it's simple, if everyone breaks the law, everyone must be stonedSorry - you've lost me on that point.
it's simple, if everyone breaks the law, everyone must be stonedSorry - you've lost me on that point.
it's simple, if everyone breaks the law, everyone must be stoned
it's simple, if everyone breaks the law, everyone must be stoned
Jesus said, "Let him that is without sin throw the first stone." Well, seeing that He is the only one without sin, was Jesus essentially saying, 'leave all judgment to Me"? And when He said to the woman, "...neither do I condemn thee," was He suggesting His judgment the only one that counts as valid? When He asks, 'where are your accusers, does anyone condemn you?' speaking exclusively of accusers and she answered, 'no one' and His reply, "neither do I..." suggests His exclusion from "anyone," considering He is not just "anyone."...
So, essentially this is a lesson in leaving God's judgment to Him alone, we are not sufficiently skilled nor even capable of picking up that sword, let alone wielding it.
I'd rather get stoned by beer or whiskey than by rocks."Well, they'll stone you when you're trying to be so good.
They'll stone you just like they said they would.
They'll stone you when you're trying to go home,
Then they'll stone you when you're there all alone.
But I would not feel so all alone,
Everybody must get stoned."
He will just sit under a large rock and wait for an earthquakeWho's stone the last person alive on Earth?
At least if he's the last we will at least know his sin wasn't adultery.Who's stone the last person alive on Earth?
At least if he's the last we will at least know his sin wasn't adultery.
Ultimately, all judgement comes from God, but before His system reaches its fulfilment, He has set up a system of temporary judgement - involving execution of adulteresses. I don't know, but maybe there were other factors in this scenario:- eg - Jesus being on Earth, preparing the way for the next stage, the restraints of Roman law, as has been suggested.
Jesus said that He did not come to change the law. He sais I will not change one dot or tittle of the law. The law He was talking about were the 10 commandments. He did however come to do away with the Sacrificial law. The men that brought the woman to Jesus were just as guilty as she was. We do not know what Jesus wrote on the ground with the stick but I am sure it was not just a drawing of some sort. If I had to make an educated guess it was a list of sins that included her. The men all left in shame bur the woman stayed; What did Jesus ask her? Where are your accusers? She replied I do not know. Jesus told her He did not accuse her either but to go and sin no more. We do not serve a harsh task master but a Loving and forgiving God. Do not take that loving kindness as a sing of weakness; God said “Vengeance is mine” but He also wishes non to parish.I've considered this event. It seems the accusers were obeying the Mosaic Law when bringing the woman to justice. Why did Jesus not fulfil this commandment? Was it because His presence on Earth was issuing in a new legal era?
Or something else?
It can't be...he's the only one left. There is noone to sin with.At least if he wasn't the adulterer.
because they were not obeying the Mosaic law. They only brought the woman who they said was caught in the VERY ACT of adultery.I've considered this event. It seems the accusers were obeying the Mosaic Law when bringing the woman to justice. Why did Jesus not fulfil this commandment? Was it because His presence on Earth was issuing in a new legal era?
Or something else?
it is not just the women it takes twoI don't understand. As I understand it, the Law taught that if a woman were caught in adultery by 2 or more witnesses, she was to be put to death. I don't see how "mercy" played a part in this.
JJ used the word hypocrites in describing those that brought the woman to Jesus, and I agree this is an accurate nomenclature of these characters, going by the letter of the law rather than the spirit. So, when you ask, where was the man in all this, they'll say, there is no scripture concerning the man's judgment, because they can't follow the spirit to conclude the man's sentence, by God's standards, is also death. Maybe not by stoning but, ultimately, by death nonetheless, for the wages of sin is death.it is not just the women it takes two
I've considered this event. It seems the accusers were obeying the Mosaic Law when bringing the woman to justice. Why did Jesus not fulfil this commandment? Was it because His presence on Earth was issuing in a new legal era?
Or something else?
I've considered this event. It seems the accusers were obeying the Mosaic Law when bringing the woman to justice. Why did Jesus not fulfil this commandment? Was it because His presence on Earth was issuing in a new legal era?
Or something else?