What caused the buildings on 9/11 collapse?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

What caused the buildings on 9/11 collapse?

  • Total voters
    12
PC123

PC123

Banned
#1
Jun 22, 2020
1,231
741
113
Australia
#1
On the 11th of September 2001, two planes flew into the twin towers in New York. They both collapsed along with a smaller building...
There was also another plane that crashed into the pentagon.

Its over 21 years later and alternate theories have circulated... So im wondering... What do people think now...

I will give my opinion later in the thread. I don't want it to influence anyone and i don't want my opinion to be the topic either...

What caused the buildings on 9/11 to collapse and why?
 
UCA4J

UCA4J

Banned
#2
Nov 15, 2020
1,897
362
83
Newcastle, NSW, Australia
#2
PC123 said:
On the 11th of September 2001, two planes flew into the twin towers in New York. They both collapsed along with a smaller building...
There was also another plane that crashed into the pentagon.

Its over 21 years later and alternate theories have circulated... So im wondering... What do people think now...

I will give my opinion later in the thread. I don't want it to influence anyone and i don't want my opinion to be the topic either...

What caused the buildings on 9/11 to collapse and why?
Click to expand...
did you see it happen at the time ?
 
B

billabong

Member
#3
Jun 5, 2018
93
59
18
#3
Something very wrong when no one has explained how tower 7 was "pulled" making it come crashing down on it's self on the same day.
Tower 7 caught alight yet self extinguished, media reported that the fire damaged tower 7 therefore they needed to "pull it".
Take a look at the footage, the damage was minor in my opinion.
Weeks of work would be needed to arrange all the explosives in that building in order to "pull it" and yet they (who is they?) managed to have the building demolished in hours during all the calamity of towers 1 and 2 demolished in the morning of that very same day.
There was reports from firemen that they heard explosions happening in the lower floors of the twin towers.
And in the aftermath we saw images of great big steel girders that looked as though they were cut with an oversized oxy-accetalene cutting torch not to mention all the other oddities.
I have big doubts that the plains caused the twin towers to come crashing down at free fall speed, I think there is much more to it
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#6
Jun 30, 2015
25,470
13,783
113
#6
What caused the buildings to collapse?

Gravity.

:cool:
 
Billyd

Billyd

Senior Member
#7
May 8, 2014
5,228
1,632
113
#7
Two fully fueled planes and a high energy impact.
 
PC123

PC123

Banned
#9
Jun 22, 2020
1,231
741
113
Australia
#9
billabong said:
reported that the fire damaged tower 7 therefore they needed to "pull it".
Click to expand...
They said that... Geeez... Its not a job u could do in a day.
The main piece of evidence is in the physics. It came down much to quickly, almost accelerating with gravity
 
B

billabong

Member
#12
Jun 5, 2018
93
59
18
#12
Lanolin

Lanolin

Well-known member
#13
Dec 15, 2018
23,460
7,188
113
#13
I wasnt there, though didnt two planes crash into it? what happened to the pentagon, a plane crashed there too but it wasnt totally destroyed. As far as I know.

Havent they built an even bigger, taller tower in the twins towers place and theres a huge pit as a memorial they call it ground zero?

Theres also a conspiracy theory about mt erebus air crash, that air nz was responsible, the gps got coordinates. wrong or someone accidentaly (or deliberately?) altered the flight plan. although they try to say it was just pilot error. The pilots themselves are dead so cant tell us what they were thinking at the time. But I dont think we'll ever know the full story.

In any case a huge tragedy.
 
Ahwatukee

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
#14
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,376
113
#14
billabong said:
Something very wrong when no one has explained how tower 7 was "pulled" making it come crashing down on it's self on the same day.
Tower 7 caught alight yet self extinguished, media reported that the fire damaged tower 7 therefore they needed to "pull it".
Take a look at the footage, the damage was minor in my opinion.
Weeks of work would be needed to arrange all the explosives in that building in order to "pull it" and yet they (who is they?) managed to have the building demolished in hours during all the calamity of towers 1 and 2 demolished in the morning of that very same day.
There was reports from firemen that they heard explosions happening in the lower floors of the twin towers.
And in the aftermath we saw images of great big steel girders that looked as though they were cut with an oversized oxy-accetalene cutting torch not to mention all the other oddities.
I have big doubts that the plains caused the twin towers to come crashing down at free fall speed, I think there is much more to it
Click to expand...
Not to mention that all three buildings came down perfectly in their own footprint, just like a planned demolition. There was no reason for building 7 to collapse and that perfectly, just like with a demolition. They had one man with a hardhat that came out of building 7 saying "keep your eye on this building, because it's coming down." How would he know that? It would take a metallurgical test to determine the structural integrity of the building. It is also of interest that the buildings surrounding towers 1 & 2 that were completely burned out did not collapse.
 
PC123

PC123

Banned
#15
Jun 22, 2020
1,231
741
113
Australia
#15
billabong said:
Agreed, 6.6 seconds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hy6FUd0_TzQ&feature=youtu.be

“Pulling” Building 7 (The Unquestioned Answers)
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils in Government/911 Cover-up/wtc7.htm
Click to expand...
6. 6 seconds they say for building 7... Ok..
I crunched the numbers and figured out that it would take 6.8 seconds for an object to reach the ground from the same height. Looking again it looks like its closer to 7 seconds to me anyway. For the few people that know physics this building also fell at the same rate as gravity, its floor literally taken from beneath it and u can see it too
 
PC123

PC123

Banned
#16
Jun 22, 2020
1,231
741
113
Australia
#16
Im not sure how many people would have done physics. Those of us that have can see there s something wrong immediately. Newtons 3rd law is violated and nothing should of proceeded b4 this error was accounted for. In fact this error would only serve to drive the investigation to find out why it fell so quick
 
Lanolin

Lanolin

Well-known member
#17
Dec 15, 2018
23,460
7,188
113
#17
I never really investigated it, Im supposing a skyscraper like the twin towers would have burned out first and not collapsed so suddenly and neatly, though nobody ever questions what, if anything, was hidden inside the twin towers that they were trying to destroy.
aside from. people which it seemed was collataral damage. Nobody seems to talk about it. It was no accident. If it was just people and trying to attack americans, and make a war, they would have done it far more randomly and generally with bombs.
 
UCA4J

UCA4J

Banned
#18
Nov 15, 2020
1,897
362
83
Newcastle, NSW, Australia
#18
Lanolin said:
I never really investigated it, Im supposing a skyscraper like the twin towers would have burned out first and not collapsed so suddenly and neatly, though nobody ever questions what, if anything, was hidden inside the twin towers that they were trying to destroy.
aside from. people which it seemed was collataral damage. Nobody seems to talk about it. It was no accident. If it was just people and trying to attack americans, and make a war, they would have done it far more randomly and generally with bombs.
Click to expand...
were the towers structurally sound ?
 
B

billabong

Member
#19
Jun 5, 2018
93
59
18
#19
PC123 said:
6. 6 seconds they say for building 7... Ok..
I crunched the numbers and figured out that it would take 6.8 seconds for an object to reach the ground from the same height. Looking again it looks like its closer to 7 seconds to me anyway. For the few people that know physics this building also fell at the same rate as gravity, its floor literally taken from beneath it and u can see it too
Click to expand...
Yep, 100% correct.

[QUOTE="PC123, this building also fell at the same rate as gravity[/QUOTE]

That's right, "free-fall speed" was the buzz word at the time.
 
B

billabong

Member
#20
Jun 5, 2018
93
59
18
#20
UCA4J said:
were the towers structurally sound ?
Click to expand...
After noticing that something was just not right, I started to follow all the chatter online. I don't recall anyone mentioning problems with the structural integrity of the towers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.