Are there really true atheists?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

MaryM

Well-known member
Nov 25, 2022
513
319
63
#1
I am reading a book about Billy Graham, the great evangelist.
He said he had never met anyone who he thought was a real atheist.
That to me is an interesting point and I wonder if he was right?
 

Seeker47

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2018
1,137
980
113
#2
For what it's worth, I absolutely agree. There are none.

The term "Atheist" is commonly used today to describe someone who rejects the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The term actually means someone who worships no god at all. But this is an impossibility.

Worshiping something was built into our very nature at creation, we cannot escape. We worship God or we worship something He created while rejecting Him. Money, power and fame are the most common substitutions but in truth these are just concealed forms of self-worship.

We worship our creator or we worship ourselves. That is our only options.
 

Eli1

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2022
4,995
2,161
113
46
#3
I am reading a book about Billy Graham, the great evangelist.
He said he had never met anyone who he thought was a real atheist.
That to me is an interesting point and I wonder if he was right?
As seeker said, i don't think the term 'atheist' according to the dictionary (which is another hilarious subject onto itself) exists.

Because if you say "i don't believe in God" it means that you yourself are into a belief system and if you say
"i lack belief in God" that's an impossibility unless you've had a brain injury and you're in a comatose state where you lack awareness that you even exist.
 
Nov 14, 2024
526
315
63
#4
I am reading a book about Billy Graham, the great evangelist.
He said he had never met anyone who he thought was a real atheist.
That to me is an interesting point and I wonder if he was right?
One portion of scripture which might shed some light on this is the following.

Rom 1:18
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Rom 1:19
Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
Rom 1:20
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Rom 1:21
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Rom 1:22
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
Rom 1:23
And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Rom 1:24
Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
Rom 1:25
Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Rom 1:26
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
Rom 1:27
And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Rom 1:28
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
Rom 1:29
Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
Rom 1:30
Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
Rom 1:31
Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
Rom 1:32
Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Here, we read of those who hold (as in hold down or suppress) the truth in unrighteousness, those who that which may be known of God has been manifest to because God has shown it unto them, those who are without excuse because the invisible things of God from the creation of the world have been clearly seen and understood by them; even his eternal power and Godhead, those who once knew God, yet glorified him not as God, but became vain in their imaginations (which indicates a change from when they were not given to such vanity), as their foolish hearts became darkened (which indicates that they once had light), and as they became fools (which indicates that they were once wise), those who changed the glory of the incorruptible God into corruptible images (which indicates that they once understood God's incorruptibleness), those who changed the truth of God into a lie (which indicates that they once knew the truth), those who did not like to retain God in their knowledge (which indicates that they once had a knowledge of God), and those who know the judgment of God, yet not only sin against God themselves, but also take pleasure in others who similarly sin against him.

To me, it does not sound like any of the above mentioned were ever truly atheists, and it is based upon this portion of scripture that many, including myself, have said, in a deliberate play on words, that "God does not believe in atheists." Also, God's wrath is revealed against such people, and I personally do not believe that God's wrath would be aimed at anybody who is truly ignorant of his existence.
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,885
4,536
113
#5
Of course, there are no real atheists. Why? Logically that would imply that to believe that God doesn't exist is to know that He doesn't.

How could you know if God doesn't exist by the definition of an eternal, spaceless, immaterial, and all-knowledgeable being?

You would equally have to of that same definition to reach the supernatural realm to say objectively that God doesn't exist.

The only honest stance one can take is at most agnostic or the idea that they do not know if God exists or if He does which God?

The only honest approach would be to debate whether has God made Himself known and whether has He made Himself evident to be the one true God. That is as far as a nonbeliever can logically go.
 

Karlon

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2023
2,695
1,233
113
#6
For what it's worth, I absolutely agree. There are none.

The term "Atheist" is commonly used today to describe someone who rejects the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The term actually means someone who worships no god at all. But this is an impossibility.

Worshiping something was built into our very nature at creation, we cannot escape. We worship God or we worship something He created while rejecting Him. Money, power and fame are the most common substitutions but in truth these are just concealed forms of self-worship.

We worship our creator or we worship ourselves. That is our only options.
an impossibility? no, not correct. there are lot's of people just around here who don't worship any god at all. why do you think someone HAS TO worship a god? what was built in our very nature is in Hebrews 8:10- "....... I WILL PUT MY LAWS INTO THEIR MINDS......" people worship the devil & God didn't create him. the devil, with his free will, chose to act against God.
 
Nov 14, 2024
526
315
63
#7
Of course, there are no real atheists. Why? Logically that would imply that to believe that God doesn't exist is to know that He doesn't.

How could you know if God doesn't exist by the definition of an eternal, spaceless, immaterial, and all-knowledgeable being?

You would equally have to of that same definition to reach the supernatural realm to say objectively that God doesn't exist.

The only honest stance one can take is at most agnostic or the idea that they do not know if God exists or if He does which God?

The only honest approach would be to debate whether has God made Himself known and whether has He made Himself evident to be the one true God. That is as far as a nonbeliever can logically go.
If somebody gives me even the slightest impression that they know that God does not exist, then I respond in this manner.

Oh, you're omniscient?

What is my middle name?

End of conversation.
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
27,672
9,608
113
#8
Of course, there are no real atheists. Why? Logically that would imply that to believe that God doesn't exist is to know that He doesn't.

How could you know if God doesn't exist by the definition of an eternal, spaceless, immaterial, and all-knowledgeable being?

You would equally have to of that same definition to reach the supernatural realm to say objectively that God doesn't exist.

The only honest stance one can take is at most agnostic or the idea that they do not know if God exists or if He does which God?

The only honest approach would be to debate whether has God made Himself known and whether has He made Himself evident to be the one true God. That is as far as a nonbeliever can logically go.
If I were an atheist I would counter that with Russell's teapot. Mind you, I am not an atheist. But I think he had a good point concerning the way a lot of Christians argue.

Russell said:
Many orthodox people speak as though it were the business of sceptics to disprove received dogmas rather than of dogmatists to prove them. This is, of course, a mistake. If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.
 

Eli1

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2022
4,995
2,161
113
46
#9
I can respond to Russell.

Dear Russell, i also don't take any flat earth arguments seriously, which is why everything begins with "I Believe".
Depending on the degree of reasons or 'good' guesses, Faith is also more logical, as opposed to believing your imagination of tea pots in our solar system, which would make you a flat earther in your logical reasoning.

I Believe in God because there is good reason to.
Because:
1. The Universe exists.
2. The fine-tuning argument exists.
3. Miracles exist.
4. Jesus Christ was here.

Take care Russell and let's grab tea some day with high caffeine content.
 

daisyseesthesun

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2024
761
430
63
#10
I am reading a book about Billy Graham, the great evangelist.
He said he had never met anyone who he thought was a real atheist.
That to me is an interesting point and I wonder if he was right?
No atheists in foxholes, but I had a classmate who said, "Even if he did exist, I wouldn't believe in him", as in Luke 16:28, there are such people. So, do I believe there are real atheists? No. I believe we all know God there. Everyone knows who Jesus christ is in the Western world. That is why the spiritual moment is vast. They believe but don't want to follow or, as they say, they are too scared of the "rules" But on the other side, I was listening to a testimony recently where a woman who called herself a witch and her dog died and she could get no comfort after its death . The only thing that gave her comfort was reading the Bible. God opened her heart, and she became a Christian, which proves that anyone can be saved.
 

daisyseesthesun

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2024
761
430
63
#11
Russell , Scientists still can't explain how a universe that initially had nothing in it somehow suddenly produced material. George Washington Carver said, "When I was young, I said to God, 'God, tell me the mystery of the universe.' But God answered, 'That knowledge is for me alone.' So I said, 'God, tell me the mystery of the peanut.' Then God said, 'Well, George, that's more nearly your size.' And he told me."
Shroud studies
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,885
4,536
113
#12
If I were an atheist I would counter that with Russell's teapot. Mind you, I am not an atheist. But I think he had a good point concerning the way a lot of Christians argue.
Very true. Which is why you always look towards evidence no matter how circumstantial it may seem.

Could there be a tea pot between Earth and Mars? It's plausible to assume that Earth trash could escape the gravitational pull due to space exploration but because we have only explored within Earth's gravitational pull, I doubt it.

I doubt is as far as I can go because of the plausibility.

Same reasoning for God except the plausibility is much higher due to the evidence. Once a person moves from plausible to belief then it becomes personal. Plausible becomes known.

Same with dragons. I doubt they exist but can not fully rule them out despite there being no fossils, ancient art and stories tell us of ancient flying fire-breathing dragons. We have relatively limited amount of fossils for dinosaurs but yet it proves ancient beasts existed.
 

Seeker47

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2018
1,137
980
113
#14
Of course, there are no real atheists. Why? Logically that would imply that to believe that God doesn't exist is to know that He doesn't.

How could you know if God doesn't exist by the definition of an eternal, spaceless, immaterial, and all-knowledgeable being?

You would equally have to of that same definition to reach the supernatural realm to say objectively that God doesn't exist.

The only honest stance one can take is at most agnostic or the idea that they do not know if God exists or if He does which God?

The only honest approach would be to debate whether has God made Himself known and whether has He made Himself evident to be the one true God. That is as far as a nonbeliever can logically go.
Great response, I have not thought about it in that way. To say God does not exist is itself an act of faith. An act of faith must have an object.
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
27,672
9,608
113
#15

Psalm 14:1-3; Job 15:16
How does a cartoon image look so much like she is wearing a LOT of makeup? Why would a cartoon girl even need to wear makeup?
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,739
6,904
113
#16
I am reading a book about Billy Graham, the great evangelist.
He said he had never met anyone who he thought was a real atheist.
That to me is an interesting point and I wonder if he was right?
IMO, there are no "true" atheists. Simply because everyone believes in some thing or person. A "true" atheist would not place any belief/value in any thing or person.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,096
30,223
113
#17
How does a cartoon image look so much like she is wearing a LOT of makeup? Why would a cartoon girl even need to wear makeup?
I can understand with your tendency to choose egg-head stick men to represent people you would see this figure as
having on a lot of make-up. Perhaps you are simply unaware of the limitations inherent in my methods and choices.
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
27,672
9,608
113
#18
I can understand with your tendency to choose egg-head stick men to represent people you would see this figure as
having on a lot of make-up. Perhaps you are simply unaware of the limitations inherent in my methods and choices.
Not my choice. Randall Monroe chose that.


xkcd.com


He just has a lot of good things to say, that just happen to fit a lot of situations that come up in these threads.
 

blueluna5

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2018
666
399
63
#19
I think it's interesting.

"I am (God's name) an atheist (meaning no God)."

You shared God before your view of not believing him. Language is spiritual.