"I have come to bring a sword" is not a covenant. If you would drop the concept (and word) 'covenant', we can have a conversation. Otherwise, you're off in left field.The covenant of the sword
"I have come to bring a sword" is not a covenant. If you would drop the concept (and word) 'covenant', we can have a conversation. Otherwise, you're off in left field.The covenant of the sword
you have it back to front,"I have come to bring a sword" is not a covenant. If you would drop the concept (and word) 'covenant', we can have a conversation. Otherwise, you're off in left field.
Don't bother with your dismissive comments... especially when they don't relate to my post at all.you have it back to front,
The Bible doesn't say that. Simeon says specifically to Mary, "A sword will pierce your own soul." He does not say it to everyone. Given that most of the rest of your post is based on this erroneous basis, it's not worth addressing.all believers will have a sword that Pearce's there soul,
It doesn't mean anything of the sort.which then means they are under a new covenant.
That's both unrelated and silly.How much more of a contract or a will be, when a sword penetrates your soul can this be.
Your comment is asinine, inappropriate, and erroneous.Obviously you have missed the covenant that Christians are under![]()
You think that just because someone doesn't always love their enemy or their neighbour (in your opinion) that they aren't Christian? How dumb can you be and still breathe?Also Jesus is the great redeemer of souls.
But under this covenant there is requirements.
One of them is to love thy enemy and love thy neighbour.
So if your not doing that then your under a different redemptive plan.
Don't bother with your dismissive comments... especially when they don't relate to my post at all.
The Bible doesn't say that. Simeon says specifically to Mary, "A sword will pierce your own soul." He does not say it to everyone. Given that most of the rest of your post is based on this erroneous basis, it's not worth addressing.
It doesn't mean anything of the sort.
That's both unrelated and silly.
Your comment is asinine, inappropriate, and erroneous.
and again we see the sword that divides brothers,You think that just because someone doesn't always love their enemy or their neighbour (in your opinion) that they aren't Christian? How dumb can you be and still breathe?
More asinine silliness. It's not the truth of God that is dividing here; it's your stubbornness in asserting what it does not say.and again we see the sword that divides brothers,
And so the word of God does not lie![]()
yes more sowing discordMore asinine silliness. It's not the truth of God that is dividing here; it's your stubbornness in asserting what it does not say.
So you admit it? Well, that's a start.yes more sowing discord![]()
thanks for your opinion and your viewI was kind with you in the beginning as I am militant minded. But you lost me real quick. Can't hang with you. And just because someone is ordained or a "Senior Pastor" doesn't make them right. I had a guy preaching once that you could name your own angel and wanted everyone to get up and give their personal angel a hug. Shadowy forms supposedly helped him write his books and would type it out for him. And we all had 5 angels protecting us at all times. Not 3, 4 or 6 but 5. Many associate pastors in the congregation eagerly stood up to hug and name their angels.
Red Flag, Red Flag....Everything in me was screaming demonic. And this guy had been ordained by multiple well known denominations.
do you call this a discussionSo you admit it? Well, that's a start.
Y
You did not answer Nehemiah 6's question to you in his post #33.
What bible translation did you get your version of Luke 2:35 from ?
Every bible verse I quote from is the kjv.
"
Not exactly. I call it you trying to make doctrine out of thin air and me telling you you’re out to lunch.do you call this a discussion
do you call this a discussionNot exactly. I call it you trying to make doctrine out of thin air and me telling you you’re out to lunch.