Fewer abortions*
I had to laugh. I saw a woman on a video saw that we have finally driven liberal women to become more responsible and conservative.
Fewer abortions*
I had to laugh. I saw a woman on a video saw that we have finally driven liberal women to become more responsible and conservative.
That would be the optimistic outlook. For most, I fear we are merely making it less convenient for them to kill their unborn children. I certainly don't want to make it easier though. I am hopeful it will yield to people, men and women, being more responsible in their decision-making.
I think we have made things too easy. Divorce, abortion, transgender, not that I'm putting divorce on that level. It's just that if these things were harder to do, it might make people stop and consider before they make these choices and life changing decisions.
I think we have made things too easy. Divorce, abortion, transgender, not that I'm putting divorce on that level. It's just that if these things were harder to do, it might make people stop and consider before they make these choices and life changing decisions.
Fascist much?I think we have made things too easy. Divorce, abortion, transgender, not that I'm putting divorce on that level. It's just that if these things were harder to do, it might make people stop and consider before they make these choices and life changing decisions.
Fascist much?
There are many reasons why people might decided to end a marriage. Sometimes issues are just irreconcilable.
My brother and I were actually relieved when my parents finally divorced because we finally had peace.
I remember my dad breaking my mother's nose over remote control. But, what you propose would make women be trapped in these relationships
You won't find any constitutional basis for putting any restrictions on divorce. It's a contract between two people in the state that can be revoked if both parties agree.Dude, as usual you flare without the slightest thought to what is being said. You've known me here for a long time. How you came up with this conclusion is beyond me.
You won't find any constitutional basis for putting any restrictions on divorce. It's a contract between two people in the state that can be revoked if both parties agree.
What you are proposing is a slippery slope that could trap women into abusive relationships or even men for that matter
I think we have made things too easy. Divorce, abortion, transgender, not that I'm putting divorce on that level. It's just that if these things were harder to do, it might make people stop and consider before they make these choices and life changing decisions.
obviouslyJust because a woman doesn't scream doesnt mean she wasn't raped. There is date rape, sex with those who cannot consent, and injury or death threats for example. It is reasonable to assume that men would want the victim to be quiet. He doesn't want to be found.
I assume your talking about some type of trickery like alcohol to make someone more likely to agree, or drugs or hypnotism, or statutory or the like since rape by definition isn't consented to?If a woman agrees to be raped, it can still be rape because it was unwanted. For guys who do not understand this, it may make more sense if you imagine yourself dealing with a guy rapist.
Just because a woman doesn't scream doesnt mean she wasn't raped. There is date rape, sex with those who cannot consent, and injury or death threats for example. It is reasonable to assume that men would want the victim to be quiet. He doesn't want to be found. If a woman agrees to be raped, it can still be rape because it was unwanted. For guys who do not understand this, it may make more sense if you imagine yourself dealing with a guy rapist.
Sorry, where did the topic of rape come up? I didn't see it, even when I read back to the first page.
There was discussion above on punishment based on whether or not a woman screams.
I don't know of any man that would ever "agree to being raped" by another man. It's still gay, even if your life is at stake.If a woman agrees to be raped, it can still be rape because it was unwanted. For guys who do not understand this, it may make more sense if you imagine yourself dealing with a guy rapist.
I don't know of any man that would ever "agree to being raped" by another man. It's still gay, even if your life is at stake.
That's the thing, though... we wouldn't sympathize with that, because it's not something we'd do whether our lives were in danger, or not. Most men respond to threats, coercion, blackmail etc. with overt hostility; no married man, especially a Christian man is going to be like "okay, rape me"... not gonna happen.I just gave that example so men can empathize more with women who have gone through that
Most men respond to threats, coercion, blackmail etc. with overt hostility; no married man, especially a Christian man is going to be like "okay, rape me"... not gonna happen.