Is the double slit experiment proof of original sin?
- Thread starter pittsburghjoe
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
yeah that's exactly what i'm talking about --
suppose what you said is true; you can imagine X and we can't.
you could have posted an attempt at explaining X from a perspective we can understand. like a tutor doing their job would do; try explaining a concept several ways until something clicks with the person who needs instruction. as though you actually care about others.
but instead you posted "y'all too dumb to even imagine X" -- so i think, you're not interested in the truth about X, not to the point that you want it to be understood. i think that what you are interested in, is being more clever than others, and for others to look at you as tho you are. as though you only care about yourself.
am i close?
suppose what you said is true; you can imagine X and we can't.
you could have posted an attempt at explaining X from a perspective we can understand. like a tutor doing their job would do; try explaining a concept several ways until something clicks with the person who needs instruction. as though you actually care about others.
but instead you posted "y'all too dumb to even imagine X" -- so i think, you're not interested in the truth about X, not to the point that you want it to be understood. i think that what you are interested in, is being more clever than others, and for others to look at you as tho you are. as though you only care about yourself.
am i close?
-
2
- Show all
this is different than the 'wave' of the quantum mechanical description of the universe. that's a 'wave' in probability space, which isn't the same as the wave-like properties of the created things. this is describing creation in statistical terms, which is to say, they are indeterminate. that's fundamentally different than saying that solid things behave like oscillating fields from certain perspectives.
saying the universe is fundamentally "waveform" in the context of QM is saying that the future is unknowable to us and the present is untouchable. it's not saying that physicality is illusion, and it's not saying that physicality is evil. it's saying that physicality - "the things which were made" - is beyond knowing, in any sense that any human being could ever know, or even the universe itself could know. it has freedom; it is past finding out.
the photons that are unobserved before going through the slits make interference patterns on a wall opposite the slits. like they are wave-like.
but the photons make the pattern because they actually strike the wall opposite the slits, and reflect off it. like they are particle-like, physical things.
you wouldn't see anything at all if they didn't behave like particles. everything you've ever seen, is reflected light. photons acting not like waves, but like point-masses. everyone would be blind if not for the particle-like properties of photonic light.
so it is also saying that physicality - the things which were created - exists and that it has existence by virtue of being observed by a Consciousness which can see the unseen, and know the unknowable. that can make visible the invisible.
the universe, all that the Creator created in it, both the things that are seen and the things that are unseen, is at basic levels, like the casting of lots. and the lot is cast in the lap, but its every turning is of the LORD -- the Creator of these things. ((Proverbs 16:33))
saying the universe is fundamentally "waveform" in the context of QM is saying that the future is unknowable to us and the present is untouchable. it's not saying that physicality is illusion, and it's not saying that physicality is evil. it's saying that physicality - "the things which were made" - is beyond knowing, in any sense that any human being could ever know, or even the universe itself could know. it has freedom; it is past finding out.
the photons that are unobserved before going through the slits make interference patterns on a wall opposite the slits. like they are wave-like.
but the photons make the pattern because they actually strike the wall opposite the slits, and reflect off it. like they are particle-like, physical things.
you wouldn't see anything at all if they didn't behave like particles. everything you've ever seen, is reflected light. photons acting not like waves, but like point-masses. everyone would be blind if not for the particle-like properties of photonic light.
so it is also saying that physicality - the things which were created - exists and that it has existence by virtue of being observed by a Consciousness which can see the unseen, and know the unknowable. that can make visible the invisible.
the universe, all that the Creator created in it, both the things that are seen and the things that are unseen, is at basic levels, like the casting of lots. and the lot is cast in the lap, but its every turning is of the LORD -- the Creator of these things. ((Proverbs 16:33))
-
1
- Show all
Jesus ate a fish. and Jesus ascended. physically.
they thought, He is not resurrected physical. He proved He was physical by eating a fish. they were wrong, but He demonstrated the truth to them. they were in unbelief, but He taught them, and they believed. ((Luke 24:42-43))
**next**
they thought, He is not resurrected physical. He proved He was physical by eating a fish. they were wrong, but He demonstrated the truth to them. they were in unbelief, but He taught them, and they believed. ((Luke 24:42-43))
**next**
-
1
- Show all
lol, wow, sell me your book and refer me to read it
((or alternately, spend 30 seconds talking to another living soul))
do ya think i haven't told you the same things? you've still got the same heresy, and i'm still pointing out the same flaws.
welcome to 'discussion forum' ha
where was Satan when he sinned, in heaven?
was Satan cast out of heaven unjustly, while he was innocent, or did he sin in heaven?
why was there war in heaven?
((or alternately, spend 30 seconds talking to another living soul))
do ya think i haven't told you the same things? you've still got the same heresy, and i'm still pointing out the same flaws.
welcome to 'discussion forum' ha
where was Satan when he sinned, in heaven?
was Satan cast out of heaven unjustly, while he was innocent, or did he sin in heaven?
why was there war in heaven?
For the 50th time. Satan was the first to sin. He caused disorder in God's Kingdom. God's Kingdom is orderly ..that means it is coherent. Disorder in Coherence is DECOHERENCE. Satan is the ruler and has authority because he started this place. Corruption and Fallen = Satan. You can't have decoherence without coherence being here first. Satan doesn't create anything. Disorder of coherence can cause physical uniqueness and physical history.
War in heaven is war in heaven between angels.
War in heaven is war in heaven between angels.
Disorder in coherence causes things to be finite. Finite objects can be about themselves. They can sin.
Everything about this place is about sin. Gravity, Age, Physicality (uniqueness/history), Entropy, Decay, and Death.
Does anyone think we will be able to "pleasure" ourselves in Heaven? You need a physical body for that.
Everything about this place is about sin. Gravity, Age, Physicality (uniqueness/history), Entropy, Decay, and Death.
Does anyone think we will be able to "pleasure" ourselves in Heaven? You need a physical body for that.