So share with us the evidence that makes this an "educated" guess. BTW I don't think the courts make a distinction between "slander" and "guess".Its not an accusation, its an educated guess.
So share with us the evidence that makes this an "educated" guess. BTW I don't think the courts make a distinction between "slander" and "guess".Its not an accusation, its an educated guess.
Tucker doesn't want a muslim death cult government willing to wage nuclear war against the world to be stopped?
Its not an accusation, its an educated guess.
I would not use the word awesome, I would say completely despicable on Cruz's part to be demanding war while knowing next to nothing about the country. Makes him look like a puppet of the military industrial complex.
Yes I did, but I provided several pieces of hard evidence to support that. I have more evidence and If ever I am brought before the court I will call those witnesses as well.Well @ZNP has also made an educated guess that Musk is a Satanist because of an outfit he wore, but the real point is but he only gets upset/defensive when it is his team.
Yes I did, but I provided several pieces of hard evidence to support that. I have more evidence and If ever I am brought before the court I will call those witnesses as well.
Are you saying Cosplay is not Satanic? I would say dressing up as a character in a movie, video game or some other form of media is a form of idolatry.Sure.... did you have a tape of him admitting it in a serious truthful manner, otherwise the rest is less than circumstantial and is more likely cosplay.
Are you saying Cosplay is not Satanic? I would say dressing up as a character in a movie, video game or some other form of media is a form of idolatry.
We are not talking about a documentary where the actor is portraying a real life character, we are talking about fictional characters and fantasy. To dress up as this character, as Elon Musk did, involves an investment, that is an offering to that idol.
Ooh, the courts, now I'm really scared. Ever notice how no one ever actually sues over such alleged slander? Its called discovery, they won't sue for that one simple reason. Who knows what she's on, like the man who appointed her, she's a Zionist stooge, that much is for certain.So share with us the evidence that makes this an "educated" guess. BTW I don't think the courts make a distinction between "slander" and "guess".
There is such a thing known as discernment. If a person publicly makes an offering to an idol and worships it we do not have to be ignorant, we can discern that they are an idol worshipper of that idol.Hmm .. what happened to judge not?
Just curious. Are Israeli war crimes included in your statement? Should not we be prosecuting those crimes as well?There is such a thing known as discernment. If a person publicly makes an offering to an idol and worships it we do not have to be ignorant, we can discern that they are an idol worshipper of that idol.
The Bible does not say "judge not", that does not take in the full context. Because the same place it says "judge not" it says "with what judgment you judge you shall be judged" and it says "don't cast your pearls before swine" and that does not refer to people throwing jewelry into a pigpen.
I take issue with unsubstantiated claims. I do not have an issue with someone saying that Trump is a convicted Felon, that is a fact. but I do take issue with someone accusing another person of taking adrenochrome without giving us the evidence of that. Even if you have evidence, if they have not been convicted it is still an allegation. To not have any evidence is slander.
If you have evidence of a crime you are to prosecute the person, to cover it up or ignore it is not acceptable. If however, the person is found innocent it doesn't mean the allegation was slander.
Yes, all crimes are included. We are currently in the fog of war. However, just like the Nuremberg trials after WW2 I expect that everyone will have to appear before the judge to be judged for the things they have done. That would include both Hamas and the IDF. Both Palestinians and Israelis. We all will have to give an account for the things we have done.Just curious. Are Israeli war crimes included in your statement? Should not we be prosecuting those crimes as well?
Because, unlike my adrenochrome speculation, there can be no doubt that we are witnessing multiple war crimes here.
Everyone will give an account, except the victors of course. Dresden was a war crime, and most have never heard of it.Yes, all crimes are included. We are currently in the fog of war. However, just like the Nuremberg trials after WW2 I expect that everyone will have to appear before the judge to be judged for the things they have done. That would include both Hamas and the IDF. Both Palestinians and Israelis. We all will have to give an account for the things we have done.
Everyone will give an account, except the victors of course. Dresden was a war crime, and most have never heard of it.
Are you sure this is correct? It makes it appear that the people involved in ethnic cleansing are the Moslems and not the Jews, but all the protestors are saying the opposite. If you are correct it means that we have a whole lot more useful idiots than anyone could have imagined, even on this forum we have a few useful idiots.
The Jews have desired to ethnically cleanse the entire middle east since their founding. This is beyond dispute. We are watching it unfold in real time.fyi..
Everyone who has studied history during the 20th century has heard of Dresden. And everyone, including the ones you call "victors" will have to stand before the judgement seat to give account of what they have done in this life.Everyone will give an account, except the victors of course. Dresden was a war crime, and most have never heard of it.