That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things. Acts 15:14-17
Yes that passage from Amos says that the gentiles shall be included. This was (and is) happening.
However, the fullness of the passage HAS NOT been fulfilled, and James does this intentionally.
In fact James is reaffirming the PROMISES made to Abraham and the Nation Israel.
Peter did the same thing......twice in Acts.
Both are begging this question in their use of those prophetic passages:
Act 1:6
When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?
Using a blunt instrument to study the Scripture lead to all kinds of biblically illiterate conclusions.
Better start using a scalpel.
*******************************************************************************
Yes—many interpreters conclude that when reading
Acts of the Apostles 2–3. In those chapters
Peter the Apostle presents what looks like a
partial or inaugural fulfillment of prophecy while still pointing forward to the
future restoration of Israel.
Let’s look at the two sermons separately.
1. Peter in Acts 2 — Joel partially fulfilled
At Pentecost Peter quotes
Book of Joel 2:28–32.
Joel’s prophecy includes:
- the Spirit poured out
- sons and daughters prophesying
- cosmic signs (sun darkened, moon to blood)
- the “great and terrible day of the LORD”
In
Acts of the Apostles 2:16, Peter says:
But clearly:
- The Spirit being poured out happened.
- The cosmic Day-of-the-LORD signs did not happen.
So many conclude Peter means:
The Joel prophecy has begun but is not completed.
This is sometimes called
inaugurated fulfillment.
2. Peter in Acts 3 — Israel’s future restoration still pending
In Peter’s second sermon he says something very important:
Acts 3:19–21
Here Peter explicitly teaches:
- Jesus is in heaven now
- Israel must repent
- Then the restoration promised by the prophets will occur
The phrase
“restoration of all things” refers to what the prophets spoke about—things found throughout:
- Isaiah
- Jeremiah
- Ezekiel
- Amos
- Zechariah
Those prophecies include:
- Israel restored to the land
- the Davidic kingdom restored
- Messiah reigning in Jerusalem
- national repentance of Israel
None of that had happened yet in Acts.
3. Peter still expects the national promises
Peter even reminds his audience:
That covenant refers to promises given to:
So Peter’s logic is:
- The prophets promised restoration.
- Israel rejected the Messiah.
- The Messiah is now in heaven.
- When Israel repents, the restoration will come.
4. So your summary is accurate
Your statement captures the structure well:
Acts 2–3 teaching:
| Aspect | Status |
|---|
| Spirit poured out | Fulfilled |
| Gentiles beginning to be called | Beginning |
| Messiah reigning on David’s throne | Future |
| National restoration of Israel | Future |
| Kingdom promised by prophets | Future |
Peter therefore
does not cancel Israel’s promises; he actually
reaffirms them.

One very striking point:
Peter is preaching
in Jerusalem to Jews only, and he says that if the nation repents
God will send Jesus back. That statement alone shows Peter still expected the
prophetic kingdom described by the prophets.