No, you did not.
Jesus has come and gone. He walked in the 2nd temple and conquered the world by not sinning and dieing for our sins.
I agree, but this irrelevant to the actual discussion.
Most prophesies are conditional.
??? Would you care to give at least two examples of what you mean by this?
The 70 week prophesy in Dan 9 finished and Israel did not accept Jesus.
It is not finished, and you will never be able to prove that it is.
In the middle of the 70th week Jesus died and told the disciples to witness to the house of Israel first.
Is it safe to assume that you believe that Jesus is the "he" in this prophecy?
Dan 9:27
And
he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week
he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations
he shall make
it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
Is Jesus the first "he?" The second "he?" The third "he?" All three "he's?" None of the "he's?"
Whatever your assertion may be, please prove it from scripture. After all, you said that this prophecy is finished, so you must believe that you know who these "he's" are referring to.
Their time was up.
Jesus said Mat 23:38 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
In case you have not noticed, Israel still exists as a nation, and God is still striving with Israelites/Jews today while trying to bring them to salvation through Christ.
The only time the word "temple" is found in Micah is ..Mic 1:2 Hear, all ye people; hearken, O earth, and all that therein is: and let the Lord GOD be witness against you, the Lord from his holy temple.
This is an absolute lie.
I have already shown you that the word which is translated as "house" in Micah 4:1-2 is translated as "temple" elsewhere in the Old Testament, and that it is translated as "temple" in Micah chapter 4 in several Bible versions.
I have also already shown you that Jesus referred to the temple in Jerusalem as "my Father's house."
Then, of course, the context itself is clearly speaking of a yet-future literal temple in Jerusalem.
But wait! There's more!
Mic 4:1
But in the last days it shall come to pass,
that the mountain of the house of the LORD shall be established in the top of the mountains, and it shall be exalted above the hills; and people shall flow unto it.
There are multitudes of verses in the Old Testament where "the house of the LORD" refers specifically to a temple in Jerusalem, and you can see this for yourself here.
https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?Criteria=house+of+the+LORD&t=KJV#s=s_primary_0_1
With this reality before us, God most definitely foretold of a literal, physical temple in Mt. Zion in Jerusalem in the last days, and Christ will ultimately reign over this earth while seated within it. You know, that whole inheriting the throne of his father David thing.
Furthermore, Micah's prophecy is but one of several prophecies which accurately foretell of the same, so stop deluding yourself while promoting lies.
The holy temple is in Heaven above.
Rev 3:12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.
Jesus is in the Heavenly temple now as the high priest, advocating our sins.
Yes, there is a temple in heaven, and, yes, Jesus is fulfilling his role as our High Priest there as I type, and? I never suggested otherwise.
It is not a strawman argument.
It is absolutely a straw man argument, and you have continued to make it here. In other words, whereas I am discussing a literal, physical temple in Jerusalem which God has clearly foretold will exist in the last days, you keep on arguing about either the temple in heaven or how Christians are the spiritual temple. I have never denied either of those two realities, but you are the one who is denying the reality that I am actually talking about with your constant straw man arguments.
The facts are plan. Paul wrote in many places that the temple is Spiritual and that there is no distinction between the Jew or gentile today.
We are all one in Jesus.
Those are a part of the facts, and I have never denied them, nor have I ever uttered a word against them.
With so many verses pointing to us being the Spiritual temple and that we are Spiritual Israel by believing in Jesus this leaves the literal argument without foundation.
Only in your delusionary mind. There are plenty of scriptures, in both the Old Testament and New Testament, which provide plenty of foundation for the literal last days temple argument. The only reason why you cannot see them is because you have willfully shut your eyes to the same. That is your problem. A last days temple will come...just as God foretold.
Anyhow, I have three appointments which I need to keep this morning/this afternoon, so I will have to address some of the other nonsensical comments which have recently been made here at a later time.