That's what Jeremiah 31:33 states.
The old law is spoken about negatively, as sin and slavery.
The Psalms express an extremely positive view of the Mosaic Law, such as with David repeatedly saying that he loved it and delighted in obeying it, so if we consider the Psalms to be Scripture and to therefore express a correct view of obeying it, then we will also delight in obeying it. For example, in Psalms 1:1-2, blessed are those who delight in the Law of the Lord and who meditate on it day and night, so we can't believe in the truth of these words as Scripture while not allowing them to shape our view of obeying the Mosaic Law. Moreover, the NT authors considered the Psalms to be Scripture, so they should be interpreted as though they were in complete agreement with them, especially because Paul also said that he delighted in obeying it (Romans 7:22). Having a negative view of the Mosaic Law is incompatible with the view that the Psalms are Scripture and is expressing an equally negative view of the Lawgiver.
This is milk and Christianity 101 which means basic, entry level knowledge.
Christianity 101 should be that followers of God should follow His commands in accordance with the example that Jesus set for us to follow.
Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law- Galatians 3:13
According to Deuteronomy 28, the blessing of the law is lawfulness while the curse of the law is lawlessness, so Jesus redeemed us from the curse of lawlessness so that we could be free to enjoy the blessing of lawfulness. In Titus 2:14, it does not say that Jesus gave himself to redeem us from the Law of God, but in order to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so the way to believe in what Jesus spent his ministry teaching by word and by example and in what he accomplished through the cross is by repenting and becoming zealous for doing good works in obedience to the Mosaic Law (Acts 21:20).
the law entangles with the yoke of bondage- Galatians 5:1
If God saves the Israelites out of bondage in Egypt in order to put them under bondage to His law, then it would be for bondage that God sets us free, however, Galatians 5:1 says that it is for freedom that God sets us free, so you are not correctly identifying what Paul was speaking against. In Psalms 119:142, the Law of God is truth, and in John 8:31-36, it is lawlessness that puts us into bondage while the truth sets us free.
Jesus made us free from the law of sin and death- Romans 8:2
In Romans 7:25-8:2, Paul contrasted the Law of God with the law of sin and contrasted the Law of the Spirit with the law of sin and death, so the Law of God is not the law of sin and death. In Romans 8:4-7, Paul contrasted those who walk in the Spirit with those who have minds set on the flesh who are enemies of God who refuse to submit to the Law of God. In Romans 7, Paul said that the Law of God is good, that he wanted to do good, that he delighted in obeying it, and that he served it with his mind, but contrasted it with the law of sin that was working within his members, that was causing him not to do the good that he wanted to, the held him captive, and that he served with his flesh.
we are not under the law- Romans 6:15
The Law of God leads us to do what is holy, righteous, and good (Romans 7:12) while the law of sin leads us in the opposite direction by stirring up sinful passions in order to bear fruit unto death (Romans 7:5). In Romans 6:14, Paul descried the law that we are not under as being a law where sin had dominion over us, which does not describe the Law of God, but rather it is the law of sin where sin had dominion over us. In Psalms 119:29-30, he wanted to put false ways far from him, for God to be gracious to him by teaching him to obey His law, and he chose the way of faith by setting it before him, so this has always been the one and only way of salvation by grace through faith, this is what it means to be under grace, and this is why those who are under grace are not permitted to do what the Law of God reveals to be sin (Romans 6:15), so we are still under it, but are not under under the law of sin.
if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law - Galatians 5:18
The Spirit is God, so would be absurd to interpret that as saying that we aren't led by God when we are led by God. In Galatian 5:16-23, Paul contrasted the desires of the flesh with the desires of the Spirit and everything that he listed as works of the flesh that are against the Spirit are also against the Mosaic Law while all of the fruits of the Spirit are in accordance with it. If we weren't under the Mosaic Law, then we would be free to partake in what it reveals to be the works of the flesh, but that is the opposite of what Paul was saying. Rather, the desires of the flesh causing us not to do the good that we want to do is how Paul described his struggle with the law of sin in Romans 7, so that is the law that we aren't under when we are led by the Spirit. In Ezekiel 36:26-27, the Spirit has the role of leading us to obey the Law of God.
the strength of sin is the law
In Romans 7:7, the Law of God is not sinful, but is how we know what sin is, however, a law that is the strength of sin is sinful, therefore that verses is not referring to the Law of God, but rather it is the law of sin that is the strength of sin.
The fact that the Law of God brings wrath for those who refuse to obey it is not a very good reason to refuse to obey it.
ye also are become dead to the law - Romans 7:4
It would be absurd to think that the way to becoming unified with Christ is by dying to His instructions or to think that the way to become unified with God's word made flesh is by dying to God's word or to think that the way to bear fruit for God is by dying to His instructions for how to bear fruit for Him. Rather, we need to die to a law that was hindering us from bearing fruit for God, namely the law of sin.
we are delivered from the law- Romans 7:6
we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter- Romans 7:6
In Romans 7:22-23, Paul said that he delighted in obeying the Law of God, but contrasted it with the law of sin that held him captive. In would be absurd to interpret Romans 7:5 as referring to the Law of God as if Paul delighted in stirring up sinful passions in order to bear fruit unto to death, but rather that is the role of the law of sin. Likewise, it would be absurd to interpret Romans 7:6 as if Paul delighted in being held captive to sin, but rather it is the law of sin that he described as holding him captive. Verses that would be absurd for Paul to delight in doing should not be interpreted as referring to the Law of God, such as in 1 Corinthians 15:56, it would be absurd to interpret that as Paul delighting in the strength of sin, with interpreting Romans 6:14 as Paul delighting in sin having dominion over him, or with interpreting Romans 5:20 as Paul delighting in causing sin to increase, but rather this is the role of the law of sin. Paul was a servant of God, so it should not make sense to you to interpret him in a way that turns him against obeying what God has commanded.