In classic DF thinking the Millennium is really a point at which the parenthetical church age closes and the dispensation of Law returns, albeit with Christ supervising bodily.
Wrote no Apostle ever...
Wrote no Apostle ever...
What the heck is DFIn classic DF thinking the Millennium is really a point at which the parenthetical church age closes and the dispensation of Law returns, albeit with Christ supervising bodily.
Wrote no Apostle ever...
DF?In classic DF thinking the Millennium is really a point at which the parenthetical church age closes and the dispensation of Law returns, albeit with Christ supervising bodily.
Wrote no Apostle ever...
There are not many prominent "classic" Dispensationalists around, so it's not really worth the discussion.In classic DF thinking the Millennium is really a point at which the parenthetical church age closes and the dispensation of Law returns, albeit with Christ supervising bodily.
Dispensatioanl Futurism
True enough but they never were monolithic and Scofield still has a great deal of influence.There are not many prominent "classic" Dispensationalists around, so it's not really worth the discussion.
Most Dispensationalists now are not classic Dispensationalists.
Lots of folks use 'dispy' and to me that sounds like some icky kids cerealThank you ...I figured the first was dispensational, but never heard of the DF ....then again I don't pay much attention to tags or labels.
Glad you agreeTrue enough but they never were monolithic and Scofield still has a great deal of influence.
Today Christ is in session where He will remain , as the Spirit ministers on earth, until the last enemy is put away through resurrection of the body.If the final dispensationalism is not God's plan then what is His plan for creation, man's day, church/bible age, eternal salvation?
So far as I know most still hold to the 'parenthetical church age' after all with out that there is no any moment rapture and with out that there is no $There are not many prominent "classic" Dispensationalists around, so it's not really worth the discussion.
Most Dispensationalists now are not classic Dispensationalists.
Oh yes, that is a common agreement among them. But you said they believe that "the Dispensation of Law returns" after the church age closes. I'm confident they do not believe that because Dispensationalists affirm that the Law has been fulfilled.So far as I know most still hold to the 'parenthetical church age'
Temple rites and worship require regulation, priests and definitions and enforcements of true sacrifices. And from the classics Chafer called the Millennium a return to Judaism. This was never invalidated by Pentecost or Walvoord.Oh yes, that is a common agreement among them. But you said they believe that "the Dispensation of Law returns" after the church age closes. I'm confident they do not believe that because Dispensationalists affirm that the Law has been fulfilled.
Why do you say they believe the Dispensation of Law will return?
4 things:from the classics Chafer called the Millennium a return to Judaism. This was never invalidated by Pentecost or Walvoord.