another thing I noticed on CC is that people seem to think anything published online is propaganda lol
well no, sometimes its really just people thinking for themselves.
It's not like she is just some random chick with a blog, sitting there blogging random thoughts of hers. She's a businessperson with reasonable success, who aside from her political leanings seems beautiful and capable of intelligent thought; I'm sure she has a substantial audience and influence. It's just that way she thinks for herself is such a perfect echo of American liberal propaganda, it's virtually indistinguishable; and that's why I said
it "looks like" standard leftist propaganda.
-
Calls for national outrage over a
survey, it seems before any actual investigations take place.
-Has a father, and even married a man who went to a single-sex school... but dismisses that because
"the world has changed"... and while yes, some things change; human nature does not, and God does not.
-Uses the
United States as a good example, when our
education system is widely regarded as a failure: there remains a widespread call for education reform among Christians and non-Christians.
-Cites a scholar who defiles our land in NY with ideas of
"global citizenship".
-Apparently values
"ethnic and gender diversity" over actual educational opportunities. (viewing school as a social opportunity rather than accomplishing it's actual purpose).
-Asserts that her children "must see both male and female peers in leadership roles". Leadership appointed to fill a "check in the box" or satisfy
"diversity requirements" are a disaster and a disgrace to everyone. I was never "in awe" of a single female student in school; yet in my professional life I have served under the authority of several women, some good, some bad, some terrible, and one
exceptionally good- without prejudice.
-Appeals to
supposed popularity. "Everyone else is doing it" on it's own is not a valid reason to do something; even if it were true that there was this homogenous international community that where everyone acts in one accord.
but you do thave any insight of your own experience so your post adds nothing to the discussion sorry ...next.
You said...
dont be confused, just do your research...
And indeed, that's what I did and do.
If you insist on experiences, I can say that in my coed shop class in high school, I was the envy of my classmates because the young lady at the desk in front of me would always be leaning forward such that her thong and cheeks were half way out of her jeans... If they were distracted
from across the room, I hate to think how badly they'd be distracted in my seat right behind her. It was only a minor distraction to me because I have low testosterone if I don't go to the gym, and I basically have the focus of a high-functioning autistic person... but being distracted from learning and following safety precautions in shop class is definitely dangerous; considering someone did get cut open pretty good in that class.
I cant say whether self imposed purdah is a good or bad thing but seems when it comes to adolescence single sex education turns a blind eye to healthy interactions between opposite sexes. Just keep them apart! They will figure it out! hmmm
Liberal educators speak as if their public institutions are the only place where social interaction is possible...
that is obviously not the case. They exaggerate their role in society to the extent that it's an insult to the entire human race. There is not some "mystery" of interaction with the opposite sex... either you follow the golden rule, or you don't; and if you don't it doesn't matter whether or not your academic institution was coed or single-sex.
When you look at "experiences" or case studies of things that have gone wrong at either type of institution, they are usually not things that are necessarily specific to that type of institution. Either type of school can create a toxic environment for it's students. The only real
inherent difference between the two is that in coed institutions there are more opportunities for sexual impulses to overwhelm and become a distraction to young people that have not yet developed stronger senses to discern their impulses, and who regularly overestimate their own willpower and self-control. The coed-school's do not "teach self-control" either; they deal with this by making it the student's problem... but if the students aren't able to resolve this, then they will make it become society's problem later on when they develop low-self esteem, become sociopaths, and start murdering people.
