True, there must be a reason. It’s kind of pathetic.Don't waste your energy. He's a troll that gets banned and re-registers again with the same trolling technique.
True, there must be a reason. It’s kind of pathetic.Don't waste your energy. He's a troll that gets banned and re-registers again with the same trolling technique.
And? You don't grammar too good. What's your excuse?
Wait, what? You left off the Jack, and reminded me of Jack. Remember Jack? .If you stopped being a donkey for a little while
When you have answered my question, and asked yours, both with correct grammar, I'll be happy to answer.What your excuse for following a creator who endorses beating people with a weapon as they are your property.
I believe the adventures of Jack predated my involvement on this site.Wait, what? You left off the Jack, and reminded me of Jack. Remember Jack? .![]()
Simple answer is yes, under some instances, during OT times. The slavery we know of today however such as stealing and selling people, human trafficking, etc. was in fact outlawed in the Bible ("anyone who kidnaps someone is to be put to death, whether the victim has been sold or is still in the kidnapper’s possession." - Exodus 21:16). Basically you cannot enslave a kidnapped person or their descendants, and basically all slaves are kidnapped at some point ( including the slaves from Africa during the slave trade days).
Physical punishment was considered the appropriate response for acts of disobedience and rebellion. Are you familiar with "spare the rod and spoil the child? Same difference. Now the rod has been spared and we are overrun with entitled snowflake lazy brats.What your excuse for following a creator who endorses beating people with a weapon as they are your property.
You actually joined before I did .I believe the adventures of Jack predated my involvement on this site.
God making regulations to reduce/prevent abuse does not necessarily mean He approves of men's practices.So you follow the OT creator who endorses owning other humans as property.
When you have answered my question, and asked yours, both with correct grammar, I'll be happy to answer.![]()
The troll makes incorrect and unwarranted assumptions.Is more concerned with typo's. Than slavery.
God has always desired people to treat each other better. Let's talk about the flood. More specifically, the reason for it:Is more concerned with typo's. Than slavery.
God making regulations to reduce/prevent abuse does not necessarily mean He approves of men's practices.
So you present a logical fallacy.
Exactly. Oh! Laws were given. Do you think people followed them??? All the time? 100% perfectly?Not preventing anything. Literally giving instructions who you can buy, who you can beat, who inherits the slave.
You didn't say the creator you believe in never endorsed slavery. You admitted he did. So you do believe in a creator who endorsed slavery.
Just like the terms and conditions you agreed to when you signed up do not prevent you from immediately breaking them.Not preventing anything.
Exactly. Oh! Laws were given. Do you think people followed them??? All the time? 100% perfectly?
So now you change your point.. The other responses you said that God endorses slavery PRESENT TENSE but now you have improved in comprehension one step.. to God endorsed slavery PAST TENSE.. Very good,, you have risen in my estimation ..
Now lets see if you can progress even more..
Go back and read my answers and you will see i said it was for a certain Time and for a certain people... The Hebrew people who where linked to Him by the Old Covenant and it was limited to the heathen nations living around them.. See so much detail in my responses.. Lets see if your understanding can become even more detailed and thus accurate..
And? Why are you bleating about slavery? If you don't like what God said to the Israelites ~3300 years ago, don't follow Him. Nobody's forcing you.So nothing was prevented. Prevention would be - do not own people as property. But it literally says the opposite.