NoDo you think the deep state operates only on one side of the aisle?
Just curious.
Sorry I must not have been clear. They control the majority on both sides and every conceivable way.
NoDo you think the deep state operates only on one side of the aisle?
Just curious.
No
Sorry I must not have been clear. They control the majority on both sides and every conceivable way.
I think what I find most astounding is how people cling to their delusions in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.
Should this come to pass, the certain demise of the once great USA draweth nigh...
Fox News was the example of the Republican media/information control arm.I thought so ... thanks for clarifying.
Thanks for your summary.There is a lot of information on this thread that is for sure.
So many reasons:
It is a war of choice, not a war of necessity, based on a false narrative
Potential for it expanding beyond the region or being another forever war
It is the tail wagging the dog..the dog in this case is the USA
Common folk will suffer, the ruling class are protected from the harm they inflict
This is an imperialist expansionist war.... huckeee told us it very clearly.
Should this come to pass, the certain demise of the once great USA draweth nigh...
Gas prices are rocketing and in the midterms we will see the democrats take both the house and the senate.
Yes, I agree.I think Charlie Kirk was very intelligent and very well informed, so his opinion is certainly of interest.
Prior to going to war I think it is beneficial for everyone to give their opinions on such an option. However, once the decision is made to go to war then I think it becomes contrary to the best interests of the country to keep debating it or speaking against it. Now if you want to quietly keep a close eye on what is going on, how the war is prosecuted, and any crimes against humanity that is a good thing.Yes, I agree.
That report was well explained by Harris in my previous post.
He based it upon the entire interview from the testimony of the actual Director of Counterteriorism. So, knowing you, you probably want to go to the source.
Prior to going to war I think it is beneficial for everyone to give their opinions on such an option. However, once the decision is made to go to war then I think it becomes contrary to the best interests of the country to keep debating it or speaking against it. Now if you want to quietly keep a close eye on what is going on, how the war is prosecuted, and any crimes against humanity that is a good thing.
Likewise if you want to campaign against anyone in the upcoming election based on the war, that is also a good way to address this.
But what @ChristRoseFromTheDead and what @HeIsHere are doing are not beneficial to anyone. If they feel strongly, write a book and when the war is over publish it.
For some reason many Americans never learned that "freedom of speech" includes freedom to keep your mouth shut. As for Canadians, they don't have freedom of speech. I still remember the trucker rally in Canada. No one cares what she thinks at this point, now that the decision is made. Perhaps a poll of Canadians prior to the decision would have been important, but now the country has no choice but to finish this in the best way possible.
Looks like he drew his line around Kharg Island.We have to withdraw from this war. A United States president cannot, under no circumstances, accept that another country goes wild in a war like operation.
Mr president, you have to draw a line here!
Looks like he drew his line around Kharg Island.
I don't see how my comments to several individuals would be equated with a campaign.Likewise if you want to campaign against anyone in the upcoming election based on the war, that is also a good way to address this.
But what @ChristRoseFromTheDead and what @HeIsHere are doing are not beneficial to anyone. If they feel strongly, write a book and when the war is over publish it.
For some reason many Americans never learned that "freedom of speech" includes freedom to keep your mouth shut. As for Canadians, they don't have freedom of speech. I still remember the trucker rally in Canada. No one cares what she thinks at this point, now that the decision is made. Perhaps a poll of Canadians prior to the decision would have been important, but now the country has no choice but to finish this in the best way possible.
Qatar has faced long-standing accusations of supporting terrorism, with reports indicating that individuals and entities within the country have provided financial support to groups like Al-Qaeda and its affiliates, as well as maintaining ties to Hamas and the Taliban. While Qatar denies these charges and works with the U.S. against terrorism, critics argue that their efforts against financing have been insufficient.This is what will stop the war. Pressure on the US by the world to do so. The guy in the picture with the flag behind him looks like a KKK member lol
View attachment 286801
View attachment 286802
View attachment 286804