You replied but you didn’t answer my question. Now you’re asking me to prove Paul told Gentiles not to keep the Sabbath, but the apostles never commanded Gentile believers to keep it in the first place. Why would Paul tell them to stop doing something they were never instructed to do?
If Christians must keep the Sabbath because it’s one of the commandments, then shouldn’t we also keep the rest of the Sabbath law that goes with it, like the sacrifices in Numbers 28:9–10 or the penalties in Exodus 31:14–17? The apostles addressed what Gentile believers must keep in Acts 15 and never required Sabbath observance.
Paul also wrote that believers should not be judged regarding Sabbaths.
“Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath. These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.”
Colossians 2:16-17 ESV
He also taught that observing particular days is a matter of personal conviction, not a requirement.
“One person esteems one day as better than another, while another esteems all days alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind.”
Romans 14:5 ESV
They were Jews they all kept it there is scripture proving this. But before we look at the specific verses you quoted let us establish the most important principle of this entire discussion. When Jesus Himself spoke about the commandments and the Sabbath specifically He left absolutely no room for ambiguity:
Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets. I am not come to destroy but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you till heaven and earth pass away one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law till all be fulfilled. (Matthew 5:17-18)
And He declared Himself Lord of the Sabbath. Not abolisher of it. Not replacer of it. Lord of it:
And he said unto them the sabbath was made for man and not man for the sabbath. Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath. (Mark 2:27-28)
You cannot be Lord of something that no longer exists. That is the foundation everything else must be measured against.
Now let us address your specific points honestly.
On Acts 15 and the Jerusalem Council
You say the apostles never required Sabbath observance for Gentiles in Acts 15. That is true. But let us read what Acts 15 was actually about. The specific question before the council was whether Gentiles needed to be circumcised and follow the Mosaic ceremonial law for salvation. That was the debate. The council gave four specific requirements to avoid immediate stumbling blocks for new Gentile believers coming out of paganism. It was never intended to be an exhaustive list of every commandment a believer should keep for the rest of their lives. To argue that because the Sabbath was not mentioned in Acts 15 it is therefore abolished is like saying because Acts 15 did not mention murder it is now acceptable to murder.
Furthermore immediately after giving those four requirements James quoted the prophet Amos and then added something remarkable that is almost always overlooked:
For Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach him being read in the synagogues every sabbath day. (Acts 15:21)
James was saying the Gentile believers would hear Moses read every Sabbath in the synagogues and learn from there. The assumption built into Acts 15 itself is that Gentile believers would be in the synagogue on the Sabbath learning God's ways. That is the exact opposite of Sabbath abolishment.
On Colossians 2:16-17
This is perhaps the most commonly used verse to argue against Sabbath observance and it deserves very careful attention. Let us read it in the KJV:
Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink or in respect of an holyday or of the new moon or of the sabbath days which are a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ. (Colossians 2:16-17)
There are two critically important things to understand about this verse.
First the context. Paul is writing to believers in Colossae who were being pressured and judged by people pushing a specific false religious system involving asceticism, angel worship and man made regulations. (Colossians 2:18-23). He is telling them not to let these people judge them regarding their practice. He is not telling them to stop observing the Sabbath. He is telling them not to be condemned by legalistic outsiders regarding how they observe it.
Second and most importantly the phrase shadow of things to come refers specifically to the ceremonial sabbaths of the Mosaic calendar, the new moons, the annual feast sabbaths like Passover and the Day of Atonement, not the weekly seventh day Sabbath which was established at creation before any shadow or type existed. The weekly Sabbath was never a shadow pointing to Christ. It was established at creation as a permanent gift to humanity before sin ever entered the world. (Genesis 2:2-3).
The Sabbath that is a shadow in Colossians 2 refers to the ceremonial sabbaths of the annual feasts. The creation Sabbath stands in an entirely different category.
On Romans 14:5
One man esteemeth one day above another another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. (Romans 14:5)
Read the full context of Romans 14 carefully. Paul is addressing a specific dispute in the Roman church between Jewish believers who observed special fast days and dietary restrictions and Gentile believers who did not. The entire chapter is about not judging one another over personal convictions regarding food and special observance days within that specific cultural context. It is a pastoral letter addressing a local church conflict. It is not a doctrinal statement abolishing the fourth commandment.
Furthermore if Romans 14:5 truly means any day is as good as any other for worship then it equally abolishes Sunday worship since Sunday is also just one day among others by that same logic. Nobody argues that. Which reveals that this verse is not actually about abolishing any particular day of worship at all.
On the Sabbath sacrifices in Numbers 28:9-10
You ask whether we should also keep the Sabbath sacrifices if we keep the Sabbath commandment. This is a fair question and the answer lies in the distinction we have already established. The animal sacrifices were part of the ceremonial and Mosaic system that pointed forward to Christ and were completely fulfilled in His perfect and final sacrifice. They belong to the category of things that were shadows pointing to Him. The weekly Sabbath rest established at creation belongs to the category of the eternal moral law embedded in creation itself. These are two entirely different categories and conflating them creates unnecessary confusion.
The most important point of all
You began by saying the apostles never commanded Gentile believers to keep the Sabbath in the first place. But you are looking in the wrong place for the command. The command did not originate with the apostles. It originated with God at creation and was confirmed by Jesus Himself as Lord of the Sabbath. The question is not what the apostles commanded. The question is what God commanded and what Jesus confirmed.
And Jesus confirmed it with complete clarity:
The sabbath was made for man. (Mark 2:27)
Made for man. Not made for Jews. Not made for Israel. Made for man. At creation. Before any nation, any covenant or any apostolic letter ever existed.
And there is not a single verse in the entire New Testament where Jesus Himself says the Sabbath is abolished, moved to another day or made optional. Not one. The silence of Jesus on abolishing the Sabbath while speaking so clearly about its purpose and declaring Himself its Lord is itself one of the most powerful confirmations that it still stands exactly where God placed it from the very beginning.