The hatred of Jews

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

ThereRoseaLamb

Well-known member
Jan 17, 2023
5,332
2,330
113
No, no, a better analogy would be the illegal Haitians and other illegals deported all legal Americans, and then started to claim that they were the true Americans all along, and the actual true Americans are just terrorists, and besides, God never gave them America in the first place - it was promised long ago to Haitians (who are really the true Americans). Then new anti-Americanism laws are introduced that make it illegal for anyone to criticise what the Haitians or illegals had done or were doing to the true Americans. Then a third party - let's say the Germans - come in and say they can help the few Americans that are left as they are being treated as terrorists, by taking control of America and building homes for real Americans in Mexico, but they would have to leave America, and wouldn't have any right to return (except by converting to the Satanic voodoo religion and claiming to be descended from Haitians).

Not according to history or the Bible. Wrong on all counts.
 

Smoke

Senior Member
Oct 27, 2016
1,738
646
113
No one is "triggered" they are Arabs. There is no Palestinian people, it's a political ploy. They are Arabs from the surrounding countries.
You're clearly triggered when people refer to the "Arabs" of that particular ethnonational group as "Palestinians". Not all Arabs are Palestinians, but if it enables you to stay on point and discuss in good faith, then I'll call them "Palestinian Arabs" to distinguish them from Arabs of other areas (like we did prior to 1964). Would "Palestinian Arab" work for you or would it still be triggering?
 

Smoke

Senior Member
Oct 27, 2016
1,738
646
113
@ThereRoseaLamb

I sincerely want to understand your positioning and know how you got there. If you don't mind answering a few questions so I can better understand:

1.) Do you agree that Britain and France promised the Arabs in what was called "Palestine", at the time, their own nation state in what we currently call "Israel" conditioned if they help fight with us during WWI?

2.) Do you agree they promised those Palestinian Arabs the land known as Palestine prior to the signing of the Balfour Declaration (1917)?

3.) Was the promise to the Palestinian Arabs ever fulfilled? Why or why not?

I have more questions, but I think it's important we at least are on the same page here before continuing.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,771
9,238
113
Do you agree that Britain and France promised the Arabs in what was called "Palestine", at the time, their own nation state in what we currently call "Israel" conditioned if they help fight with us during WWI?
Yes. They got that promised nation.

It’s called Jordan. Quadruple the size of present day Israel.

Of course they wouldn’t accept the “Palestinians” Muslims that reside in Israel.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
38,670
7,156
113
Heretics are those who reject the essential tenants of the Gospel unto Salvation and are therefore not born again.
No, not all heretics, only those with a damnable heresy. The definition of heresy is school of thought, every single believer, every denomination can be seen as a school of thought. Only those that reject the items of the faith are damnable heresies.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
7,130
2,846
113
@ThereRoseaLamb

I sincerely want to understand your positioning and know how you got there. If you don't mind answering a few questions so I can better understand:

1.) Do you agree that Britain and France promised the Arabs in what was called "Palestine", at the time, their own nation state in what we currently call "Israel" conditioned if they help fight with us during WWI?

2.) Do you agree they promised those Palestinian Arabs the land known as Palestine prior to the signing of the Balfour Declaration (1917)?

3.) Was the promise to the Palestinian Arabs ever fulfilled? Why or why not?

I have more questions, but I think it's important we at least are on the same page here before continuing.
Correct, Britain made three promises in 1915, and only kept one according to the historical record.
 
Jan 17, 2023
5,332
2,330
113
@ThereRoseaLamb

I sincerely want to understand your positioning and know how you got there. If you don't mind answering a few questions so I can better understand:

1.) Do you agree that Britain and France promised the Arabs in what was called "Palestine", at the time, their own nation state in what we currently call "Israel" conditioned if they help fight with us during WWI?
Britain had no right to promise anything. Arabs refused the land that they were offered. They could have had a two state solution, they refused. The land belongs to the Jews, it was their homeland, 3000 yrs of proven history there. The Brits are now being taken over by Muslims, and I believe it's because of what they did to the Jewish people.
 

Smoke

Senior Member
Oct 27, 2016
1,738
646
113
Britain had no right to promise anything. Arabs refused the land that they were offered. They could have had a two state solution, they refused. The land belongs to the Jews, it was their homeland, 3000 yrs of proven history there. The Brits are now being taken over by Muslims, and I believe it's because of what they did to the Jewish people.
So by stating "Britain had no right", the logical entailment you are acknowledging is that they (along with France) appealed to the Palestinian Arabs to help overthrow their rulers (the Ottomans) and made them a promise that Palestine (the area known as modern day Israel) would be theirs. Got it.

When you say that "Arabs refused the land", would it be similar to an illegal immigrant coming to your house (European Jews who didn't have land or property claims over the Palestinians living there), offering you the right stay in your garage while they take over the rest of it, and when you say "Heck no!", you would technically be "refusing" to live on your property (the garage)?

As far as Brits being taken over by Muslims, that doesn't concern me. What relevance is that? Do you still think all Muslims are Palestinian? Why do you conflate different and unique groups of people together that are different? There are many illegal Mexicans that are Christian... does that mean they are American somehow? I am failing to understand how you connect the dots.
 

Smoke

Senior Member
Oct 27, 2016
1,738
646
113
To be clear, the argument is "Britain didn't have the right to promise the land to the Palestinians for helping defeat the Ottoman empire" but they DID have the right to break their promise to the Palestinians and give the land to the Jews. Either they have the right to give it away or they don't.
 

Smoke

Senior Member
Oct 27, 2016
1,738
646
113
Yes. They got that promised nation.

It’s called Jordan. Quadruple the size of present day Israel.

Of course they wouldn’t accept the “Palestinians” Muslims that reside in Israel.
Correct me if I'm wrong (and I may)... but Transjordan was not part of Palestine. Furthermore, Palestine, specifically, was what was promised to the Palestinian Arabs and not Transjordan. Did you learn something differently?

My point is, if I promised you a Lexus for helping me do some work, but then after you fulfilled your obligation, I said "Eh, take this Camry instead... it's similar...", that doesn't mean I fulfilled my promise to you. The Camry was never part of the agreement. Would you disagree?
 
Jan 17, 2023
5,332
2,330
113
So by stating "Britain had no right",
The land was the Jewish homeland. Why do you think they wanted to come back to Israel after the Holocaust?! It wasn't Britain's to carve up.


When you say that "Arabs refused the land", would it be similar to an illegal immigrant coming to your house (European Jews who didn't have land or property claims over the Palestinians living there), offering you the right stay in your garage while they take over the rest of it, and when you say "Heck no!", you would technically be "refusing" to live on your property (the garage)?
No, it isn't like that at all. It was their homeland. Arabs have their own homeland, it isn't Israel.

As far as Brits being taken over by Muslims, that doesn't concern me.
It should, read history.


Do you still think all Muslims are Palestinian?
Where did I say that?!



Why do you conflate different and unique groups of people together that are different? There are many illegal Mexicans that are Christian... does that mean they are American somehow? I am failing to understand how you connect the dots.
Not sure I understand your question. But I'll post the following video and perhaps you'll understand where I am coming from.




 

Smoke

Senior Member
Oct 27, 2016
1,738
646
113
The land was the Jewish homeland. Why do you think they wanted to come back to Israel after the Holocaust?! It wasn't Britain's to carve up.
How can one "come back" to a place they have never been? When Palestinian Arabs were promised Palestine (modern day Israel), it was only 7.9% Jewish. The rest were Palestinian Arab. Feel free to fact check me if you think this figure is wrong.

Also, you're aware that the allies fought against Hitler's ideology, but nevertheless, were in fact not big fans of Jews? A huge motivation of screwing over the Palestinians and giving the land to the Jews was a way to rid Europe of the Jews. Do you disagree this was a motivation?

No, it isn't like that at all. It was their homeland. Arabs have their own homeland, it isn't Israel.
So where is the homeland of the Palestinian Arabs who were born, raised, and had legal deeds, etc... prior to the end of WWI since it's not Palestine/Israel?

You're saying the Palestinian Arabs that were actually born in Palestine/Israel DON'T have a homeland, but that the European Jews who were born in Europe, have a new Homeland in Israel because Britain gave them the land?




It should, read history.
I do, but I'm not sure how it's relevant to the discussion of promises broken to the Palestinian Arabs. Make your argument since I'm incapable of reading your mind.




Where did I say that?!
You elude to this by bringing up Muslims in the UK are overtaking it and that the neighboring Arabs should take in the Palestinian Arabs simply because they are Arabs. As if that a valid and convincing reason for the Palestinian Arabs to abandon Gaza.




Not sure I understand your question. But I'll post the following video and perhaps you'll understand where I am coming from.
Yeah, I'm a Shapiro fan. I disagree with him on pretty much everything as it pertains to the history/the Nakba though. I've personally spoken to an elder man (when he was a young boy) who had to abandon his home due to threats by the Jews. The only way the Jews could create a democracy in the middle east is if they outnumbered the Palestinian Arabs. How do they do that when they are such a small percentage of the population? The Nakba is your answer.
 
Jan 17, 2023
5,332
2,330
113

How can one "come back" to a place they have never been? When Palestinian Arabs were promised Palestine (modern day Israel), it was only 7.9% Jewish. The rest were Palestinian Arab. Feel free to fact check me if you think this figure is wrong.
Well, according to pictures and Mark Twain, it was a stopping place on the road for nomadic people. There was nothing there. I have a book that was given to me with pictures showing Israel then and now. It was barren land "owned" by rich overseers. The Jews bought back their homeland at inflated prices, even though it was hardly worth having.


Also, you're aware that the allies fought against Hitler's ideology, but nevertheless, were in fact not big fans of Jews?
Exactly who were not "big fans" of the Jews?

A huge motivation of screwing over the Palestinians and giving the land to the Jews was a way to rid Europe of the Jews. Do you disagree this was a motivation? It was totally a political move to keep Jews from having a homeland.
No such people as Palestinians. They are Arabs from Arab countries.



You elude to this by bringing up Muslims in the UK are overtaking it and that the neighboring Arabs should take in the Palestinian Arabs simply because they are Arabs. As if that a valid and convincing reason for the Palestinian Arabs to abandon Gaza.
The Bibas family was "returned", at least their bodies were. There will never be peace in Gaza. They have had offer after offer for peace and have said no to all. They scream from the river to the sea, only they understand what they are calling for, not like some dumb Americans. They refuse Israel their homeland. Yes, they need to go back to the countries they came from. They refuse to live in peace. If you watched the video, you know that is fact. Israel sits on 1% of the land in the ME and the Arabs won't even allow them that. Jews have a right to a homeland, their homeland.


Yeah, I'm a Shapiro fan. I disagree with him on pretty much everything as it pertains to the history/the Nakba though. I've personally spoken to an elder man (when he was a young boy) who had to abandon his home due to threats by the Jews. The only way the Jews could create a democracy in the middle east is if they outnumbered the Palestinian Arabs. How do they do that when they are such a small percentage of the population? The Nakba is your answer.
Israel does have a democracy, it is the only one in the ME, and are our allies. He's telling the historical truth of what happened. I don't see what there is to disagree with. Unless you think he's lying.