Hello @Eli1, I know that both the RCC and the EOC continually claim to be "God's one, true church", but I believe that the EOC may be somewhat closer to being correct about that because they seem to hold far more closely to their ancient "traditions" than the RCC does (which claims their Magisterium's new teachings, understandings or "living traditions" are actually apostolic, that they have, therefore 1. always existed, but 2. were never fully understood until recently ... or, when that doesn't work, simply claim the leading of the Holy Spirit instead, even when such a "leading" sinks and buries His written teachings in the word of God ).
I also believe (as you seem to be saying above too) that the EOC has a far better balance between their traditions and the Bible (interestingly, I've heard a number of detailed Biblical "sermons" from the EOC, while the RCC seems content to stick with its 10-minute weekly "homilies" instead .. IOW, the Bible seems to be much more of a focus for the EOC).
Just to be clear, I don't believe that either one of these two, visible churches is the "one, true church", of course!
God bless you!!
~Deuteronomy (David)
p.s. - I find it interesting that the Jews, even today, hold to both a written AND an oral Torah that they believe were both delivered to Moses by God at the same time. Of course, we NEVER see that teaching in the Bible from the Lord (about the Jews' oral traditions, that is). Rather, He points out many of the falsehoods of their oral teachings while always pointing to the written OT as authoritative. Perhaps it would behoove the RCC and the EOC to consider that fact (though I'm certain that they, sadly, never will
).