mean, "I gave them no reason to hate me", or, "I wanted them to hate me."

One id right. The ither is speaking evil of God.
And He began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things, and be rejected by the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again. He spoke this word openly.
Then Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him.
(Mark 8:31-32)
all this, the LORD had said beforehand, long before His Incarnation; it is all according to the scripture. these things must take place.

O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! Ought not the Christ to have suffered these things and to enter into His glory?” And beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, He expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself.
(Luke 24:25-27)
why does God say they "must" be this way?
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#58
My response was more to draw out the poster's theology. There is much "Calvin bashing" on this Forum, but nary one who will show the truth of the matter.
ok I'm curious. I do recognise there is a difference in what certain 'reformed 'teachers taught. Perhaps a different term would help ? is the T.U.L.I.P better than 'Calvinism '. I suppose its like Arminianism. Not all Arminains believe exactly what he taught and he is often misrepresented. Like I dont think he taught much on 'loss of salvation ' .
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#59
Yeah. On the content of your posting we can agree. But if my posting #32 is left standing, then the "saved" in verses 13 is not the "saved" Calvin or Arminius talked about, and even if it was, the selection is conditional - conditional on being a Christian in the Assembly at Thessaloniki.*

* Including only the Assembly at Thessaloniki might seem a strange position, but I have a reason for it. Reading 1st Thessalonians Chapters 1 and 3, and 2nd Thessalonians Chapter 1, it would seem by Paul's comments that this was an exceptional Church. They might have been temporarily discomforted by the strange doctrines that the "troublers" brought, but their Christian testimony is exemplary. In both Luke 21:36 and Revelation 3:10, escape from the Great Tribulation is reaffirmed, but it is conditional on the Christian being found "worthy" (Luke 21:36) and being found a "keeper of the Lord's word of patience" (Revelation 3:10). It would seem that even this "saved" stands in jeopardy for the slothful Christian.
Whats your thoughts on post 9#?
 
May 22, 2020
2,382
358
83
#60
Do we really need this many Calvinism threads? It's turning into stubbornness and bashing instead of real conversation. Let people believe whatever edifies them this isn't a salvation matter don't we have the unbelievers to minister to.

Wouldn't many say calvinism ...is unbelieving...thus salvation intrusion?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.