Secondly, the Holy Spirit doesn't need to flood the atmosphere. He lives within each one of us if we're born again. This notion of "filling the atmosphere" comes from the idea of
Territorial Spirits. These are demonic spirits that rule the atmosphere of certain geographical areas. Before a city or region can be won for Christ, the territorial spirits must first be banished, or so it is taught especially by the New Apostolic Reformation.
Your line of reasoning doesn't make sense. What does the idea of the Holy Spirit 'flooding the atmosphere' have to do with territorial spirits.
Deuteronomy 32 speaks of Israel worshipping gods that are not God, shedim that their ancestors did not fear. Elsewhere, it says the gods of the nations of shedim. This translates as 'demons.' It is believed to derive from an Acadian word that may refer to 'territorial spirits.' But why would that have to do with this song requesting the Holy Spirit 'flood the atmosphere.'
This is why you are getting such a big backlash. Your conclusions are not reasonable and you are too ready to accuse people of something horrible.
As far as the idea of banishing territorial spirits go, my educated guess is that IHoP does not teach that. That sounds more like Peter Wagoner's ideas. One of the former staff pastors of a church IHOP grew out of wrote a book against some of this doctrine, considering some of the practices to be dangerous. The idea that we are supposed to get rid of principalities and powers in the heavens by rebuking them is not in the Bible. The Book of Jude should cause us to carefully examine such assertions. The weapon in the Ephesians spiritual warfare passage is the word of God. II Corinthians 10 talks about casting down imaginations and every high thought. The battle ground is the hearts and mind under the influence of these spiritual entities. I do not know Kari Jobe's personal ideas about this, but I spent some time at a church that sponsored a IHOP and I didn't hear this Peter Wagoner approach to spiritual warfare there.
The question is whether it is Biblical to ask the Spirit to 'flood the atmosphere.' Jumping to the idea of something demonic is not justified.
Would you add extra requirements to salvation? Would you say that in addition to believing the Biblical Gospel, one also has to do the following or else they receive a false spirit and not the Holy Spirit?
1. refrain from praying to or praising the Trinity
2. not experience any emotional enjoyment while praising God
3. not speak of the Holy Spirit filling a physical environment?
If these are required for salvation, why doesn't the Bible say so.
If I were writing a Christian song, I would stay away from writing songs of praise to the Holy Spirit. Jesus said, "He shall glorify Me." Some people take that and say it is inappropriate to praise the Spirit. I don't go that far. I wouldn't write lyrics, if I were a song writer, to promote doing that, but I am not going to condemn those who do.
I have also written at least one article on a forum directed toward Pentecostals and/or Charismatics questioning whether the emphasis on feeling God or feeling the Spirit in a meeting is a Biblical emphasis at all. But I do suspect some of your objections are the result of not studying the issue out.
If you consider when the temple was dedicated, the kavod of God filled the temple, the glory of God, the weightiness of God filled the temple like a cloud. The priests could not stand to minister. The Bible speaks in some places of God coming down. Moses wanted God to go before them in the desert. Moses also told God, "Show me your glory."
In Luke on one occasion, it says the power of God was present to heal the sick. The Spirit also came upon or fell upon various individuals in Acts, in some cases, those who had already been filled with the Spirit on prior occasions.
If you want to consider a doctrinal background for this, it is not territorial spirits, but rather the idea of the 'manifest presence of God'-- that while accepting the idea of omnipresence, we also see in scripture that God is specifically present on some occasions. Some Christians associate this with the presence of the Holy Spirit. Now if you want to take issue with that-- disagree with the idea of manifest presence or that that is about the Holy Spirit being present, you may do so. But the insinuations and accusations you are making isn't justified.
The NAR promotes a plan called the Seven Mountains Mandate, a form of dominionism. The idea is to take back for Christianity the seven spheres of influence now ruled by Satan and his demons. They are: government, media, family, business, education, church, and the arts. Notice the church is included in this list.
In order to take back these spheres, Christians are encouraged to do battle with the demons and cast them out. Then the doors will open for "Christianity" to step in a assume its rightful place as rulers. It stands to reason that if the leadership of the NAR (the "apostles" and "prophets") will inherit these kingdoms, they'll also inherit the church itself—theoretically at least, assuming their plan succeeds.
Again, Peter Wagner was into dominionism. There are some churches that are into that, and some churches are really into the '7 mountains' idea. There are also those who can appreciate the idea of Christians being salt and light in these various arenas without holding to a kingdom now, post-mil like eschatology... or the idea that principalities are supposed to be cast out of the heavens rather than cast out of people who are demonized.
You might find an individual at IHOP who accepts some of these ideas. I think IHOPs tend to be post-tribulation or historical millennial in their eschatology, not post-mil.
There are also different views on 'apostleship.' I don't care much for what I consider the NAR view on apostles. But there are others who recognize the use of the Greek word translated 'apostle' to refer to individuals sent with authority, and there are those who see an expression of it among those who plant churches. The A/G has a loose idea of an 'apostolic function' , in one of their position papers. Watchman Nee, some in the Brethren movement, even some Baptists and some in the house church movement recognize this use of the term 'apostle'. There may be some other Charismatics and Pentecostals who hold to this view. But it isn't the same as NAR thought on the issue.
Rather than casting out the demons, IMO the demons are actually helping them.
This looks like the opposite of Pascal's wager. Are you rather excited about the idea that if with your quick and easy approach to accusations, that if you make a wrong judgment and call the Holy Spirit a demon, that you may have no forgiveness in this age or in the age to come for that sin against the Holy Spirit?
No doubt I'll be labeled further as crazy or a complainer. That's okay. This is a real thing and all anyone has to do is look into it. I'm not sure if the Seven Mountains Mandate will succeed or fail; I don't really care. My whole point is to simply show where this idea of conjuring the "Holy Spirit" to fill the atmosphere comes from. It has gotten so far from preaching the gospel and making disciples it's absurd.
I see a combination of two things here. One is that you do not know that much about what you are talking about, and the other is the unreasonably harsh judgments.
2
1
