It’s not up to personal interpretationIt's in plain language to me.
It’s not up to personal interpretationIt's in plain language to me.
Meditating on Scriptures is what all the religious men and women do. Just because I am a lay person, it doesn't mean I can't do the same. It is in plain language. Thanks for your concern, though. It's good to not go wild with the Scriptures as some people do. This just dawned on me some years ago. I thought I would share it here to see what everyone else thinks. I'm not surprised that some don't believe it's true.It’s not up to personal interpretation
Isn't Methuselah suppose to be immortal? I think that's what I read.In John 21.22, Jesus says that John would remain alive until He returns. So, where is John now? Where has he been? Did Jesus keep anyone else alive? John is the oldest living person if it's just him, at over 2000 years old. So, where is he? Wouldn't he be in the news? Wouldn't he be out preaching and healing people and working wonders and miracles?
I think he is either one of two things: 1. being held captive somewhere. or 2. in hiding somewhere. Those are the only explanations I can come up with for not knowing his whereabouts.
Except nowhere is it said that John will not, or would not, die. YouIt is in plain language
He was Noah’s grandfather, and he wasn’t listed on the Ark’s passenger list.Isn't Methuselah suppose to be immortal? I think that's what I read.
Methuselah wasn't worthy of salvation from the flood?He was Noah’s grandfather, and he wasn’t listed on the Ark’s passenger list.
John will die, but not until Jesus comes again.Except nowhere is it said that John will not, or would not, die. You
read that in and then act as if that is what Jesus said, when He did
not, and/or meant, the latter of which is pure speculation on your part.
Meditating on Scriptures is what all the religious men and women do. Just because I am a lay person, it doesn't mean I can't do the same. It is in plain language. Thanks for your concern, though. It's good to not go wild with the Scriptures as some people do. This just dawned on me some years ago. I thought I would share it here to see what everyone else thinks. I'm not surprised that some don't believe it's true.
It was Methuselah's father, Enoch, that was taken by God. Genesis 5.24 and Hebrews 11.5.Methuselah wasn't worthy of salvation from the flood?
Did not look closely at he verse following the one you quoted? It seems to say plainly the opposite to what you are inferring.Meditating on Scriptures is what all the religious men and women do. Just because I am a lay person, it doesn't mean I can't do the same. It is in plain language. Thanks for your concern, though. It's good to not go wild with the Scriptures as some people do. This just dawned on me some years ago. I thought I would share it here to see what everyone else thinks. I'm not surprised that some don't believe it's true.
True. Only eight were saved: Noah and his wife, their three sons, and their sons' wives.He was Noah’s grandfather, and he wasn’t listed on the Ark’s passenger list.
Sure, I care about what others think about this. It's okay if you don't trust me because I'm not your pastor. No, I've never heard it before. I just figured it logically that John is still out there somewhere. There was this street sign on this bus route I used to take when I volunteered at a library called Saint Johns Drive. It just got me thinking while I was riding on the bus one day.Did you really want to know what others think? I don't doubt you believe it, but it doesn't have the ring of truth to me. Just because something pops into your head, and it seems to be some kind of new revelation, that doesn't make it true. Has this ever been taught historically? Can you point to any other sources who have taught this?
Sure, I care about what others think about this. It's okay if you don't trust me because I'm not your pastor. No, I've never heard it before. I just figured it logically that John is still out there somewhere. There was this street sign on this bus route I used to take when I volunteered at a library called Saint Johns Drive. It just got me thinking while I was riding on the bus one day.
Well it's His words, not mine that are being stood up to scrutiny. I'm just the one here that realized what it means in the present day, that John has yet to die.It's not a matter of trusting or not trusting you; it's about whether what you're saying can stand up to scrutiny. Have you considered Mark 10:39? Jesus, talking to James and John, says: "So Jesus said to them, 'You will indeed drink the cup that I drink, and with the baptism I am baptized with you will be baptized;' "
Sounds like Jesus is foretelling John's death.
Well it's His words, not mine that are being stood up to scrutiny. I'm just the one here that realized what it means in the present day, that John has yet to die.
I'm just the one here that realized what it means in the present day, that John has yet to die.
He died before the flood started.Methuselah wasn't worthy of salvation from the flood?
No need to insult me. You have the right to disagree, but calling me delusional isn't right. It makes sense. Jesus said John wouldn't die until He returns. So, he's still alive now. It's nothing revolutionary, just something that you've got to pick up on if your smart.That's fine, I've seen it a million times. Someone gets an idea in their head and they think they're the only one privileged enough to see it, even when there's a mountain of evidence against them. I won't waste any more time trying to talk you out of your delusions.