Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,972
394
83
Your posts are confused.

You do not understand the incarnation and you keep babbling about before and after the incarnation.

We are not discussing the future judgement.

We are not discussing the return of Jesus.

Listen Rufus, when Jesus became one of us.
No, YOU are not discussing the future judgment. YOU are not discussing the return of Jesus because you refuse to discuss Mat 7:23 in its proper, eschatological context. You are the poster boy for "stuck on stupid" because you totally ignore the context of the above passage since it's a very inconvenient text for you free willers and what you believe about God's foreknowledge. Mat 7:23 is most definitely speaking to the day when Jesus returns and judges the world. And guess what, Charlie Brown, Jesus on judgment day won't be having any foreknowledge as you free willers define that term! You want no part of this passage because you have no legitimate answers to the questions I raised about Jesus lacking the attribute of omniscience on Judgment Day (which itself would make him less than divine) even though to judge righteously the Judge MUST know every thought, word and deed of everyone He is judging. If He doesn't actually know...then he's guessing at best. He'd be winging it. Under such conditions, it would be impossible for anyone to judged fairly and with equity.

You don't even want to address the questions I asked in my last post: Is Jesus Christ mortal now? Will He be mortal when he returns to raise the righteous and the wicked from the dead and judge the living and the dead?

It's a shame that you can't even detect your own duplicity!
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,350
520
113
No, YOU are not discussing the future judgment. YOU are not discussing the return of Jesus because you refuse to discuss Mat 7:23 in its proper, eschatological context. You are the poster boy for "stuck on stupid" because you totally ignore the context of the above passage since it's a very inconvenient text for you free willers and what you believe about God's foreknowledge. Mat 7:23 is most definitely speaking to the day when Jesus returns and judges the world. And guess what, Charlie Brown, Jesus on judgment day won't be having any foreknowledge as you free willers define that term! You want no part of this passage because you have no legitimate answers to the questions I raised about Jesus lacking the attribute of omniscience on Judgment Day (which itself would make him less than divine) even though to judge righteously the Judge MUST know every thought, word and deed of everyone He is judging. If He doesn't actually know...then he's guessing at best. He'd be winging it. Under such conditions, it would be impossible for anyone to judged fairly and with equity.

You don't even want to address the questions I asked in my last post: Is Jesus Christ mortal now? Will He be mortal when he returns to raise the righteous and the wicked from the dead and judge the living and the dead?

It's a shame that you can't even detect your own duplicity!
From what I have been able to decipher from your confusing comments....

When Matthew 7:23, states the following?

"And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity".

You were claiming that Jesus had to be omniscient to make such a declaration?

Is that correct?
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,350
520
113
You wouldn't know the truth if it stuck a boot up your rear end.

That's what you kind of alleged truth desires to do.

Why don't you just go and backslide.
It might just make you happier.
That way, you can go into bars and start your fights.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,972
394
83
From what I have been able to decipher from your confusing comments....

When Matthew 7:23, states the following?

"And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity".

You were claiming that Jesus had to be omniscient to make such a declaration?

Is that correct?
No, that's not correct. (You're another one with reading comp problems.) I said that in order for Jesus to make that kind of statement, i.e. "I NEVER KNEW YOU..." can only mean that on judgment day he obviously won't possess the attribute of omniscience which presents serious theological problems. How could he, as he won't have any knowledge about those those he'll be judging, or even more specifically won't have any knowledge whatsoever of false believers who will, of course, also come under his judgment.

Ball's in your court, bunky.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,972
394
83
That's what you kind of alleged truth desires to do.

Why don't you just go and backslide.
It might just make you happier.
That way, you can go into bars and start your fights.
Shirley, U didn't think I was just going to lay down and let you free willers post any kind of nonsense that comes into your noggins, did you?

Give me your interpretation of Mat 7:23 without any irrelevant fluff! I know that's asking a lot, but give it the ol' college try.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,350
520
113
No, that's not correct. (You're another one with reading comp problems.) I said that in order for Jesus to make that kind of statement, i.e. "I NEVER KNEW YOU..." can only mean that on judgment day he obviously won't possess the attribute of omniscience which presents serious theological problems. How could he, as he won't have any knowledge about those those he'll be judging, or even more specifically won't have any knowledge whatsoever of false believers who will, of course, also come under his judgment.

Ball's in your court, bunky.
"I never knew you," simply meant they never were saved.

No spiritual intimacy was had.

Like in the Bible it will say...

Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, “I have gotten a man with the help of the LORD.” Genesis 4:1​


.........
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,350
520
113
Shirley, U didn't think I was just going to lay down and let you free willers post any kind of nonsense that comes into your noggins, did you?

Give me your interpretation of Mat 7:23 without any irrelevant fluff! I know that's asking a lot, but give it the ol' college try.
When you can not understand the answer?
 
Dec 7, 2024
122
40
28
"I never knew you," simply meant they never were saved.

No spiritual intimacy was had.

Like in the Bible it will say...

Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, “I have gotten a man with the help of the LORD.” Genesis 4:1​


.........
I think you might consider there is a difference in the context and use of the word,knew.

In Genesis 4:1 it is used to tell us Adam had sex with Eve.

A totally different application of the word,knew, when Jesus says, I never knew you.
He isn't saying, I never had sex with you.
 
Oct 12, 2017
3,350
520
113
I think you might consider there is a difference in the context and use of the word,knew.

In Genesis 4:1 it is used to tell us Adam had sex with Eve.

A totally different application of the word,knew, when Jesus says, I never knew you.
He isn't saying, I never had sex with you.
When you are walking in the Spirit and in Truth?
You are having spiritual intercourse with God.

Google - spiritual intercourse with God
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,371
1,002
113
No, YOU are not discussing the future judgment. YOU are not discussing the return of Jesus because you refuse to discuss Mat 7:23 in its proper, eschatological context. You are the poster boy for "stuck on stupid" because you totally ignore the context of the above passage since it's a very inconvenient text for you free willers and what you believe about God's foreknowledge. Mat 7:23 is most definitely speaking to the day when Jesus returns and judges the world. And guess what, Charlie Brown, Jesus on judgment day won't be having any foreknowledge as you free willers define that term! You want no part of this passage because you have no legitimate answers to the questions I raised about Jesus lacking the attribute of omniscience on Judgment Day (which itself would make him less than divine) even though to judge righteously the Judge MUST know every thought, word and deed of everyone He is judging. If He doesn't actually know...then he's guessing at best. He'd be winging it. Under such conditions, it would be impossible for anyone to judged fairly and with equity.

You don't even want to address the questions I asked in my last post: Is Jesus Christ mortal now? Will He be mortal when he returns to raise the righteous and the wicked from the dead and judge the living and the dead?

It's a shame that you can't even detect your own duplicity!
I don't understand why you are getting so upset?

Your jumping up and down on one verse in Matthew.

Which has nothing to do with Romans 8:29, which is God saying that He previously foreknew the Jews.

I certainly don't define "foreknew" as a foreknowledge of the future.

I am not a 'free willer' and where do you get the idea that I was?

You may have thrown me in the Arminianism basket.

I disagree with them also.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,326
2,459
113
Election isn't about God choosing between you and me. That's selection. Election is God choosing Israel to be His people. Election is God choosing those in Christ.
In other words, God isn't choosing between entities that already exist...one to the exclusion of another. It means God chooses a people and then creates that people.
We'll just have to disagree what first is referring to.
He creates the other non selected people too.
"Create" does not nullify selection.
This is almost comical.
 
Oct 19, 2024
1,737
441
83
But the Son of God is eternal. Didn't anyone ever teach you about the PRE-INCARNATE Christ? How else could Jesus have seen the Father before he was even born? Or how else could Jesus have equated himself with the Father? Or how else could the Son of God have created the universe? Surely, you're not suggesting that the eternal Son of God ceased to be God's son at his incarnation, are you?

Are you trying to compound an already very sticky problem that you free willers have? In addition to the glorified, risen Christ losing his attribute of omniscience at his second coming which itself will be indispensable for judging everyone righteously, did he also lose his sonship status with the Father?

And since you brought up the Holy Spirit with respect to Jn 2:24-25, apparently Jesus will have lost the Spirit on Judgment Day since he becomes more ignorant on that day than he was during his first advent when he actually KNEW what was in all men's hearts. Clearly, the Holy Spirit is not going to reveal anything to the Second Person of the Godhead on the day of judgment. Care to address this issue?

Just keep digging that free willer hole more deeply and you will only create more problems for yourself; for lies only breed lies; falsehood breeds only falsehoods; error breeds only more errors. You will wind up becoming thoroughly ensnared in your own web of deceit. As the Good Book says somewhere, "There's a time to speak and a time to remain silent". You should quit doing the former to cut your aleady severe losses.
[/QUOTE]

"How else could Jesus have seen the Father before he was even born?": By looking in the mirror. (JN 14:9 :^)
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,037
6,859
113
62
He creates the other non selected people too.
"Create" does not nullify selection.
This is almost comical.
The difference between the 2 groups is the supernatural birth. Those who are created in Adam have natural births. Those created in Christ Jesus experience supernatural birth.
If God doesn't intervene supernaturally, would Isaac have been born? Why is this in the Bible? What is God teaching? Related to John 3?
You are so stuck on a particular doctrine, you won't examine all the scripture has to say fairly. Selection is choosing between what is in existence. Election, biblically, is choosing and then bringing into existence something that was not. There was no nation Israel until God formed it supernaturally through Abraham. And there is no you except God created you supernaturally in Christ.
 
Nov 14, 2024
526
310
63
Election, biblically, is choosing and then bringing into existence something that was not.
Election, biblically speaking, and as you have already been shown, is simply this:

Isa 42:1
Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.
Isa 42:2
He shall not cry, nor lift up, nor cause his voice to be heard in the street.
Isa 42:3
A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth.
Isa 42:4
He shall not fail nor be discouraged, till he have set judgment in the earth: and the isles shall wait for his law.

God's (mine) elect or chosen is Jesus Christ.

Mat 12:15
But when Jesus knew it, he withdrew himself from thence: and great multitudes followed him, and he healed them all;
Mat 12:16
And charged them that they should not make him known:
Mat 12:17
That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying,
Mat 12:18
Behold my servant, whom I have chosen; my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my spirit upon him, and he shall shew judgment to the Gentiles.
Mat 12:19
He shall not strive, nor cry; neither shall any man hear his voice in the streets.
Mat 12:20
A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall he not quench, till he send forth judgment unto victory.
Mat 12:21
And in his name shall the Gentiles trust.

Whether you will ever admit it or not, Jesus Christ is God's elect or chosen means of salvation, and those who were chosen IN HIM before the foundation of the world (Eph. 1:4) are those whom God, in his foreknowledge, knew would respond favorably to the gospel of Jesus Christ; thereby being found to be IN HIM.

It really is that simple, and I only bothered to mention it again for the potential benefits of any lurkers who might be following this thread so that they might not be led astray with any of the nonsense that certain people have been posting here.
 
Oct 12, 2017
3,350
520
113
I don't understand why you are getting so upset?

Your jumping up and down on one verse in Matthew.

Which has nothing to do with Romans 8:29, which is God saying that He previously foreknew the Jews.

I certainly don't define "foreknew" as a foreknowledge of the future.

I am not a 'free willer' and where do you get the idea that I was?

You may have thrown me in the Arminianism basket.

I disagree with them also.
They always quickly throw you into the Arminian basket...
He must keep his "trigger points" simple.

For, making him re-think things ruins his reactionary, lack of impulse control.

.......
 
Dec 7, 2024
122
40
28
Election, biblically speaking, and as you have already been shown, is simply this:

Isa 42:1
Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.
Isa 42:2
He shall not cry, nor lift up, nor cause his voice to be heard in the street.
Isa 42:3
A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth.
Isa 42:4
He shall not fail nor be discouraged, till he have set judgment in the earth: and the isles shall wait for his law.

God's (mine) elect or chosen is Jesus Christ.

Mat 12:15
But when Jesus knew it, he withdrew himself from thence: and great multitudes followed him, and he healed them all;
Mat 12:16
And charged them that they should not make him known:
Mat 12:17
That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying,
Mat 12:18
Behold my servant, whom I have chosen; my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my spirit upon him, and he shall shew judgment to the Gentiles.
Mat 12:19
He shall not strive, nor cry; neither shall any man hear his voice in the streets.
Mat 12:20
A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall he not quench, till he send forth judgment unto victory.
Mat 12:21
And in his name shall the Gentiles trust.

Whether you will ever admit it or not, Jesus Christ is God's elect or chosen means of salvation, and those who were chosen IN HIM before the foundation of the world (Eph. 1:4) are those whom God, in his foreknowledge, knew would respond favorably to the gospel of Jesus Christ; thereby being found to be IN HIM.

It really is that simple, and I only bothered to mention it again for the potential benefits of any lurkers who might be following this thread so that they might not be led astray with any of the nonsense that certain people have been posting here.
When Jesus told his Disciples he they did not choose him but he chose them for his Salvation and service how do Christians argue he stopped there? So that now we have to choose him.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,972
394
83
"I never knew you," simply meant they never were saved.

No spiritual intimacy was had.

Like in the Bible it will say...

Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, “I have gotten a man with the help of the LORD.” Genesis 4:1​
.........
Just to be crystal clear on what you're saying: When Jesus said "I never knew you...", he was really saying *I* never had a personal, intimate, covenant relationship with you which is why "they never were saved" correct? In your mind the passage has nothing to do with Jesus' prescience (omniscience), right?