Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,978
397
83
Incorrect Rufus, no one has a perfect free will.

Surely you noticed how many times the apostles failed at the simplest of things.

Everyone is given over to disobedience and that includes the church through history.

Not one person is ever righteous and not even close.
Really? You mean man's "free" will is restricted? Better watch your step, buddy, lest you slip slide into the biblical doctrine Total Depravity.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,041
6,863
113
62
So all their offspring were spiritual?

So when did God create the reprobate offspring and destroy them at Mt Sinai?
I have no idea. Most probably not. And as far as I know, God creates life in the womb.

Honestly, I don't understand your point, unless you simply are trying not to answer my question.
 
Nov 14, 2024
526
315
63
Is the ability to choose the same as freewill?
Lol. Why are you answering my questions with questions? I don't mean for this to sound rude or accusatory, but it almost seems as if you are hesitant to give your own definition of free will because you think that it will not hold up under scrutiny. I could be totally wrong, and I truly mean you no offense, but I am just trying to figure out why you will not answer a simple question.

To answer your question, it seems to me that free will, in the context of this thread, is our God-given ability to freely choose whether or not we will receive God's gracious offer of salvation through Jesus Christ.

I am walking out the door now, so if you have any other questions, or if you are willing to give me your definition of free will, then it will be a bit before I can answer them or consider it.
 
Oct 19, 2024
1,740
441
83
No, I do not believe that God's grace unto salvation is universal. I believe, given that it was God who brought salvation
to fruition through Jesus Christ, it was His prerogative to dispense it to whomever He so chose to, for whatever reason He chose, to include having no reason for His choice at all, other than it was His choice, as no one deserves it.
Were it otherwise, then salvation would become dependent upon man's works, not God's, and mean we
are under law - the full and complete law of works - which law no man can satisfy.
Okay, here is my understanding of our disagreement:

1. We agree that salvation is not universal, but I believe 1TM 2:3-4, DT 30:19, etal indicate that God wants it to be or offers grace to all people, whereas you provide no Scripture to support belief that God hates the non-elect part of humanity and condemns them to hell with no chance to be saved.

2. We agree that it is God's prerogative to dispense grace/salvation to whomever He so chooses to, but we disagree about "for whatever reason or no reason", as though His choice/election can be motivated by hatred or else a blind throw of the darts. I believe the reason must be love, because Jesus said we should love our enemies and be perfect like God (MT 5:44&48). You ascribe irrationality and hatred to God for no good/biblical reason.

3. We agree that no one deserves or can earn grace/salvation by works or obeying moral law, but we disagree about whether faith is a meritorious work rather than merely one's will accepting God's work. My view is supported by EPH 2:8-10 and every other NT reference to faith/belief, because it harmonizes with Scripture teaching that God is all-loving, whereas your view interprets a few of those references as indicating God determines whether or not everyone repents or not, which makes God blamable for lack of repentance/faith.

I wouldn't want to show up at the pearly gates holding that low opinion of God!
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,847
639
113
not everyone accepts it though and we see the result also for them in that verse which isnt a pleasant thought. Since all mankind is condemned to die eventually , God has offered all mankind mercy and grace to be saved on the condition of belief of what the lord Jesus has done for us in the shedding of his precious life on the cross at Calvary and also what he has said to us on the gospel regarding salvation.
Belief comes from salvation; it does not lead to salvation - it is of the fruit of the Spirit upon becoming
born again - a result of being saved - it does not occur in the reverse. Our acceptance of it has no bearing upon receiving it.
Jesus alone wears the title of Savior. As Savior, everything pertaining to salvation had to be achieved by Him on our behalf -
eliminating the requirement of choice on our part, were it otherwise, He could not be the Savior. That is what makes salvation by grace - there is simply no way around it.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,978
397
83
You know what I really hate about THIS argument? This specific argument on CC between the people here having it? The fact that it's possible to have this disagreement and the perspective we look at it from, and still be brothers and sisters. We can even talk about this together in a way that glorifies the one and only TRUE God and His Son Jesus, the ONLY way ANYONE gets To God. We really can be saved in truth and see this different ways.

That's just not at all what's going on here, and it's sadly not even possible when half the conversation is on a Holy mission to destroy the other without ever even knowing what they believe. When that half refuses to listen or consider anything the other says, and ALL they do is attack this list of "bad beliefs" they carry around and tell themselves and others that the others believe this and are therefore wrong because-goes on to destroy the list of "bad beliefs", they just provided, that no one has ever said they believe in the conversation. Then high five each other for teaching the other group how wrong they are for the "bad beliefs" that they say you have. That you clearly tell them you don't, but they don't care what you have to say about it.

This is completely impossible to handle at all. You can't convince people like this. There does NOT AT ALL have to be this unbridgeable chasm between these two different ways of seeing the same thing that they insist there is, but there will never be an understanding when half the conversation completely ignores what you say and paints every one of your beliefs with lies. Bottom line.
Straw men or red herrings are the only "defenses" they have. They want to remain willfully ignorant! Take CV5, for example, who has tried at various times to make Adam into a spiritual superhero because he supposedly sinned on behalf of Eve who he loved dearly. What a load of horse manure! Adam loved her so much that he threw her under the bus when Adam questioned him. :rolleyes: Moreover, CV5 doesn't bother to make the argument how much Adam loved God when he sinned! I guess all that really matters in his mind is that Adam allegedly loved someone. :rolleyes: Pathetic!

I say Adam loved himself and his spiritual father since he was doing the Serpent's will.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,041
6,863
113
62
Lol. Why are you answering my questions with questions? I don't mean for this to sound rude or accusatory, but it almost seems as if you are hesitant to give your own definition of free will because you think that it will not hold up under scrutiny. I could be totally wrong, and I truly mean you no offense, but I am just trying to figure out why you will not answer a simple question.

To answer your question, it seems to me that free will, in the context of this thread, is our God-given ability to freely choose whether or not we will receive God's gracious offer of salvation through Jesus Christ.

I am walking out the door now, so if you have any other questions, or if you are willing to give me your definition of free will, then it will be a bit before I can answer them or consider it.
Your answer was what I'm trying to avoid. I'm not looking for a definition according to the thread. I'm simply trying to establish what freewill is. After doing this, we can evaluate whether and to what extent an individual possesses freewill and its application to salvation.
If one begins with the application of freewill to salvation apart from establishing what freewill is independent of it, we're more likely to agree on the definition.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,978
397
83
My conclusions regarding Calvinite-ism led to me making a prison break.
Bye bye dungeon.

Why would I go back to darkness, despair and flail and wail with the incarcerated Calvinite doom-bots?

Sorry not interested. Fake sorry.
Nah...you're still imprisoned. It's only Jesus who can set you free and you categorically reject his gospel, so that tells me that you are stuck in a very deep dungeon.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,978
397
83
Nothing makes sense on this thread.

God creates the vast majority of people so that He can cast them into the lake of fire?

They can suffer through life on this planet without hope, without God.

Then they can suffer for eternity.

I don't believe anyone would tolerate that kind of interpretation, a God without love.
But God has much love. For one thing, he LOVES justice (Ps 11:7)! So, how is God unjust by giving sinners what they deserve? You act as though sinners are worthy of God's grace, mercy and compassion.
 
Oct 19, 2024
1,740
441
83
Whether you realize it or not sis, you're trying to pit scripture with scripture.

John 10:28 is a clear and straight forward verse. We will NEVER perish. The Armins try to find/make a verse say ," Well, we can perish." So go back to the very clear verse.....We will NEVER perish. So the more ambiguous verse must mean something other than loss of salvation.

Acts 16:31. Clear and straight forward. Believe and then you shall be saved.

Same as .....commit things worthy of stripes THEN shall be beaten.
Straight-forward Scriptures sometimes seem contradictory, which is why we should attempt to harmonize all Scripture, such as what follows, beginning with JN 10:28:

The doctrine of perseverance or LGW serves as a bridge from the kerygma (creed) to the didache (lifelong spiritual growth) or from spiritual birth to maturity, so it is logical to harmonize various biblical statements on this issue before proceeding to other didachaic topics. The passages that seem to support predestination may be harmonized with those supporting free will or perseverance as follows:

1. John 10:27-29 – being “unsnatchable” does not disallow a person from choosing to jump out of the “Father’s hand”.

2. Romans 8:38-39 – “anything else” may refer to powers other than one’s own will.

3. Rom 14:4&10, Paul says not to judge a servant of Jesus, who is able to make them stand before God’s judgment. The verb “make” may mean “provide a way”.

4. 1Cor 1:8, 10:12 & 15:58, Paul says that Jesus will keep the Corinthian believers firm to the end, warns them that if they think they are standing firm to be careful that they don’t fall and therefore, stand firm, letting nothing move them from the work of the Lord. These verses indicate that standing firm involves a believer cooperating with the way Jesus provides.

5. 2Cor 1:20-24, Paul says that God makes us stand firm in Christ and anointed our hearts with the HS as a seal and deposit; it is by faith that we stand firm. This indicates that the way God provides for standing firm is for believers to persevere in cooperating with the HS.

6. Ephesians 1:11-14 – what is “predestined” is God’s plan to choose or elect anyone who desires to be “in him” or to satisfy GRFS. Thus, being “marked in him with a seal” does not abrogate moral free will (cf. 2PT 1:10f).

7. 1 John 2:19 – when synthesized with verse 24 must mean that those who repudiate their Faith do not eternally “belong”.

8. Psalm 135:6 – in light of “volitional verses” (such as DT 30:19 & MT 23:37) means that God “pleases” to permit limited free will.

9. Proverbs 21:1 – in order not to make God responsible for the sins cited in the rest of the chapter must mean that the “king’s heart” or will is choosing to cooperate with the Lord’s “hand” or directions.

Scriptures that teach the possibility of apostasy include the following:

MT 10:22, “All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.”

RM 11:22, “Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off.”

1CR 15:2, “By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain.”

GL 5:4, “You who are trying to be justified by law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace.”

CL 1:22-23, “But now he has reconciled you by Christ’s physical body through death to present you holy in his sight, without blemish and free from accusation—if you continue in your faith, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel.”

2THS 1:4-5, “Therefore, among God’s churches we boast about your perseverance and faith in all the persecutions and trials you are enduring. All this is evidence that God’s judgment is right, and as a result you will be counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which you are suffering.”

2TM 2:12, “If we endure, we will also reign with him. If we disown him, he will also disown us;”

HB 3:6&14, “But Christ is faithful as a son over God’s house. And we are his house, if we hold on to our courage and the hope of which we boast… We have come to share in Christ if we hold firmly till the end the confidence we had at first.”

HB 6:4-6, “It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age, if they fall away, to be brought back to repentance, because to their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.”

HB 10:26-36, “If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God… So do not throw away your confidence; it will be richly rewarded. You need to persevere so that when you have done the will of God, you will receive what he has promised.”

JM 1:12, “Blessed is the man who perseveres under trial, because when he has stood the test, he will receive the crown of life that God has promised to those who love him.”

2PT 1:10-11, “Therefore, my brothers, be all the more eager to make your calling and election sure. For if you do these things, you will never fall, and you will receive a rich welcome into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.”

2PT 2:20, “If they have escaped the corruption of the world by knowing our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and are again entangled in it and overcome, they are worse off at the end than they were at the beginning.”

1JN 2:24-25, “See that what you have heard from the beginning remains in you. If it does, you also will remain in the Son and in the Father. And this is what he promised us—even eternal life.”

JUDE 21, “Keep yourselves in God’s love as you wait for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ to bring you to eternal life.”

RV 2:10, “Do not be afraid of what you are about to suffer. I tell you, the devil will put some of you in prison to test you, and you will suffer persecution for ten days. Be faithful, even to the point of death, and I will give you the crown of life.”
 
Oct 19, 2024
1,740
441
83
But God has much love. For one thing, he LOVES justice (Ps 11:7)! So, how is God unjust by giving sinners what they deserve? You act as though sinners are worthy of God's grace, mercy and compassion.
Obviously God would be unjust if He gave some sinners what they deserve but not others. I assume you think you are in the batch that will NOT get what he deserves. What luck, if true, but a God who would hate the non-elect people would easily be tricky enough to deceive you with bogus Scripture saying that you are saved. However, Jesus and Paul acted/taught as though God is all-loving. Whew!
(Thank goodness you were not a NT writer! :^)
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,978
397
83
Yes he’s good and did all that he doesn’t forbid one man from believing and make another man incapable of refusing though ….he’s done his part for all mankind

about part is to believe it or reject it
He also doesn't forbid men to continue in their love for the darkness since their deeds are evil. He allows them to wallow in the muck and mire of their own evil hearts which they love doing anyway! So...what is unjust about that?
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,355
521
113
We don't twist anything. It is YOU who perverts God's justice because you obviously think that all mankind is worthy of God's salvation. Soo....if God doesn't make salvation possible for all then that makes him many nasty things in your world. Thankfully, I don't live in your world, nor would I ever want to!
O Rufus, the Aloofus?...
How art thou on this rare, nice day?
Rufus, the Aloofus? ...
Who keeps repeating the same wrong notion?...
.......... Why , tell me why?
Must you always push to have your own way?



:rolleyes: ..... Oh dear...

Its getting harder and harder to find a baby sitter.

Hebrews 5:12
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,847
639
113
1. We agree that salvation is not universal, but I believe 1TM 2:3-4, DT 30:19, etal indicate that God wants it to be or offers grace to all people, whereas you provide no Scripture to support belief that God hates the non-elect part of humanity and condemns them to hell with no chance to be saved.
Were it true that God wants it offered to everyone, then one's acceptance of the offer would make salvation of their work and they
their own savior, not Christ. For Christ to be Savior, He must have accomplished all on the behalf of those to be saved; that is, all of the requirements necessary for salvation - with there being nothing yet to be finished - completed by us - including our choice, otherwise, He wouldn't be the Savior, we would be, but the scripture is extremely clear that He alone is Savior.

2. We agree that it is God's prerogative to dispense grace/salvation to whomever He so chooses to, but we disagree about "for whatever reason or no reason", as though His choice/election can be motivated by hatred or else a blind throw of the darts. I believe the reason must be love, because Jesus said we should love our enemies and be perfect like God (MT 5:44&48). You ascribe irrationality and hatred to God for no good/biblical reason.
God hates everyone not justified by Christ, so we all start equally from that position. Why? Because we, from the first moments of life, are sinners. Therefore, God owes us nothing. That He chooses to forgive and save anyone demonstrates His exceedingly great mercy and grace. Were it not solely for His mercy and grace, no one could be saved.

3. We agree that no one deserves or can earn grace/salvation by works or obeying moral law, but we disagree about whether faith is a meritorious work rather than merely one's will accepting God's work. My view is supported by EPH 2:8-10 and every other NT reference to faith/belief, because it harmonizes with Scripture teaching that God is all-loving, whereas your view interprets a few of those references as indicating God determines whether or not everyone repents or not, which makes God blamable for lack of repentance/faith.
Who do you think the "we" of Eph 2:8 -10 represents? The answer can be seen in Eph 2:1. The "we" represents those whom God already
had made spiritually alive:

[Eph 2:1 KJV] 1 And you [hath he quickened], who were dead in trespasses and sins;

Notice in Eph 2:1, the progression of events as stated therein: that they were dead; and then they were quickened (made alive).
Observe also that in being made alive, they contributed nothing to it whatsoever- it was all by God - He alone took them from death and gave them life with nothing else intervening between the two states- there was no acceptance of it on their part in order to have it: a spiritually dead person cannot assist with giving themselves life. Can you see that?

I wouldn't want to show up at the pearly gates holding that low opinion of God!
I don't have a low opinion of God if that is your implication. Rather, I have the highest possible opinion of God a man can have, as He took me from death and gave me life, from which, I came to believe in Him as my Savior.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,978
397
83
I did in the first sentence: Moral free will (MFW) only exists when there is the possibility of choosing between two qualitatively opposite moral options that we call good and evil.
You won't be happy in eternity either since man's nature will be fully and completely and eternally conformed to Christ, which means (drum roll, please....) no saint will be able to sin. No saint will ever experience again the battle between the "flesh and the Spirit", which means no saint will be making any choices contrary to their fully redeemed nature. You will surely feel like a fish out of water.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,978
397
83
O Rufus, the Aloofus?...
How art thou on this rare, nice day?
Rufus, the Aloofus? ...
Who keeps repeating the same wrong notion?...
.......... Why , tell me why?
Must you always push to have your own way?



:rolleyes: ..... Oh dear...

Its getting harder and harder to find a baby sitter.

Hebrews 5:12
I can easily understand why. You don't have much for anyone to work with.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,978
397
83
Not until you specify which of the twelve sons was chosen, elect, spiritual.

If say Judah was elect does that mean the other sons were reprobate?

If the 12 sons were spiritual why were their offspring not elect?
Were the 12 sons the federal heads of all Israel? :rolleyes:
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,978
397
83
Obviously God would be unjust if He gave some sinners what they deserve but not others. I assume you think you are in the batch that will NOT get what he deserves. What luck, if true, but a God who would hate the non-elect people would easily be tricky enough to deceive you with bogus Scripture saying that you are saved. However, Jesus and Paul acted/taught as though God is all-loving. Whew!
(Thank goodness you were not a NT writer! :^)
Oh...but I will get what I deserve because what I deserve does not depend on my own merit but on the merits of my Federal Head -- the Last Adam. My hope is in him, not myself. The Last Adam satisfied God's justice for all God's elect. Conversely, the non-elect get to pay the price for their own sins. So...both groups get what they deserve. I like Paul boast solely in the Cross of Christ!
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,847
639
113
3. We agree that no one deserves or can earn grace/salvation by works or obeying moral law, but we disagree about whether faith is a meritorious work rather than merely one's will accepting God's work. My view is supported by EPH 2:8-10 and every other NT reference to faith/belief, because it harmonizes with Scripture teaching that God is all-loving, whereas your view interprets a few of those references as indicating God determines whether or not everyone repents or not, which makes God blamable for lack of repentance/faith.
In my previous post, I should also have mentioned that according to Ephesians 2:8, we are saved solely by God's grace through faith, all of which is a gift from Him. If any part of it were a contribution from/by us, then the verse would contradict and invalidate itself,
which would be impossible.