Was The Book Of Revelation Written Pre-70AD As Many Claim?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
T

Truth7t7

Well-known member
#161
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,495
113
#161
Kolistus said:
I heard they found some Trump votes in a river and stuff like that. Trump mentioned it in the first debate. This election is going to be the biggest scam in U.S. election history. The globalists want Biden in power no matter what. (Or anyone really, just as long as its not Trump)
Click to expand...
I agree 100%

Not just the commie globalist like George Soros and many others

President Trump has turned the tables over on all those against America First

50 years ago it was a sin to take American business outside the country, the bipartisan steel outside in Congress!

NAFTA in 1993 was the major turning point on the sell out, then followed by China being removed from a declared enemy, to the most favored nation for trade in 2000, check the voting out below, the political sell out of America $$$

Senate Congressional Record:

Senate Vote Nov 20, 1993 NAFTA Free Trade

Grouped By Vote Position
YEAs ---61​
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennett (R-UT)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Bond (R-MO)
Boren (D-OK)
Bradley (D-NJ)
Breaux (D-LA)
Brown (R-CO)
Bumpers (D-AR)
Chafee (R-RI)
Coats (R-IN)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coverdell (R-GA)
Danforth (R-MO)
Daschle (D-SD)
DeConcini (D-AZ)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dole (R-KS)
Domenici (R-NM)
Durenberger (R-MN)
Gorton (R-WA)
Graham (D-FL)
Gramm (R-TX)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hatfield (R-OR)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Jeffords (R-VT)
Johnston (D-LA)
Kassebaum (R-KS)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerrey (D-NE)
Kerry (D-MA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Mack (R-FL)
Mathews (D-TN)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Mitchell (D-ME)
Moseley-Braun (D-IL)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Nickles (R-OK)
Nunn (D-GA)
Packwood (R-OR)
Pell (D-RI)
Pressler (R-SD)
Pryor (D-AR)
Robb (D-VA)
Roth (R-DE)
Simon (D-IL)
Simpson (R-WY)
Specter (R-PA)
Wallop (R-WY)
Warner (R-VA)
NAYs ---38​
Akaka (D-HI)
Boxer (D-CA)
Bryan (D-NV)
Burns (R-MT)
Byrd (D-WV)
Campbell (D-CO)
Cohen (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Craig (R-ID)
D'Amato (R-NY)
Exon (D-NE)
Faircloth (R-NC)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Ford (D-KY)
Glenn (D-OH)
Heflin (D-AL)
Helms (R-NC)
Hollings (D-SC)
Inouye (D-HI)
Kempthorne (R-ID)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Levin (D-MI)
Metzenbaum (D-OH)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Moynihan (D-NY)
Reid (D-NV)
Riegle (D-MI)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Sasser (D-TN)
Shelby (D-AL)
Smith (R-NH)
Stevens (R-AK)
Thurmond (R-SC)
Wellstone (D-MN)
Wofford (D-PA)
Not Voting - 1​
Dorgan (D-ND)

Senate Congressional Record:

Senate Vote Sep 19, 2000 Normal China Trade Relations

Grouped By Vote Position
YEAs ---83​
Abraham (R-MI)
Allard (R-CO)
Ashcroft (R-MO)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Bond (R-MO)
Boxer (D-CA)
Breaux (D-LA)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bryan (D-NV)
Burns (R-MT)
Chafee, L. (R-RI)
Cleland (D-GA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
Daschle (D-SD)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dodd (D-CT)
Domenici (R-NM)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Edwards (D-NC)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Fitzgerald (R-IL)
Frist (R-TN)
Gorton (R-WA)
Graham (D-FL)
Gramm (R-TX)
Grams (R-MN)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerrey (D-NE)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Mack (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Miller (D-GA)
Moynihan (D-NY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Nickles (R-OK)
Reed (D-RI)
Robb (D-VA)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Roth (R-DE)
Santorum (R-PA)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Stevens (R-AK)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thompson (R-TN)
Thurmond (R-SC)
Torricelli (D-NJ)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)
Wyden (D-OR)
NAYs ---15​
Bunning (R-KY)
Byrd (D-WV)
Campbell (R-CO)
Feingold (D-WI)
Helms (R-NC)
Hollings (D-SC)
Hutchinson (R-AR)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Jeffords (R-VT)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Reid (D-NV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Smith (R-NH)
Specter (R-PA)
Wellstone (D-MN)
Not Voting - 2​
Akaka (D-HI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
 
L

lenna

Guest
#163
#163
Kolistus said:
I heard they found some Trump votes in a river and stuff like that. Trump mentioned it in the first debate. This election is going to be the biggest scam in U.S. election history. The globalists want Biden in power no matter what. (Or anyone really, just as long as its not Trump)
Click to expand...
and in the garbage can and in boxes and the dark side of the moon too I think

the globalists want a puppet in power and Harris has some very pointed teeth

we have the lord of the manor, Trudeau, sitting pretty up in Canada...a globalist but a wanna be powerful globalist ( compliant but not independent)

this election is looking an awful lot like a third world sham IMO
 
T

Truth7t7

Well-known member
#164
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,495
113
#164
lenna said:
and in the garbage can and in boxes and the dark side of the moon too I think

the globalists want a puppet in power and Harris has some very pointed teeth

we have the lord of the manor, Trudeau, sitting pretty up in Canada...a globalist but a wanna be powerful globalist ( compliant but not independent)

this election is looking an awful lot like a third world sham IMO
Click to expand...
Justinian Trudolt is a commie dictator, I'm surprised he was re-elected.

Shows how lost Canada really is, I pray for a peaceful victory for President Trump, time will tell?

President Trump And America are leading the turn in the world, UK-Brexit, Brazil, Australia, peace agreements in the middle east

The globalist world agenda took a major turn with President Trump, WHO, TPP, UN, China Trade, NATO, NAFTA

The globalist overlords hate President Trump, along with big business that are using China and 3rd world countries for slave labor, and to pollute their environments $$$
 
T

Truth7t7

Well-known member
#165
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,495
113
#165
Dino246 said:
ALL interpretations are partially preterist. Your attitude is terrible.
Click to expand...
Not all interpretations are partially preterist, my views are (Future Unfulled) your claim is false

1.) Matthew 24:15, Daniel's AOD (Future)

2.) Matthew 24:21, The Great Tribulation (Future)

3.) Matthew 24:29-30, The Second Coming (Future)
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#166
Jun 30, 2015
25,071
13,601
113
#166
Truth7t7 said:
Not all interpretations are partially preterist, my views are (Future Unfulled) your claim is false

1.) Matthew 24:15, Daniel's AOD (Future)

2.) Matthew 24:21, The Great Tribulation (Future)

3.) Matthew 24:29-30, The Second Coming (Future)
Click to expand...
If you believe that Jesus has already come in the flesh, then you are at least a partial preterist. If you don't, you aren't a Christian. ;)
 
T

Truth7t7

Well-known member
#167
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,495
113
#167
Dino246 said:
If you believe that Jesus has already come in the flesh, then you are at least a partial preterist. If you don't, you aren't a Christian. ;)
Click to expand...
Its apparent you dont have a clue on what the school on thought in Preterism even is, Smiles!

Preterism evolves around interpretation of the (Olivet Discourse)

Once again, my views are (Future Unfulfilled) concerning the (Olivet Discourse) as seen below.

1.) Matthew 24:15, Daniel's AOD (Future)

2.) Matthew 24:21, The Great Tribulation (Future)

3.) Matthew 24:29-30, The Second Coming (Future)

Wikipedia: Preterism, a Christian eschatological view, interprets some (partial preterism) or all (full preterism) prophecies of the Bible as events which have already happened. This school of thought interprets the Book of Daniel as referring to events that happened from the 7th century BC until the first century AD, while seeing the prophecies of the Book of Revelation as events that happened in the first century AD.

The term preterism comes from the Latin praeter, which is a prefix denoting that something is "past" or "beyond". Adherents of preterism are known as preterists. Preterism teaches that either all (full preterism) or a majority (partial preterism) of the Olivet discourse had come to pass by AD 70.
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#168
Jun 30, 2015
25,071
13,601
113
#168
Truth7t7 said:
Its apparent you dont have a clue on what the school on thought in Preterism even is, Smiles!

Preterism evolves around interpretation of the (Olivet Discourse)

Once again, my views are (Future Unfulfilled) concerning the (Olivet Discourse) as seen below.

1.) Matthew 24:15, Daniel's AOD (Future)

2.) Matthew 24:21, The Great Tribulation (Future)

3.) Matthew 24:29-30, The Second Coming (Future)

Wikipedia: Preterism, a Christian eschatological view, interprets some (partial preterism) or all (full preterism) prophecies of the Bible as events which have already happened. This school of thought interprets the Book of Daniel as referring to events that happened from the 7th century BC until the first century AD, while seeing the prophecies of the Book of Revelation as events that happened in the first century AD.

The term preterism comes from the Latin praeter, which is a prefix denoting that something is "past" or "beyond". Adherents of preterism are known as preterists. Preterism teaches that either all (full preterism) or a majority (partial preterism) of the Olivet discourse had come to pass by AD 70.
Click to expand...
Please learn how to use brackets correctly. Reading your posts is like reading the blather of a second-grader. You have absolutely no credibility with me because of your willful ignorance of this matter.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
#169
#169
Truth7t7 said:
Its apparent you dont have a clue on what the school on thought in Preterism even is, Smiles!

Preterism evolves around interpretation of the (Olivet Discourse)

Once again, my views are (Future Unfulfilled) concerning the (Olivet Discourse) as seen below.

1.) Matthew 24:15, Daniel's AOD (Future)

2.) Matthew 24:21, The Great Tribulation (Future)

3.) Matthew 24:29-30, The Second Coming (Future)

Wikipedia: Preterism, a Christian eschatological view, interprets some (partial preterism) or all (full preterism) prophecies of the Bible as events which have already happened. This school of thought interprets the Book of Daniel as referring to events that happened from the 7th century BC until the first century AD, while seeing the prophecies of the Book of Revelation as events that happened in the first century AD.

The term preterism comes from the Latin praeter, which is a prefix denoting that something is "past" or "beyond". Adherents of preterism are known as preterists. Preterism teaches that either all (full preterism) or a majority (partial preterism) of the Olivet discourse had come to pass by AD 70.
Click to expand...

Here is some help.

How to Use Brackets in Writing
 
T

Truth7t7

Well-known member
#170
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,495
113
#170
Dino246 said:
Please learn how to use brackets correctly. Reading your posts is like reading the blather of a second-grader. You have absolutely no credibility with me because of your willful ignorance of this matter.
Click to expand...
Big Smiles, The English Teacher Has (Spoken)

Forget About Answer Your False Claims, The Ole Diversion On The Use Of (Brackets) Real Big Smiles! :giggle:
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
#172
#172
Dino246 said:
Please learn how to use brackets correctly. Reading your posts is like reading the blather of a second-grader. You have absolutely no credibility with me because of your willful ignorance of this matter.
Click to expand...
Agree, but when I read the posts for some reason I find it {comical}.
 
T

Truth7t7

Well-known member
#174
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,495
113
#174
EleventhHour said:
We all make typos, especially when in a hurry, but written conventions are there for a reason.
Click to expand...
(Im) (Not) (The) (Best) (At) (Punctuation), (Im) (Not) (Here) (For) (Writing) (Classes), (Back) (To) (The) (Topic) (y)
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
#175
#175
Truth7t7 said:
(Im) (Not) (The) (Best) (At) (Punctuation), (Im) (Not) (Here) (For) (Writing) (Classes), (Back) (To) (The) (Topic) (y)
Click to expand...
You can save yourself some effort by keeping it simple, there is no need for brackets most of the time.
 
T

Truth7t7

Well-known member
#176
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,495
113
#176
EleventhHour said:
Agree, but when I read the posts for some reason I find it {comical}.
Click to expand...
That's ({Comical})

A Big Smile On How Posters Will Use Claims Of Punctuation, To Excuse Their False Claims Made Without Response, Now That's (Comical),

And To Watch Other Posters Stand In Agreement With Them, Thats Even More (Comical)
 
T

Truth7t7

Well-known member
#177
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,495
113
#177
EleventhHour said:
You can save yourself some effort by keeping it simple, there is no need for brackets most of the time.
Click to expand...
My punctuation isnt the problem,the posters inability to respond to their false claims made regarding Preterism is, now that's (Comical)

The poster dosent have a clue on what Preterism is, and runs around in correction like a blind man, more comedy.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
#178
#178
Truth7t7 said:
My punctuation isnt the problem,the posters inability to respond to their false claims made is, now that's (Comical)
Click to expand...
Not sure to whom you are referring, however my view is this, while yes typos and grammatical errors occur on a discussion board, this not formal format like an essay, written expression is a tool for communication and we should try to adhere to written conventions so that our out of respect for our readers and so that our ideas are comprehensible.
 
T

Truth7t7

Well-known member
#180
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,495
113
#180
EleventhHour said:
written expression is a tool for communication and we should try to adhere to written conventions so that our out of respect for our readers and so that our ideas are comprehensible.
Click to expand...
Your Teaching Proper English And Punctuation? o_O:eek:

Have You every heard of that saying?

"The pot calling the kettle black"

Stop while a little respect is left, Big Smiles!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.