I am staunchly KJV-only. I was saved over a decade ago now... Spent 7 years using what ever translation I fancied till one day I decided to ask God what Bible he created. Became KJV onlyist after a few months of research. And have stayed KJV only due to research, prayer, and the Holy Ghost.
I'll listen to your debate and tell you my thoughts,
I skipped to the intro at roughly 2:30 and right now listening to Dollar's intro which already he is appealing to authority and attacking people who have supposedly held the position... Snakey Snakey....
Your intro at roughly 5 minutes is better and more personable intro on who you are and stuff. You rambled a bit from the topic of Scripture being infallible to your salvation back to the other topic back to last. NOTHING WRONG with that. Just shows you were not reading a necessarily pre-rehersed script but were ad-libbing.
SO already by the intro's. One could assume debate is going to go with Dollar appealing to authority and trying to shotgun information while you are more reactionary and trying to give your personal research or experience.
Now on your intro at 11 minutes.
Im at roughly 12 minutes... If you are going to be going through slides in a few seconds, don't add very vibrant pictures or pics at all. It draws the persons eyes away from the text then the slide changes... They are distracting... Pictures are best used when you are going to linger on a slide to keep the attention of those who don't really pay attention.
(Later on you use pictures correctly with clipart and the such, but your first few slides the pictures were overwhelming IMO.)
You put a LOT of effort into this, that is apparent.
Now, at 14:21 I disagree with how you made your conclusion of your premise.
Instead of going "we would logically come to this position" because then your opponent goes "I and my friends did not come to that conclusion and we have PHD's so therefore you are wrong...."
It is better to go with a structured argument such as Isaiah 28, Precept upon Precept, line upon line... IN ANOTHER TOUNGUE... Precept upon Precept... Psalm 12:6-7 the WORDS of the Lord are PURE.....
Therefore since the Book of the Lord is Scripture, and Scripture says it is PURE and given by God into other languages....
It's the same place you are trying to go, but doesn't allow for GUESS WORK...
And if your opponent counters with the KJV was written by men... you can counter with 1 thess 2:13
Your 1st Corinthians argument was good and concise, could again have reinforced it, but with that argument I think it's best to let them attack it so they can trap themselves instead of defending it. Because when they attack it the trap is quick and easy.
3rd pillar, Ephesians-Romans 10:17 argument was sound.
4th pillar, YES this is where you build your argument.
19:10 AMEN! AMEN! Yes, I wish you would have come out the gate like this, STRAIGHT to the point attack them from the start, don't play their game of prefacing..... TWO EDGED SWORD!
20:20, we differ there, they do not potentially lead to that. THEY DO CAUSE THAT, that is the GOAL of them.
22:40, not only singular and plural pronouns... INDICATIVE TENSE!
So english does not singular or plural, it also does not have INDICATIVE tense.
If I say "I am going to the store" when am I going? Today? Tomorrow? Right now? In an hour? WHEN?
You have to guess...
But eth and est are INDICATIVE which means in the present moment Fact, letting you know that it is RIGHT NOW FACT.
No modern perversion has Indicative or Plural and Singular pronouns both of which are in "the greek and hebrew"... Surely if someone wanted "the greek and hebrew" in English they would go to the KJV which actually has the tenses and pronouns of those languages.
24:00, good point thank you I learned something new today. I didn't know they attack in Matthew 1:1, first verse in the NT, attacked. Poetic.
For the past 10 minutes, AMEN!!!!
AMEN! AMEN!
Now, one critique is that you didn't show they attack salvation.
1 Cor 1:18
The change Preaching into "the message" and "the word" (lowercase)... The same perversions who change it to "the word" also use "the word" lowercase in 1 John 1 to refer to Jesus showing that they are saying Jesus is a fool.
"The Message" is the gospel, which the modern perversions are calling a fool.
But we know it is PREACHING that is foolish because Ecclesiastes says a man with many words is a fool, and preaching is MANY WORDS.
Then at the end they change SAVED past tense, to BEING SAVED future tense for no rhyme or reason except to cause doubt in salvation.
In all, good job. I will watch the rest later (likely in segments). Dude, you did PHENOMENAL.
Note: I am being hyper critical in this. The reason being is I think you were being hyper critical on yourself in the post.
As far as your time management, I see no issue so far, your introduction was not well managed, but that is fine it was personable.
Your slides were well rehersed I see no issue there, NONE.
Your public speaking is fine, the "umms" were not distracting, I can recall one time where I noticed a pause with an"um" which is FINE you are human, no issue. 1 Pause in 30 minutes... You can't do better.
The pacing was random, sometimes to fast, sometimes to slow. I know you were trying to cram at the end, you felt rushed... SO It is not a big deal, ESPECIALLY since this is on YOUTUBE, where people can pause and rewind.
Speaking fast can actually be a BLESSING today for children are used to videos that a at 1.5x speed. They dislike slower pacing today.
As far as your other points, I will see when I get there...