again, its you who has not understood the ONE thing we are told about the restraining.
it is you who has projected on to that text what you THINK it means, what you EXPECT satan to be doing or not doing.
when you have the passage itself telling you what it says.
so, i'm just not discussing this with you any more since you can not even agree that we look ONLY at what the text actually SAYS. YOU'VE INFERRED FROM THE IMAGERY far too many things about the time frame, the actual binding, the resultant action/inaction concerning certain things etc.
this is laziness. plain and simple. and its evidence that you haven't bothered researching at all the work of ANY reputable scholars on amillennialism (because its easier to accuse me of whatever you like)...but if you find yourself face to face with seasoned men of God throughout the ages who have read this Book as amillennialist...then what?
i suggest that you look to men like Dr. Kim Riddlebarger who came out of dispensational theology.
send him an email making these sloppy allegations of a prideful and callous heart and see what you get in return for your own lack of scholarship.
though if you were a little more respectful he would certainly reply accordingly (i know he does answer emails).
here's his contact info:
Riddleblog - Contact Me
don't ask me any more questions about the Church's Historical Amillennial view.
your post is insulting and condescending and quite embarrassing for you, since Amillennialism is the only true eschatological position possible.