he doesn't the will of man is the ancestry of the will of flesh
How can you remove the will of flesh from the will of man ?
You can't he puts the will of the flesh first
Free will verses permissive will
- Thread starter Jordon
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
How can you remove the will of flesh from the will of man ?
You can't he puts the will of the flesh first
John didn’t write anything that supports your assertion. In other words, you are adding to the text.
Again.
see here you again. If your so sure of yourself
Why even ask why the sentences are split up.
Why is it you only see your ideas as valid ?
I affirm the valid ideas of others more than challenging or disagreeing with invalid ideas.
Unfortunately, many of yours happen to be invalid.
...
This was your answer to what i asked.
Are you going to answer what you meant or play another game ?
.
Where Scripture is clear, and Scripture is the basis of the argument, one need not restate it.
John clearly distinguishes the will of the flesh from the will of man. You apparently conflate them.
apparently,
well at least that's not an absolute then on this occasion, I mean oooo i guess I should be grateful for that one sir.At least I have a little bit of your compassion now,
I'll try my best to stay on your good side, but I can't promise you anything.
You have a tendency to fly of the handle.
But you still haven't answered how can the man's will of the flesh be removed from man, but anyway thanks for your tiny winy bit of compassion sir.
ok well I'll ask you the same a question again then maybe this could persuade you to answer
So John 1 states the word was with God and the word was God
So surly the will of the flesh is the will of man then ?
If you can make a direct logical connection between those two statements, there might be a reasonable answer.
I don’t think you can. It’s a non sequitur.
nouns dont just go in one direction sir, because it was coming from a good logical premise.
You know you just can't get through to free will by yourself sir you need to Have God discipline your will.
it's madness I'm not getting an answer to this.
It would be lovely if your statements were something other than incoherent.
To what, exactly?
incoherent ? Why
What did you find incoherent ?
John 1 was based on freedom.
A noun is also an idea sir like the idea of the word freedom.
So the word became flesh to give us freedom, overcome the will of the flesh