ALERT: THE VACCINE MIGHT BE THE MARK OF THE BEAST
- Thread starter saintrose
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
No I can’t see anything, but somehow I’m guessing it’s just more of the bitter bashing.
We all know what our moms said. The gossiping basher says more about them than the person they intend to bash.
But heck. I could be wrong and maybe the post was a swallowing of pride and apology.
We all know what our moms said. The gossiping basher says more about them than the person they intend to bash.
But heck. I could be wrong and maybe the post was a swallowing of pride and apology.
No, you would rather go on and on and pretend you are innocent.
And as usual, you are overly eager to bash and misrepresent.
Get a clue, Ed. Telling you to your face when you are wrong is not gossip.
That you plug your ears and say you can't hear me is on you.
So we don't do anything? Just take everything as it comes and wait for that day when we're forced? Should we warn people ahead of time or just let people continue on as if nothing is wrong? Will people know something is wrong if we don't talk about it? I agree nobody will take the Mark by accident. It'll be a choice. And the vaccine isn't the Mark. But couldn't it be possible that the vaccine is setting people up to accept whatever the "system" wants them to do in the future?
I'm honestly asking. Trying to wrangle my mind around the whole issue. Not trying to be snarky.
I'm honestly asking. Trying to wrangle my mind around the whole issue. Not trying to be snarky.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
The research and development that spawned vaccines is a direct result of killing babies. N
Not all modern vaccines actually contain stem cells, but the ones without stem cells owe their existence to research and development started by abortionists.
Either way you look at it, despite the unsavory health benefits of vaccines, like the covid-19 vaccines, there are moral and ethical ground to stand out that there isn't a good alternative.
I think most places have religious exemptions for things, but many places don't. If they try to force a vaccine on you, maybe it's time to either move to a new start or take them to court.
Not all modern vaccines actually contain stem cells, but the ones without stem cells owe their existence to research and development started by abortionists.
Either way you look at it, despite the unsavory health benefits of vaccines, like the covid-19 vaccines, there are moral and ethical ground to stand out that there isn't a good alternative.
I think most places have religious exemptions for things, but many places don't. If they try to force a vaccine on you, maybe it's time to either move to a new start or take them to court.
S
It is possible that the Mark of the Beast forced upon them will be a tatoo. It will be required to buy or sell. It is possible that current technologies are all part of whatever technology the antichrist will use.
But what we should do? The mission has never changed since the book of Revelation was written. We are to preach the Gospel and plant churches throughout the world looking eagerly for the coming of the Lord. By planting churches and those churches becoming evangelists to their community and planting more churches until Jesus comes again should be what we are busy doing about it.
We are not told to figure out the mechanism of the mark to be ready, or to get others ready with such explanations concerning the mark. We are told to preach the Gospel and to watch and to pray.
If we focus on our relationship with Christ and turning from anything that is not pleasing to God in our lives we can know that we will be able to resist the demand to deny Christ at threat of death. Loving Jesus with all our heart, soul, mind and body is what will ensure that we are ready and have the spiritual grace to resist the antichrist and the mark. If we resist sin today we can be sure we will die for him tomorrow if called upon. If do not deny the flesh today we are fooling ourselves if we think we will not fold under threat of death tomorrow.
This prophecy concerning the mark is going to happen and there is nothing that we can do to stop it. We can preach from the book of Revelation and certainly there is value in doing so as a method of "warning". Guessing exactly what the mark is going to be before it happens is not the best way to warn people. Instead we should warn them about eternity and the wages of sin. We should keep preaching the Gospel to every creature.
But what we should do? The mission has never changed since the book of Revelation was written. We are to preach the Gospel and plant churches throughout the world looking eagerly for the coming of the Lord. By planting churches and those churches becoming evangelists to their community and planting more churches until Jesus comes again should be what we are busy doing about it.
We are not told to figure out the mechanism of the mark to be ready, or to get others ready with such explanations concerning the mark. We are told to preach the Gospel and to watch and to pray.
If we focus on our relationship with Christ and turning from anything that is not pleasing to God in our lives we can know that we will be able to resist the demand to deny Christ at threat of death. Loving Jesus with all our heart, soul, mind and body is what will ensure that we are ready and have the spiritual grace to resist the antichrist and the mark. If we resist sin today we can be sure we will die for him tomorrow if called upon. If do not deny the flesh today we are fooling ourselves if we think we will not fold under threat of death tomorrow.
This prophecy concerning the mark is going to happen and there is nothing that we can do to stop it. We can preach from the book of Revelation and certainly there is value in doing so as a method of "warning". Guessing exactly what the mark is going to be before it happens is not the best way to warn people. Instead we should warn them about eternity and the wages of sin. We should keep preaching the Gospel to every creature.
S
This isn't even close to correct. Please keep reading on the history of vaccines. From the beginning to date. Using the fetal cells of two aborted fetuses from the 1960s was unfortunate as I don't believe in abortion. However, they could have used an ethically derived cell and nothing would have changed. There is more to vaccines than using the cloned cells which get continuously cloned for medical purposes. There are many cloned cells that are used in medical research. To discount all the benefits of vaccines or to paint all vaccines as having some connection to fetal cells is not accurate and really sounds like the kind of ignorance we saw in the Salem witch-hunts among the religiously zealous.
You aren't a voice of reason if that's your honest opinion of me.
You didn't know that vaccines have their origins in two babies murdered back in the 1960s who's stem cells are still being grown right now up until this present day?
Germs for human vaccines tend to grow best in cells from humans. That's why they use the stem cells to create the vaccines. Modern vaccine research and development owes it's existence to abortionists.
You sound like you're defending the usage of vaccine and, by proxy, dignifying abortion.
You didn't know that vaccines have their origins in two babies murdered back in the 1960s who's stem cells are still being grown right now up until this present day?
Germs for human vaccines tend to grow best in cells from humans. That's why they use the stem cells to create the vaccines. Modern vaccine research and development owes it's existence to abortionists.
You sound like you're defending the usage of vaccine and, by proxy, dignifying abortion.
The story of vaccines did not begin with the first vaccine–Edward Jenner’s use of material from cowpox pustules to provide protection against smallpox. Rather, it begins with the long history of infectious disease in humans, and in particular, with early uses of smallpox material to provide immunity to that disease.
Evidence exists that the Chinese employed smallpox inoculation (or variolation, as such use of smallpox material was called) as early as 1000 CE. It was practiced in Africa and Turkey as well, before it spread to Europe and the Americas.
Edward Jenner’s innovations, begun with his successful 1796 use of cowpox material to create immunity to smallpox, quickly made the practice widespread. His method underwent medical and technological changes over the next 200 years, and eventually resulted in the eradication of smallpox.
Louis Pasteur’s 1885 rabies vaccine was the next to make an impact on human disease. And then, at the dawn of bacteriology, developments rapidly followed. Antitoxins and vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, anthrax, cholera, plague, typhoid, tuberculosis, and more were developed through the 1930s. source
Meanwhile, the fetal fibroblast cells used to grow vaccine viruses were first
obtained from elective termination of two pregnancies in the early 1960s.
Evidence exists that the Chinese employed smallpox inoculation (or variolation, as such use of smallpox material was called) as early as 1000 CE. It was practiced in Africa and Turkey as well, before it spread to Europe and the Americas.
Edward Jenner’s innovations, begun with his successful 1796 use of cowpox material to create immunity to smallpox, quickly made the practice widespread. His method underwent medical and technological changes over the next 200 years, and eventually resulted in the eradication of smallpox.
Louis Pasteur’s 1885 rabies vaccine was the next to make an impact on human disease. And then, at the dawn of bacteriology, developments rapidly followed. Antitoxins and vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, anthrax, cholera, plague, typhoid, tuberculosis, and more were developed through the 1930s. source
Meanwhile, the fetal fibroblast cells used to grow vaccine viruses were first
obtained from elective termination of two pregnancies in the early 1960s.
S
Your understanding of vaccines is not accurate. Yes there are vaccines that have used cloned cells from two two aborted babies. But not all and not the first ones since vaccines got started full swing in the 40s. Not all vaccines used fetal cells. The vaccines don't grow in cells. The viruses they use infect cells and in the development stage when they modify the virus they need cells for it to multiply. Some vaccines use ethically derived cells. Flu shots for example use several kinds of cells. Some dog liver cells, some chicken egg cells, there is even a vaccine coming out that uses moth cells. And the very first vaccine did not use these fetal cells therefore your premise that all vaccines have their roots in aborted fetal cells and are therefore immoral is false.
Vaccines have saved millions of lives. God has blessed us with effective COVID19 vaccines and I thank Him for it. People who would scare people away from vaccines are not doing a good work. If someone dies because of antivaccine misinformation I believe those who spread the misinformation are guilty of an immoral act. We have different views of reality.
Vaccines have saved millions of lives. God has blessed us with effective COVID19 vaccines and I thank Him for it. People who would scare people away from vaccines are not doing a good work. If someone dies because of antivaccine misinformation I believe those who spread the misinformation are guilty of an immoral act. We have different views of reality.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Vaccines for varicella (chickenpox), rubella (the “R” in the MMR vaccine), hepatitis A, rabies (one version) and COVID-19 (one U.S.-approved version) are all made by growing the viruses in fetal cells. All of these, except the COVID-19 vaccine, are made using fibroblast cells. The COVID-19 vaccine (Johnson & Johnson (J&J)/Janssen) is made using fetal retinal cells.
Fibroblast cell history
Fibroblast cells are the cells needed to hold skin and other connective tissue together. The fetal fibroblast cells used to grow vaccine viruses were first obtained from elective termination of two pregnancies in the early 1960s. These same fetal cells obtained from the early 1960s have continued to grow in the laboratory and are used to make vaccines today. No further sources of fetal cells are needed to make these vaccines.
The reasons that fetal cells were originally used included:
Retinal cell history
The retinal cells used to make the COVID-19 adenovirus vaccine (J&J/Janssen) were isolated from a terminated fetus in 1985 and adapted for use in growing adenovirus-based vaccines in the late 1990s.
Adenovirus-based vaccines that cannot replicate when administered to people need to be produced in cells that have the necessary gene to allow for large quantities of the virus to be made. The retinal cell line, called PER.C6, was adapted to enable production of these altered viruses.
Even though fetal cells are used to grow vaccine viruses, vaccines do not contain these cells or pieces of DNA that are recognizable as human DNA. People can be reassured by the following:
Fibroblast cell history
Fibroblast cells are the cells needed to hold skin and other connective tissue together. The fetal fibroblast cells used to grow vaccine viruses were first obtained from elective termination of two pregnancies in the early 1960s. These same fetal cells obtained from the early 1960s have continued to grow in the laboratory and are used to make vaccines today. No further sources of fetal cells are needed to make these vaccines.
The reasons that fetal cells were originally used included:
- Viruses need cells to grow and tend to grow better in cells from humans than animals (because they infect humans).
- Almost all cells die after they have divided a certain number of times; scientifically, this number is known as the Hayflick limit. For most cell lines, including fetal cells, it is around 50 divisions; however, because fetal cells have not divided as many times as other cell types, they can be used longer. In addition, because of the ability to maintain cells at very low temperatures, such as in liquid nitrogen, scientists are able to continue using the same fetal cell lines that were isolated in the 1960s.
Retinal cell history
The retinal cells used to make the COVID-19 adenovirus vaccine (J&J/Janssen) were isolated from a terminated fetus in 1985 and adapted for use in growing adenovirus-based vaccines in the late 1990s.
Adenovirus-based vaccines that cannot replicate when administered to people need to be produced in cells that have the necessary gene to allow for large quantities of the virus to be made. The retinal cell line, called PER.C6, was adapted to enable production of these altered viruses.
Even though fetal cells are used to grow vaccine viruses, vaccines do not contain these cells or pieces of DNA that are recognizable as human DNA. People can be reassured by the following:
- When viruses grow in cells, the cells are killed because in most cases the new viruses burst the cells to be released.
- Once the vaccine virus is grown, it is purified, so that cellular debris and growth reagents are removed.
- During this process of purification, any remaining cellular DNA is also broken down. To learn more about DNA and vaccine, visit the “Vaccine ingredients – DNA” page.
Vaccines derived from stem cell research are an abomination in God's eyes. Did you know that God hates it with a burning passion when people shed innocent blood? Thats what abortionists do; they shed innocent blood and you're defending them. Doesn't seem like you're factoring that God doesn't forget things that happens back in the 1960s or any time.
Yeah we clearly do see reality different. You have a secular view of vaccines and I have a spiritual view. I'll keep my views but thanks anyway.
Yeah we clearly do see reality different. You have a secular view of vaccines and I have a spiritual view. I'll keep my views but thanks anyway.
S
We know this. But not all vaccines use cloned fetal cells. And the first ones predate the 60s. Keep reading about the history of vaccines in general. You cannot say that all vaccines are connected to fetal cell technology because that is not true. You made it up out of your own head. Also mRNA vaccines don't use any cells and they don't have any connection to fetal cell technology so therefore it is not possible to say that if someone receives an mRNA vaccine they are supporting abortion or some such nonsense. When you talk like that you just make yourself look like a religious zealot and you ruin any chance of anyone listening to you tell them the Gospel because they have already written you off as a dishonest fanatic who uses partial truths to make up a lie.
Here is an excellent summation of why these vaccines with fetal tissue cells are unacceptable:
Vaccines using fetal tissue: 12 faulty assumptions
Some beliefs about the morality of vaccines using fetal tissue are flawed because they rest upon faulty assumptions — thus, whichever side you stand on, it’s worth considering the most common ones.
April 1, 2021 (Fetal Tissue Vaccines) — As with the MMR [1] vaccine, the Oxford/AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine are produced in cell lines derived from abortions [2] — by contrast, Moderna and Pfizer’s vaccines used them in testing.[3]
The debate around the morality of fetal tissue vaccines frequently has at its heart three beliefs: In receiving the vaccine we are not cooperating with past evil; In receiving the vaccine we are not contributing to present or future evil; There is almost no connection between the vaccine and the murdered baby.
These beliefs are flawed because they rest upon faulty assumptions — thus, whichever side you stand on, it’s worth considering the most common ones.
1. “Only a few babies were used.”
While each individual cell line contains the cells of just one baby, many aborted babies are used in the process of creating a cell line.[4] For example, under oath, scientist Stanley Plotkin admitted that there were 76 aborted babies used in just one vaccine study.[5] Furthermore, with cell line WI-25 we know that it was the 25th specimen from the 19th baby.[6]
The two cell strains used by COVID vaccines are named HEK293 and PERC6.[7] The name HEK293 stands for a Human Embryonic Kidney from the 293rd experiment [8] — we can be confident that more babies preceded the final baby used for HEK293.[9]
2. “The babies were of a very early gestation.”
Most of the babies whose tissue formed the basis of the different vaccine cell lines, were over 3 months when aborted.[10] For example, under oath, scientist Stanley Plotkin admitted that all of the 76 unborn babies used in the study were 3 months or older.[11] At 3 months, a baby is fully formed: “she has begun swallowing and kicking … facial muscles are getting a workout as her tiny features form one expression after another …”[12]
3. “Consent was given, so usage is ethical.”
Parties to a murder cannot ethically donate the body of their victim to research. Thus it follows that no meaningful consent exists. (Though the mothers involved are often, to varying extents, victims themselves.)
4. “The baby was dead when the tissue was taken.”
With fetal tissue research, cell death renders the tissue unfit for purpose: tissues and organs must be harvested “within 5 minutes” [13, 14] and at times this occurs while the baby’s heart is still beating [15, 16] — this was also revealed during a Planned Parenthood court deposition.[17, 18]
Thus, harvesting the organs can be a type of torture [19] beyond the normal abortion procedure. Though we have no definitive proof live harvesting occurred specifically in the making of vaccine cell lines, since it is “no rare event” [20, 21, 22, 23] there are legitimate grounds for concern.[24]
5. “Some were from miscarriages.”
“The requirements for ‘freshness’ of many human foetal tissues” [25] mean it is extremely unlikely any were from miscarriages.[26] “To obtain embryo cells, embryos from spontaneous abortions cannot be used…”[27]
6. “Using a dead body is distinct from abortion.”
Some imagine that those involved in creating the cell lines have nothing to do with the abortion itself. However, in advance of the abortion of a fetus whose tissue will be used for research, there are a number of steps that take place. These include obtaining consent, conducting genetic screening,[28] selecting the abortion method [29] and other steps for optimal harvesting [30] — all of which impact the abortionist’s conduct, creating considerable interplay with the agent seeking human material, who thus “becomes to some extent an accessory”.[31] A parallel to Saul at Stephen’s stoning [32] exists — Saul didn’t throw a stone, but as a consenting bystander he was not without moral guilt.[33] In cases of live tissue extraction, research is still more directly connected to murder.
7. “No one now profits from the abortion.”
Companies who developed the cell lines continue to be rewarded by their use, including in vaccines.[34] Thus direct benefit accrues to agents complicit in the original murder.
8. “Vaccines don’t contain the child’s actual cells.”
Vaccines produced in cell lines contain fragments [35] of the child’s DNA — one study even found “a complete individual genome” [36] of the aborted child. The divided cells the vaccine was grown in would have been the child’s as she grew.[37, 38]
9. “No extra abortions are necessary.”
Despite claims to the contrary, normal cell strains “are in fact ‘mortal’” [39], bound by the “Hayflick Limit” [40] of about 50 cell divisions. Since HEK293 becomes cancerous after time,[41] it will need replacing — just as other early cell strains did.[42] The use of vaccines eventually creates a need for further abortions to replace depleting stocks.
10. “The abortions were from decades ago.”
Though most abortions for vaccines were from before the 80s,[43, 44] time cannot make murder moral. Moreover, a new Chinese cell line, WALVAX-2 was created in 2015,[45] and as already explained, more lines will be necessary.
11. “No further babies are suffering as a result.”
While fetal tissue vaccines are widely accepted, general fetal harvesting is legitimized and impossible to ban [46, 47, 48] — so it has grown instead, leading to many more babies suffering.
For example, in 1982 a container of 16,500 fetuses was found at the US home of a former laboratory owner.[49] In 2003, the Dutch company behind HEK293 sought aborted babies as far afield as New Zealand [50] and Australia.[51] Journal articles discuss “the fetal tissue economy” in Britain.[52] In 2019, 2,200 fetuses were found at an abortionists home [53] and the court depositions of Planned Parenthood staff [54] showed harvesting continues at scale.
Moreover, both polls [55, 56, 57] (and some practice [58]) indicate that parents are more likely to choose abortion if “medical use” of a fetus is possible. Thus, if the option of having babies used for medical purposes was not available, less future babies would suffer and be aborted.
If even a percentage of the 2-3 billion nominal [59] pro-lifers rejected such vaccines, moral alternatives would be found and an “ethically, morally and biblically wrong”[60] industry might end.
12. “The ‘greater good’ outweighs concerns.”
To acquiesce with evil against an innocent unwilling victim for the sake of communal blessing enters dark waters — all historic child sacrifice is based on this premise. “However, it may then be argued that these baby body parts would otherwise be wasted, thrown away. But not only does this justify abortion, but it is pure utilitarianism, that says pretty well anything is justified as long as the end is (potentially) good. In good medical science the end does not justify the means.”[61]
Conclusion
From a Judeo-Christian perspective, the God of the Old and New Testament is set apart by not asking for the firstborn of men to die that others might live. Fetal tissue vaccines perhaps possess moral taint far beyond that of meat offered to idols.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vaccines-using-fetal-tissue-12-faulty-assumptions
Vaccines using fetal tissue: 12 faulty assumptions
Some beliefs about the morality of vaccines using fetal tissue are flawed because they rest upon faulty assumptions — thus, whichever side you stand on, it’s worth considering the most common ones.
April 1, 2021 (Fetal Tissue Vaccines) — As with the MMR [1] vaccine, the Oxford/AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine are produced in cell lines derived from abortions [2] — by contrast, Moderna and Pfizer’s vaccines used them in testing.[3]
The debate around the morality of fetal tissue vaccines frequently has at its heart three beliefs: In receiving the vaccine we are not cooperating with past evil; In receiving the vaccine we are not contributing to present or future evil; There is almost no connection between the vaccine and the murdered baby.
These beliefs are flawed because they rest upon faulty assumptions — thus, whichever side you stand on, it’s worth considering the most common ones.
1. “Only a few babies were used.”
While each individual cell line contains the cells of just one baby, many aborted babies are used in the process of creating a cell line.[4] For example, under oath, scientist Stanley Plotkin admitted that there were 76 aborted babies used in just one vaccine study.[5] Furthermore, with cell line WI-25 we know that it was the 25th specimen from the 19th baby.[6]
The two cell strains used by COVID vaccines are named HEK293 and PERC6.[7] The name HEK293 stands for a Human Embryonic Kidney from the 293rd experiment [8] — we can be confident that more babies preceded the final baby used for HEK293.[9]
2. “The babies were of a very early gestation.”
Most of the babies whose tissue formed the basis of the different vaccine cell lines, were over 3 months when aborted.[10] For example, under oath, scientist Stanley Plotkin admitted that all of the 76 unborn babies used in the study were 3 months or older.[11] At 3 months, a baby is fully formed: “she has begun swallowing and kicking … facial muscles are getting a workout as her tiny features form one expression after another …”[12]
3. “Consent was given, so usage is ethical.”
Parties to a murder cannot ethically donate the body of their victim to research. Thus it follows that no meaningful consent exists. (Though the mothers involved are often, to varying extents, victims themselves.)
4. “The baby was dead when the tissue was taken.”
With fetal tissue research, cell death renders the tissue unfit for purpose: tissues and organs must be harvested “within 5 minutes” [13, 14] and at times this occurs while the baby’s heart is still beating [15, 16] — this was also revealed during a Planned Parenthood court deposition.[17, 18]
Thus, harvesting the organs can be a type of torture [19] beyond the normal abortion procedure. Though we have no definitive proof live harvesting occurred specifically in the making of vaccine cell lines, since it is “no rare event” [20, 21, 22, 23] there are legitimate grounds for concern.[24]
5. “Some were from miscarriages.”
“The requirements for ‘freshness’ of many human foetal tissues” [25] mean it is extremely unlikely any were from miscarriages.[26] “To obtain embryo cells, embryos from spontaneous abortions cannot be used…”[27]
6. “Using a dead body is distinct from abortion.”
Some imagine that those involved in creating the cell lines have nothing to do with the abortion itself. However, in advance of the abortion of a fetus whose tissue will be used for research, there are a number of steps that take place. These include obtaining consent, conducting genetic screening,[28] selecting the abortion method [29] and other steps for optimal harvesting [30] — all of which impact the abortionist’s conduct, creating considerable interplay with the agent seeking human material, who thus “becomes to some extent an accessory”.[31] A parallel to Saul at Stephen’s stoning [32] exists — Saul didn’t throw a stone, but as a consenting bystander he was not without moral guilt.[33] In cases of live tissue extraction, research is still more directly connected to murder.
7. “No one now profits from the abortion.”
Companies who developed the cell lines continue to be rewarded by their use, including in vaccines.[34] Thus direct benefit accrues to agents complicit in the original murder.
8. “Vaccines don’t contain the child’s actual cells.”
Vaccines produced in cell lines contain fragments [35] of the child’s DNA — one study even found “a complete individual genome” [36] of the aborted child. The divided cells the vaccine was grown in would have been the child’s as she grew.[37, 38]
9. “No extra abortions are necessary.”
Despite claims to the contrary, normal cell strains “are in fact ‘mortal’” [39], bound by the “Hayflick Limit” [40] of about 50 cell divisions. Since HEK293 becomes cancerous after time,[41] it will need replacing — just as other early cell strains did.[42] The use of vaccines eventually creates a need for further abortions to replace depleting stocks.
10. “The abortions were from decades ago.”
Though most abortions for vaccines were from before the 80s,[43, 44] time cannot make murder moral. Moreover, a new Chinese cell line, WALVAX-2 was created in 2015,[45] and as already explained, more lines will be necessary.
11. “No further babies are suffering as a result.”
While fetal tissue vaccines are widely accepted, general fetal harvesting is legitimized and impossible to ban [46, 47, 48] — so it has grown instead, leading to many more babies suffering.
For example, in 1982 a container of 16,500 fetuses was found at the US home of a former laboratory owner.[49] In 2003, the Dutch company behind HEK293 sought aborted babies as far afield as New Zealand [50] and Australia.[51] Journal articles discuss “the fetal tissue economy” in Britain.[52] In 2019, 2,200 fetuses were found at an abortionists home [53] and the court depositions of Planned Parenthood staff [54] showed harvesting continues at scale.
Moreover, both polls [55, 56, 57] (and some practice [58]) indicate that parents are more likely to choose abortion if “medical use” of a fetus is possible. Thus, if the option of having babies used for medical purposes was not available, less future babies would suffer and be aborted.
If even a percentage of the 2-3 billion nominal [59] pro-lifers rejected such vaccines, moral alternatives would be found and an “ethically, morally and biblically wrong”[60] industry might end.
12. “The ‘greater good’ outweighs concerns.”
To acquiesce with evil against an innocent unwilling victim for the sake of communal blessing enters dark waters — all historic child sacrifice is based on this premise. “However, it may then be argued that these baby body parts would otherwise be wasted, thrown away. But not only does this justify abortion, but it is pure utilitarianism, that says pretty well anything is justified as long as the end is (potentially) good. In good medical science the end does not justify the means.”[61]
Conclusion
From a Judeo-Christian perspective, the God of the Old and New Testament is set apart by not asking for the firstborn of men to die that others might live. Fetal tissue vaccines perhaps possess moral taint far beyond that of meat offered to idols.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vaccines-using-fetal-tissue-12-faulty-assumptions
-
1
- Show all
There were over 1800 vaccinated at the same site and on the same day that I was. It's been almost 2 months since we got our vaccinations. None of us have grown horns or sprouted a tail. Everyone is still alive, and no one has had covid19. All of us have returned to a precovid19 world. No one has asked us for our vaccination passport.
Starting Monday, in Florida, everyone over 18 can get vaccinated. Get your vaccination. Return to a normal world.
Starting Monday, in Florida, everyone over 18 can get vaccinated. Get your vaccination. Return to a normal world.
- Status