Saved by Water

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
Thanks for pointing out those scripture verses in Luke 8 that state Simon did believe Philip's message and therefore submitted to water baptism in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Once again, no one is arguing against water baptism.

The argument is about what it is FOR. It's NOT to get saved, NOT to receive the Holy Spirit.

I can only conclude from your other comments that you do not agree that a person must also receive the Holy Ghost, as the group did in Acts 8:17, in order to be saved.
You must not read my posts very carefully then. When a person believes in Christ, they POSSESS eternal life (Jn 5:24), they become children of God (Jn 1:12, Gal 3:26) they are sealed with the Holy Spirit (Eph 1:13,14) and they are forgiven of their sins (Acts 10:43).

In fact, a person CANNOT believe for salvation and NOT receive the Holy Spirit. God gives the Spirit. It is described as a gift in Acts 11.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,820
1,040
113
Once again, no one is arguing against water baptism.

The argument is about what it is FOR. It's NOT to get saved, NOT to receive the Holy Spirit.


You must not read my posts very carefully then. When a person believes in Christ, they POSSESS eternal life (Jn 5:24), they become children of God (Jn 1:12, Gal 3:26) they are sealed with the Holy Spirit (Eph 1:13,14) and they are forgiven of their sins (Acts 10:43).

In fact, a person CANNOT believe for salvation and NOT receive the Holy Spirit. God gives the Spirit. It is described as a gift in Acts 11.
I pointed out that the Samaritans received the Holy Ghost in verse 17 with the assistance of Peter and John. Not prior to that.

Another scripture that makes this point is Acts 19:1. If a person automatically received the Holy Ghost when they believed the gospel message there would have been no need for Paul to ask the following: "Have you received the Holy Ghost SINCE you believed?" His question makes the point that one's belief alone does not always prompt one's receiving of the Holy Ghost as was seen in the case of the Gentiles conversion.

In both the Samaritan and Gentile experiences one can easily conclude that God's timing in giving the Holy Ghost was for specific purposes:

1. If God had not poured out the Holy Ghost on the Gentiles Peter may have hesitated to allow the group to be water baptized in the name of the Lord. This statement is not far fetched when it is understood that sins are remitted in water baptism as Peter stated in Acts. 2:38.

2. John accompanied Peter to assist in the Samaritans receiving the Holy Ghost. It should be noted that John was one of those who asked Jesus if he would let him call down fire from Heaven to destroy those in a Samaritan village that would not receive Jesus. (Luke 9:52-54) It is not unrealistic to believe Jesus used John to assist in the arrival of the Holy Ghost from Heaven that would bring life not death to the Samaritans.

Also, it should be noted that belief and obedience are common to all of the scriptures you referenced when taken in context.
 
S

SophieT

Guest
My comment was relative to what Jesus said: "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned." Mark 16:16

Jesus said he who believes and is baptized shall be saved. He did not say get baptized after you're saved.

My comment:
"Those who do not believe in Jesus are in fact condemned already; they would have no intention of getting baptized in the first place. However, on the other hand those who believe are expected to realize water baptism in the name of Jesus is required and obey the command. In doing so, as Jesus said those believers shall be saved."

you're beating a dead horse wansvic

you simply repeat the same error over and over

guess you don't have anything else
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
I pointed out that the Samaritans received the Holy Ghost in verse 17 with the assistance of Peter and John. Not prior to that.
You have already acknowledged that the order varied during the very early formation of the church.

Another scripture that makes this point is Acts 19:1. If a person automatically received the Holy Ghost when they believed the gospel message there would have been no need for Paul to ask the following: "Have you received the Holy Ghost SINCE you believed?" His question makes the point that one's belief alone does not always prompt one's receiving of the Holy Ghost as was seen in the case of the Gentiles conversion.
Still during the eary formation of the church. But, by the time Paul wrote Gal 3:2,5 the pattern was solid: reception of the Spirit was by faith. NO mention of water.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,820
1,040
113
You have already acknowledged that the order varied during the very early formation of the church.


Still during the eary formation of the church. But, by the time Paul wrote Gal 3:2,5 the pattern was solid: reception of the Spirit was by faith. NO mention of water.
Although we do not agree. I thank you and appreciate having a friendly discussion.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
Although we do not agree. I thank you and appreciate having a friendly discussion.
How come you don't agree that Paul noted the pattern for receiving the Holy Spirit in Gal 3:2,5?

And you are welcome.

Merry Christmas!
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,820
1,040
113
How come you don't agree that Paul noted the pattern for receiving the Holy Spirit in Gal 3:2,5?

And you are welcome.

Merry Christmas!
Hope you are having a Merry Christmas!

In answer to your question, Paul was specifically addressing the error that Galatians had to comply with the OT mandate of circumcision in addition to the NT commands. His point about receiving the Holy Spirit through hearing and believing the gospel message in no way negates the need to be water baptized. Being water baptized in the name of Jesus and repenting are actually required steps of faith prompted from hearing and believing the same message; they are part of the message. (Rom. 1:16-17)

In addition, bible chronology indicates that Paul wrote to the Galatians while in Ephesus. Paul's message to the Ephesians of the need to be water baptized in the name of Jesus and receive the Holy Ghost occurred during that same time frame. Therefore, to conclude anything had changed cannot be correct.

Paul went to Galatia and strengthened the disciples as referenced in Acts 18:23. Afterward we see Paul's interaction with the Ephesus disciples in Acts 19:1-6.

It is commonly understood that Paul wrote to the Galatians from Ephesus where he stayed for 3 years. It makes sense then that during Paul's stay he heard of the Galatians error and wrote to them. Surely Paul was surprised that the Galatians he had just taken the time to strengthen (Acts 18:23) were being led to believe they had to follow the OT mandate of circumcision, as well, in order to be accepted of God.

Something else that is notable in this record pertains to Apollos. Notice verses 24-25. Apollos was instructed in the way of the Lord and fervent in the spirit, but just as with the Ephesus disciples, he only knew of John's baptism. Verse 26 states that Aquila and Priscilla explained to Apollos the way of God more perfectly. (Acts 18:24-26) Although the record does not specifically state he was told of the need to be water baptized in the name of Jesus one can conclude that to be the case. Especially, since shortly thereafter it is recorded that Paul addressed the same issue in Acts 19:1-6.


I have included the scripture for your convenience in confirming the stated sequence of events:

Acts 18:19-19:8
19 And he (Paul) came to Ephesus, and left them there (Aquila and Priscilla): but he himself entered into the synagogue, and reasoned with the Jews.
20 When they desired him to tarry longer time with them, he consented not;
21 But bade them farewell, saying, I must by all means keep this feast that cometh in Jerusalem: but I will return again unto you, if God will. And he sailed from Ephesus.
22 And when he had landed at Caesarea, and gone up, and saluted the church, he went down to Antioch.
23 And after he had spent some time there, he departed, and went over all the country of Galatia and Phrygia in order, strengthening all the disciples.
24 And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus.
25 This man was instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in the spirit, he spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord, knowing only the baptism of John.
26 And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly.
27 And when he was disposed to pass into Achaia, the brethren wrote, exhorting the disciples to receive him: who, when he was come, helped them much which had believed through grace:
28 For he mightily convinced the Jews, and that publickly, shewing by the scriptures that Jesus was Christ.


Acts 19
And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples,
2 He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.
3 And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.
4 Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.
5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.
7 And all the men were about twelve.
8 And he went into the synagogue, and spake boldly for the space of three months, disputing and persuading the things concerning the kingdom of God.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
Hope you are having a Merry Christmas!
I am, and thank you.

In answer to your question, Paul was specifically addressing the error that Galatians had to comply with the OT mandate of circumcision in addition to the NT commands. His point about receiving the Holy Spirit through hearing and believing the gospel message in no way negates the need to be water baptized.
No one argues the "need to be baptized". The question is "for what"? It is not salvation. Over and out. It is part of the public confession of being a believer in Jesus Messiah. iow, it is a command of witness. Believers are to share their faith.

Regarding repentance, the Greek means "a change of mind". That automatically occurs when a person hears the gospel message and believes it. Prior to hearing the gospel, a person may have any manner of ideas about heaven and hell, or even if either one exists.

But, after hearing the gospel, if convicted of their sins, the person does believe in Christ for salvation, they HAVE changed their minds about their former ideas. So there is no need to emphasize repentance, as if it is something in addition to believing in Christ.

Being water baptized in the name of Jesus and repenting are actually required steps of faith prompted from hearing and believing the same message; they are part of the message. (Rom. 1:16-17)
16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who believes: first to the Jew, then to the Gentile.
17 For in the gospel the righteousness of God is revealed—a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written: “The righteous will live by faith.”

Interesting verse. No mention of water baptism at all. And interesting that the verse were written by Paul, the same man who answered the jailer's question about what he MUST DO to be saved. Which was, "believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved".

Now, if one thinks that Paul really believed what you think he believed, why didn't he mention water baptism in either Rom 1 or Acts 16:31? That should strike you as rather odd.

In addition, bible chronology indicates that Paul wrote to the Galatians while in Ephesus. Paul's message to the Ephesians of the need to be water baptized in the name of Jesus and receive the Holy Ghost occurred during that same time frame. Therefore, to conclude anything had changed cannot be correct.
Please quote the verses that support your claim here. Thanks. I haven't seen any verses from Paul that support your comment.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,820
1,040
113
Please quote the verses that support your claim here. Thanks. I haven't seen any verses from Paul that support your comment.
My points were in regard to your reply to me in Post 2584, "Still during the eary formation of the church. But, by the time Paul wrote Gal 3:2,5 the pattern was solid: reception of the Spirit was by faith."

Notice in Acts 18:23 Paul strengthens the Galatians just prior to traveling to Ephesus: "And after he had spent some time there, he departed, and went over all the country of Galatia and Phrygia in order, strengthening all the disciples."

Shortly afterward, Paul asks the question of the Ephesians that indicates a person does not automatically receive the Holy Ghost when they believe. Paul tells them they must believe on Christ Jesus. The group does not receive the Holy Ghost at that point. We know the group believed Paul because they obeyed Paul's command to be baptized in Jesus' name, and afterward Paul lays hands upon them at which time they receive the Holy Ghost. (Acts 19:1-6)
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
Please quote the verses that support your claim here. Thanks. I haven't seen any verses from Paul that support your comment.
My points were in regard to your reply to me in Post 2584, "Still during the eary formation of the church. But, by the time Paul wrote Gal 3:2,5 the pattern was solid: reception of the Spirit was by faith."
This is what I was requesting from you:
" Paul's message to the Ephesians of the need to be water baptized in the name of Jesus and receive the Holy Ghost occurred during that same time frame. Therefore, to conclude anything had changed cannot be correct."

Notice in Acts 18:23 Paul strengthens the Galatians just prior to traveling to Ephesus: "And after he had spent some time there, he departed, and went over all the country of Galatia and Phrygia in order, strengthening all the disciples."
This does not support your claim.

Shortly afterward, Paul asks the question of the Ephesians that indicates a person does not automatically receive the Holy Ghost when they believe.
What question and what verse does Paul ask a question ot the Ephesians that indicates a person does not automatially receive thr Holy Spirt when they believe? Paul makes clear HOW a person receives the Holy Spirit in Gal 3:28.

Do you think Paul told different audiences different messages?

Paul tells them they must believe on Christ Jesus.
For salvation and reception of the Spirit, that's all he told them to do.

The group does not receive the Holy Ghost at that point.
What group? And what epistle are you referring to?

We know the group believed Paul because they obeyed Paul's command to be baptized in Jesus' name, and afterward Paul lays hands upon them at which time they receive the Holy Ghost. (Acts 19:1-6)
STILL an early part of the formation of the NT church.

by the late 40's or early 50's, Paul's message was clear; believe the gospel to receive the Holy Spirit. Gal 3:26.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,820
1,040
113
What question and what verse does Paul ask a question ot the Ephesians that indicates a person does not automatially receive thr Holy Spirt when they believe? Paul makes clear HOW a person receives the Holy Spirit in Gal 3:28.

What group? And what epistle are you referring to?.
The question - Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? Acts 19:2


The 12 Ephesians were told about Jesus. (They did not receive the Holy Ghost at that point)
They obeyed the command to be water baptized in the name of Jesus. (They did not receive the Holy Ghost at that point)
Then Paul laid hands upon them and they received the Holy Ghost. (Acts 19:4-6)



STILL an early part of the formation of the NT church.

by the late 40's or early 50's, Paul's message was clear; believe the gospel to receive the Holy Spirit. Gal 3:26.
According to bible chronology Paul's question to the Ephesian disciples and the corresponding actions occurred around the same time he wrote Galatians. Both happened during Paul's third missionary journey, (52-56) as recorded in Acts 18:23-21:17. Therefore, Paul's message remained the same. Believing in Jesus, repenting, being water baptized in the name of Jesus, and receiving the Holy Ghost are all part of the NT gospel message. What Paul was specifically addressing in Galatians was the error that the OT circumcision was an additional requirement. Paul makes it clear that adding the OT requirement to be circumcised was to teach another gospel. (Gal 1:6)
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
What question and what verse does Paul ask a question ot the Ephesians that indicates a person does not automatially receive thr Holy Spirt when they believe? Paul makes clear HOW a person receives the Holy Spirit in Gal 3:28.

What group? And what epistle are you referring to?.
The question - Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? Acts 19:2
Not a legitimate question today. Paul solidified the issue in Gal 3:2,5. Everyone who believes receives the Holy Spirit THEN.

The 12 Ephesians were told about Jesus. (They did not receive the Holy Ghost at that point)
Not a legitimate issue today. Let's move on.

According to bible chronology Paul's question to the Ephesian disciples and the corresponding actions occurred around the same time he wrote Galatians.
No, it's not. You are just assuming. You have NO IDEA when Acts 19 occurred.

Both happened during Paul's third missionary journey, (52-56) as recorded in Acts 18:23-21:17.
How do you know that was Paul's 3rd journey?

Therefore, Paul's message remained the same.
No, it wasn't. By Gal 3:2,5 the pattern was solidified. The Holy Spirit is received WHEN a person believes. Period.

Believing in Jesus, repenting, being water baptized in the name of Jesus, and receiving the Holy Ghost are all part of the NT gospel message.
You are stuck on verses that relate ONLY TO the beginning of the formation of the church.

Why didn't Paul tell the jailer he needed to be water baptized as part of being saved/receiving the Spirit?

And why did Cornelius receive the Holy Spirit BEFORE he was water baptized? You can't answer that.

In fact, the text is clear that Peter didn't even bring up water baptism UNTIL there was evidence that Cornelius and household HAD already believed and received the Spirit. More Scripture that you can't explain.

What Paul was specifically addressing in Galatians was the error that the OT circumcision was an additional requirement.
Not in Gal 3:2,5. No mention of circumcision there.

Paul makes it clear that adding the OT requirement to be circumcised was to teach another gospel. (Gal 1:6)
Yeah, that was at the beginning of the epistle. By the time we get to ch 3, there is NO MENTION of circumcision.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,820
1,040
113
...16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who believes: first to the Jew, then to the Gentile.
17 For in the gospel the righteousness of God is revealed—a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written: “The righteous will live by faith.”

Interesting verse. No mention of water baptism at all. And interesting that the verse were written by Paul, the same man who answered the jailer's question about what he MUST DO to be saved. Which was, "believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved"...
The gospel of Christ is a message that includes the need to believe multiple things by faith. An individual's trust in God is witnessed by their obedience to His commands.

According to Romans 1:17, it is in the gospel that the righteousness of God is revealed; how God makes people righteous. This is seen in the gospel message presented on the Day of Pentecost and evidenced through obedience elsewhere in scripture. After the group believed Peter's account concerning who Jesus was, they were told what they must do. (Acts 2:37-38) Although all of the things Peter stated are necessary, the order in which they occur varies. (Acts 2:38-41, 8:12-18, 9:17-18, 10:44-48, 19:1-6, 22:16)

Everyone is to:
Repent; make a conscience decision to turn away from sin and turn to God.
Be water baptized. The record specifically states it is to be done in the name of the Lord Jesus for the remission of sin.
Receive the indwelling of the Holy Ghost

Note the association between these instructions and Jesus' death, burial and resurrection. There is death in repentance, a burial with Jesus in water baptism, and receiving of resurrection power through the indwelling of the Holy Ghost.

And most importantly, none of this would even be possible without Jesus having shed His blood for all of mankind!



Rom 1:16-17
16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
KJV
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,820
1,040
113
FreeGrace2 said:
What question and what verse does Paul ask a question ot the Ephesians that indicates a person does not automatially receive thr Holy Spirt when they believe? Paul makes clear HOW a person receives the Holy Spirit in Gal 3:28.

What group? And what epistle are you referring to?.

Not a legitimate question today. Paul solidified the issue in Gal 3:2,5. Everyone who believes receives the Holy Spirit THEN.


Not a legitimate issue today. Let's move on.


No, it's not. You are just assuming. You have NO IDEA when Acts 19 occurred.


How do you know that was Paul's 3rd journey?...
There are many publications that address bible chronology. I personally use the Jensen's Survey of the New Testament and refer to others as well for confirmation.

The following may help you understand the points I've made. It is lengthy but worth the read to understand the timeline:

The first journey begins when Paul, Barnabas, and Mark set out from Antioch (Acts 13:4). This journey started after 44 AD and ended a "long time" (Acts 14:28) before 50 AD.

They left Antioch for Seleucia and sailed to Cyprus, large island 100 miles off Syrian coast. There they went to Salamis and Paphos where Paul met Bar-Jesus the sorcerer. (Acts 13:4-6).

Then they sail to Perga in Pamphylia, which is now southern Turkey. From here, Mark returns to Jerusalem.

At Antioch in Pisidia (not to be confused with the one in Syria), Paul and Barnabas turn to the Gentiles (Acts 13:46).

Then it was on to Iconium, where they abode a "long time" (Acts 14:3), Lystra, where Paul stoned, but lives (Acts 14:19), and Derbe. Then they retraced their steps back through Lystra, Iconium, and Antioch (in Pisidia) (Acts 14:21).

Paul and Barnabas went throughout Pisidia, Pamphylia, then to Perga, Attalia, and sailed back to Antioch in Syria (Acts 14:24-26)

The first journey ends in Antioch, Syria, where Paul and Barnabas stay there a long time (Acts 14:28).

The dates for the events from 50-60 AD are found by counting backwards from the succession of Felix's reign as Procurator in Judea by Porcius Festus in 60 AD. Should one want to check these dates for accuracy, one should start at 60 AD and work backwards.

In about 50 AD, Paul and Barnabas go to the council in Jerusalem 14 years after Paul's conversion (Galatians 2:1-9 and Acts 15:2).

Judas and Silas return to Antioch (Syria) with Barnabas and Paul where they continued some days (Acts 15:35-36), possibly in the winter of 50-51 AD.


The second journey begins, possibly in the spring of 51 AD. Paul takes Silas through Syria and Cilicia (now southeastern Turkey).

They came to Derbe and Lystra, where they find Timothy, who goes with Paul and Silas throughout Phrygia and Galatia. But they are forbidden by the Spirit to go into Asia or Bithynia. They passed through Mysia to Troas, the island of Samothracia, and then to Neapolis in Macedonia (now northern Greece).

At Philippi, God opens the heart of Lydia and the Philippian jailer (Acts 16:14-34).

Passing through Amphipolis and Appolonia, they came to Thessalonica, where Paul taught for 3 weeks.

After teaching some in Berea, Paul departed ahead of Silas and Timothy, southward into Achaia (now southern Greece), to Athens, possibly for the winter of 51-52 AD (Acts 17:14-15).

Paul then makes his first visit to Corinth where he stays a year and a half (Acts 18:1, 5, 11). This may have been from the spring of 52 AD to the fall of 53 AD. Here, Paul met Aquila and Priscilla, who had just come from Rome, from which Claudius Caesar had banished all Jews. Silas and Timothy rejoin Paul. First Thessalonians was written from here in about 52 AD (1 Thessalonians 3:1-2, 6). We know that it was written from Corinth, and not from Athens, because Silas and Timothy had already rejoined Paul (1 Thessalonians 1:1 and Acts 18:5). Second Thessalonians was also written from Corinth. We know that it was soon after the first letter, because like the first letter, Silas was with Paul when second Thessalonians was written. After Paul leaves Corinth, there is no further mention of Silas traveling with Paul.

Paul left by boat with Aquila and Priscilla to Cenchrea and then across the Aegean Sea to Ephesus. Aquila and Priscilla stay there where they would later meet Apollos (Acts 18:19 and 26).

Paul sails on to Caesarea and then goes up to Antioch in Syria, where the second journey ends. Paul stayed a while (Acts 18:23). This may have been the winter of 53-54 AD.


The third journey begins with Galatia (central region of Turkey) possibly in the spring of 54 AD and then Phrygia (Acts 18:23).

Then Paul arrives at Ephesus where he stayed for 3 years (Acts 20:31) probably from the fall of 54 AD to the fall of 57 AD. Paul meets disciples of John the Baptist. He preached in the synagogue for 3 months (Acts 19:8). He disputed daily in the school of Tyrannus for 2 years (Acts 19:9-10), so that all that dwelt in Asia heard the word. Paul sent Timothy and Erastus ahead into Macedonia, but Paul stayed in Asia for a season (Acts 19:22). Paul wrote 1 Corinthians near the end of this stay in Ephesus (1 Corinthians 16:8,19), probably in 57 AD. It was not written with Timothy, who Paul had sent ahead into Macedonia (Acts 19:22). Paul foresaw his route of travel for the next four or so years in Acts 19:21-22. This agrees with his plans in 1 Corinthians 16:1, 3, 5, 8-10. Note how the "great door" opened to Paul and "many adversaries" in verse 9 compares with the events in the Ephesian amphitheater in Acts 19:23-41. In 1 Corinthians 3:6, Paul says "Apollos watered". This refers to Apollos teaching in Corinth when Paul was at Ephesus (Acts 19:1).

Paul had rejoined Timothy when Second Corinthians was written (2 Corinthians 1:1). Paul had come to Troas and continued to Macedonia (2 Corinthians 2:12-13 and 7:5), where he was joined by Titus (2 Corinthians 7:6 & 13), which seems to correspond to Acts 20:1. Paul also talks of a third visit to Corinth in 2 Corinthians 13:1 and 12:14. So Second Corinthians was most likely written in the fall of 57 AD from somewhere in Macedonia (northern Greece), possibly at Philippi.

In 2 Corinthians 12:1-4, Paul says 14 years ago I ascended into heaven. From 57, going back 14 years to 43 AD, this puts us back before Paul's first journey, probably when he was at Antioch in Syria.

After going through Macedonia (northern Greece), Paul came to Achaia (southern Greece) where he stayed 3 months (Acts 20:2-3), making third visit to Corinth. This is where he spent the winter of 57-58 AD (1 Corinthians 16:5-8). Romans was written at this time (Rom 15:23-26 and 1 Corinthians 16:1-3).

Going back to Macedonia (Acts 20:1), they were at Philippi (northeastern Greece) in spring of 58 AD in the "days of unleavened bread" (Acts 20:6).

Then they sailed to Troas, where a young man fell out of a window, and Paul raises him from the dead (Acts 20:7-12).

Then Paul went to Assos, Mitylene, Chios, Samos, Trogylium, and Miletus (now in southwestern Turkey). From here, Paul addresses Ephesian elders whom he had called to meet him (Acts 20:17-38) in the spring of 58 AD (Acts 20:16).

Sailing to Coos, Rhodes, Patara, and passing on the south side of Cyprus, they came to Tyre (which is now in Lebanon) where they stayed one week. Then they went south to Ptolemais and to Caesarea where they stayed many days (Acts 21:10). Then Paul goes to Jerusalem, where the third journey ends.


Here let us pause to look at the question: When was Galatians written? Galatians was written when Paul was not in prison and when neither Silas or Timothy were with him (Galatians 1:1). It was written after the council in Jerusalem (Acts 15:1-32 and Galatians 2:1-10) and after Paul's second visit to the region on his second journey in about 51 AD (Acts 16:1-6). Since they were "so soon removed" from grace (Galatians 1:6), it must have been before the prison years of 58-63 AD. So it could have been written when Paul was alone in Athens in the winter of 51-52 AD, which would make it Paul's first letter. But this is unlikely, since Paul was only in Athens a short time (Acts 17:15). Or it could have been written from Antioch between Paul's second and third journeys in the winter of 53-54 AD (Acts 18:22-23). But this is also unlikely because Paul would have probably mentioned that he would be coming to them soon on his third journey. It could have been written from Corinth in the winter of 57-58 where Paul wrote Romans. But most likely, it was written from Ephesus during Paul's 3 years there from 54-57. Paul had recently passed through the region of Galatia "... strengthening all the disciples ..." (Acts 18:23) and spent far more time in Ephesus where he could have gotten the unfavorable report about the churches in Galatia (Galatians 1:6) which was relatively nearby.

from Matthewmcgee.org/paultime.html
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,820
1,040
113
Not in Gal 3:2,5. No mention of circumcision there.


Yeah, that was at the beginning of the epistle. By the time we get to ch 3, there is NO MENTION of circumcision.
In order to understand the specific scripture verses referenced requires the examination of the circumstances that prompted Paul's statement. It is in this evaluation that the error is found. The Galatian church members were being fooled into believing that the OT circumcision procedure was still a requirement in order to be accepted of God.

Paul begins to address the problem he had been informed about in Gal 1:6: "I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:"

In chapter 1, Paul points out that he as a devout Jew refused to accept the New Testament gospel message. And persecuted those who did otherwise.

Gal 1:23 speaks to Paul's preaching being the same as the original apostles: "...That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed."

Gal 2:3 points out circumcision was not required of those in the New Testament. And trying to be justified by an Old Testament law was in fact not going to happen. (Gal 2:16)

Gal 3:2 makes the point that receiving the Spirit comes from having faith in what was heard; believing the message. And believing the message in its entirety prompts obedience to its stated requirements, of which OT circumcision plays no part.

Placing one's faith in Jesus is seen through obedience to the requirements stated in the NT where we are assured of receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost. (Acts 2:37-38)

According to Hebrews 5:9, Jesus is the author of eternal salvation to all those who obey Him.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
There are many publications that address bible chronology. I personally use the Jensen's Survey of the New Testament and refer to others as well for confirmation.

The following may help you understand the points I've made. It is lengthy but worth the read to understand the timeline:

The first journey begins when Paul, Barnabas, and Mark set out from Antioch (Acts 13:4). This journey started after 44 AD and ended a "long time" (Acts 14:28) before 50 AD.

They left Antioch for Seleucia and sailed to Cyprus, large island 100 miles off Syrian coast. There they went to Salamis and Paphos where Paul met Bar-Jesus the sorcerer. (Acts 13:4-6).

Then they sail to Perga in Pamphylia, which is now southern Turkey. From here, Mark returns to Jerusalem.

At Antioch in Pisidia (not to be confused with the one in Syria), Paul and Barnabas turn to the Gentiles (Acts 13:46).

Then it was on to Iconium, where they abode a "long time" (Acts 14:3), Lystra, where Paul stoned, but lives (Acts 14:19), and Derbe. Then they retraced their steps back through Lystra, Iconium, and Antioch (in Pisidia) (Acts 14:21).

Paul and Barnabas went throughout Pisidia, Pamphylia, then to Perga, Attalia, and sailed back to Antioch in Syria (Acts 14:24-26)

The first journey ends in Antioch, Syria, where Paul and Barnabas stay there a long time (Acts 14:28).

The dates for the events from 50-60 AD are found by counting backwards from the succession of Felix's reign as Procurator in Judea by Porcius Festus in 60 AD. Should one want to check these dates for accuracy, one should start at 60 AD and work backwards.

In about 50 AD, Paul and Barnabas go to the council in Jerusalem 14 years after Paul's conversion (Galatians 2:1-9 and Acts 15:2).

Judas and Silas return to Antioch (Syria) with Barnabas and Paul where they continued some days (Acts 15:35-36), possibly in the winter of 50-51 AD.


The second journey begins, possibly in the spring of 51 AD. Paul takes Silas through Syria and Cilicia (now southeastern Turkey).

They came to Derbe and Lystra, where they find Timothy, who goes with Paul and Silas throughout Phrygia and Galatia. But they are forbidden by the Spirit to go into Asia or Bithynia. They passed through Mysia to Troas, the island of Samothracia, and then to Neapolis in Macedonia (now northern Greece).

At Philippi, God opens the heart of Lydia and the Philippian jailer (Acts 16:14-34).

Passing through Amphipolis and Appolonia, they came to Thessalonica, where Paul taught for 3 weeks.

After teaching some in Berea, Paul departed ahead of Silas and Timothy, southward into Achaia (now southern Greece), to Athens, possibly for the winter of 51-52 AD (Acts 17:14-15).

Paul then makes his first visit to Corinth where he stays a year and a half (Acts 18:1, 5, 11). This may have been from the spring of 52 AD to the fall of 53 AD. Here, Paul met Aquila and Priscilla, who had just come from Rome, from which Claudius Caesar had banished all Jews. Silas and Timothy rejoin Paul. First Thessalonians was written from here in about 52 AD (1 Thessalonians 3:1-2, 6). We know that it was written from Corinth, and not from Athens, because Silas and Timothy had already rejoined Paul (1 Thessalonians 1:1 and Acts 18:5). Second Thessalonians was also written from Corinth. We know that it was soon after the first letter, because like the first letter, Silas was with Paul when second Thessalonians was written. After Paul leaves Corinth, there is no further mention of Silas traveling with Paul.

Paul left by boat with Aquila and Priscilla to Cenchrea and then across the Aegean Sea to Ephesus. Aquila and Priscilla stay there where they would later meet Apollos (Acts 18:19 and 26).

Paul sails on to Caesarea and then goes up to Antioch in Syria, where the second journey ends. Paul stayed a while (Acts 18:23). This may have been the winter of 53-54 AD.


The third journey begins with Galatia (central region of Turkey) possibly in the spring of 54 AD and then Phrygia (Acts 18:23).

Then Paul arrives at Ephesus where he stayed for 3 years (Acts 20:31) probably from the fall of 54 AD to the fall of 57 AD. Paul meets disciples of John the Baptist. He preached in the synagogue for 3 months (Acts 19:8). He disputed daily in the school of Tyrannus for 2 years (Acts 19:9-10), so that all that dwelt in Asia heard the word. Paul sent Timothy and Erastus ahead into Macedonia, but Paul stayed in Asia for a season (Acts 19:22). Paul wrote 1 Corinthians near the end of this stay in Ephesus (1 Corinthians 16:8,19), probably in 57 AD. It was not written with Timothy, who Paul had sent ahead into Macedonia (Acts 19:22). Paul foresaw his route of travel for the next four or so years in Acts 19:21-22. This agrees with his plans in 1 Corinthians 16:1, 3, 5, 8-10. Note how the "great door" opened to Paul and "many adversaries" in verse 9 compares with the events in the Ephesian amphitheater in Acts 19:23-41. In 1 Corinthians 3:6, Paul says "Apollos watered". This refers to Apollos teaching in Corinth when Paul was at Ephesus (Acts 19:1).

Paul had rejoined Timothy when Second Corinthians was written (2 Corinthians 1:1). Paul had come to Troas and continued to Macedonia (2 Corinthians 2:12-13 and 7:5), where he was joined by Titus (2 Corinthians 7:6 & 13), which seems to correspond to Acts 20:1. Paul also talks of a third visit to Corinth in 2 Corinthians 13:1 and 12:14. So Second Corinthians was most likely written in the fall of 57 AD from somewhere in Macedonia (northern Greece), possibly at Philippi.

In 2 Corinthians 12:1-4, Paul says 14 years ago I ascended into heaven. From 57, going back 14 years to 43 AD, this puts us back before Paul's first journey, probably when he was at Antioch in Syria.

After going through Macedonia (northern Greece), Paul came to Achaia (southern Greece) where he stayed 3 months (Acts 20:2-3), making third visit to Corinth. This is where he spent the winter of 57-58 AD (1 Corinthians 16:5-8). Romans was written at this time (Rom 15:23-26 and 1 Corinthians 16:1-3).

Going back to Macedonia (Acts 20:1), they were at Philippi (northeastern Greece) in spring of 58 AD in the "days of unleavened bread" (Acts 20:6).

Then they sailed to Troas, where a young man fell out of a window, and Paul raises him from the dead (Acts 20:7-12).

Then Paul went to Assos, Mitylene, Chios, Samos, Trogylium, and Miletus (now in southwestern Turkey). From here, Paul addresses Ephesian elders whom he had called to meet him (Acts 20:17-38) in the spring of 58 AD (Acts 20:16).

Sailing to Coos, Rhodes, Patara, and passing on the south side of Cyprus, they came to Tyre (which is now in Lebanon) where they stayed one week. Then they went south to Ptolemais and to Caesarea where they stayed many days (Acts 21:10). Then Paul goes to Jerusalem, where the third journey ends.


Here let us pause to look at the question: When was Galatians written? Galatians was written when Paul was not in prison and when neither Silas or Timothy were with him (Galatians 1:1). It was written after the council in Jerusalem (Acts 15:1-32 and Galatians 2:1-10) and after Paul's second visit to the region on his second journey in about 51 AD (Acts 16:1-6). Since they were "so soon removed" from grace (Galatians 1:6), it must have been before the prison years of 58-63 AD. So it could have been written when Paul was alone in Athens in the winter of 51-52 AD, which would make it Paul's first letter. But this is unlikely, since Paul was only in Athens a short time (Acts 17:15). Or it could have been written from Antioch between Paul's second and third journeys in the winter of 53-54 AD (Acts 18:22-23). But this is also unlikely because Paul would have probably mentioned that he would be coming to them soon on his third journey. It could have been written from Corinth in the winter of 57-58 where Paul wrote Romans. But most likely, it was written from Ephesus during Paul's 3 years there from 54-57. Paul had recently passed through the region of Galatia "... strengthening all the disciples ..." (Acts 18:23) and spent far more time in Ephesus where he could have gotten the unfavorable report about the churches in Galatia (Galatians 1:6) which was relatively nearby.

from Matthewmcgee.org/paultime.html
Thanks for making my point. By the time Paul wrote to the Galatians, it was in the early 50's, which is 2 decades AFTER the start of the NT church.

And, by that time, the pattern for receiving the Spirit was established. The Spirit is received by faith. Not by water baptism.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
According to Hebrews 5:9, Jesus is the author of eternal salvation to all those who obey Him.
And here, to obey refers to believing the gospel.

You are quite stubborn, and seem unfazed by the facts that have been presented to you.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,820
1,040
113
Thanks for making my point. By the time Paul wrote to the Galatians, it was in the early 50's, which is 2 decades AFTER the start of the NT church.

And, by that time, the pattern for receiving the Spirit was established. The Spirit is received by faith. Not by water baptism.
As I told you before, according to the word the Holy Ghost is not received in water baptism. Water baptism is necessary, and so is receiving the Holy Ghost. Neither is dependent on the other; however, both are required and the sequence varies according to scripture.

For some reason you are not seeing what should be obvious. Paul's message to the Ephesus disciples happened around the same time Galatians was written. To say that Paul gave the two groups a different message is not accurate.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,820
1,040
113
And here, to obey refers to believing the gospel.

You are quite stubborn, and seem unfazed by the facts that have been presented to you.
As I said previously we do not agree. However, praise God. His Word does not return void it will accomplish its purpose. Thanks for the discussion.