I haven't heard about this "unconditional, everlasting covenant with the Jews". If that's true, then the Bible is not true. The truth is that the Church has replaced the Jews as "Gods chosen people".
There are many different Christian Denominations with radically different interpretations of the book of revelation.Wow, where are you getting these bogus "stories". There is absolutely no Biblical basis to say this.
The Biblical basis on which people have inferred a temple is that the oblations and sacrifices will be restarted. The only thing they needed to do that was a priesthood and the ashes of the red heifer. They have both now.
Also, we are told that in the middle of the tribulation Antichrist will put the abomination of desolation (this term is translated from a Hebrew phrase which could also be translated as "winged idol") into the "temple" (the word translated temple does not mean a large building but rather the "holy sanctuary" which was in both the tabernacle and temple). They have already made this idol, it is called "Savior of the World" it is 10 cubits high, the same height as the two cherubim in the Holy Sanctuary, and it has the face of King Charles.
PRINCE CHARLES BECOMES THE ANGEL OF THE AMAZON
HELLO! brings you the latest celebrity & royal news from the UK & around the world, magazine exclusives, fashion, beauty, lifestyle news, celeb babies, weddings, pregnancies and more!www.hellomagazine.com
Israel exists for a vital function. It is another proof of the reality of God, His ability to do as He says and the reliability of the Bible as the Word of God. The third temple will be built. Most Jews still do not accept Jesus as Messiah, although there is a revival happening in Israel right now.
No, I mean where do you get this story about the tabernacle of David? There is nothing in the Bible that would suggest that. The Tabernacle was in the time of Samuel, the ark that David took up to Jerusalem was returned to Israel while Samuel was alive. It is completely absurd to think that the tabernacle was somehow destroyed during Samuel's life. David described the ark dwelling in a tent, and not a tent that he made, it would have certainly been the same tabernacle that was at the time of Samuel.
Well, the way I see it, Antiochus IV was the type that the end time son of perdition anti-type will emulate.Wow, where are you getting these bogus "stories". There is absolutely no Biblical basis to say this.
The Biblical basis on which people have inferred a temple is that the oblations and sacrifices will be restarted. The only thing they needed to do that was a priesthood and the ashes of the red heifer. They have both now.
Also, we are told that in the middle of the tribulation Antichrist will put the abomination of desolation (this term is translated from a Hebrew phrase which could also be translated as "winged idol") into the "temple" (the word translated temple does not mean a large building but rather the "holy sanctuary" which was in both the tabernacle and temple). They have already made this idol, it is called "Savior of the World" it is 10 cubits high, the same height as the two cherubim in the Holy Sanctuary, and it has the face of King Charles.
PRINCE CHARLES BECOMES THE ANGEL OF THE AMAZON
HELLO! brings you the latest celebrity & royal news from the UK & around the world, magazine exclusives, fashion, beauty, lifestyle news, celeb babies, weddings, pregnancies and more!
Not symbolic language—this is the actual sacred complex.
These Daniel passages strongly anchor the prophecy in a Temple setting. Together: a specific, consecrated physical المكان (place) The Temple precinct in Jerusalem Paul says this figure sits in it — implying: No sacrifices = no abomination event All three converge on the same idea:
No temple on Earth can be "holy" ever again.
Oh really LOL!
These matters go right to the backbone of OT theology: which covenants are explicitly called everlasting and unconditional, especially those tied to land, throne, and national identity.
This is a unilateral grant covenant: Meaning: Many see this as: Cosmic guarantee = absolute permanence Another perpetual office-based covenant Still:| Covenant | Recipient | What is guaranteed | Everlasting language | Unconditional? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abrahamic | Abraham & seed | Land, nation, blessing | Yes (berit olam) | Yes |
| Davidic | David | Throne/kingship | Yes (ad olam) | Yes |
| New Covenant | Israel (and wider application) | Spiritual renewal + restoration | Yes | Yes |
| Land (Deut 30) | Israel | Regathering to land | Implied | Yes (based on Abrahamic) |
| Phinehas | Priestly line | Priesthood | Yes | Yes |
| Noahic | All humanity | Earth stability | Yes | Yes |
It creates a layered structure of irreversible divine commitments:
These matters go right to the backbone of OT theology: which covenants are explicitly called everlasting and unconditional, especially those tied to land, throne, and national identity.
Below is a clear, text-based breakdown with the key Hebrew terms and passages.
1. The Abrahamic Covenant — Everlasting land + nation
Core passages
- Genesis 12:1–3
- Genesis 15:18–21
- Genesis 17:7–8
Key statement
Hebrew terms:
- “berit olam” (בְּרִית עוֹלָם) = everlasting covenant
- “achuzzat olam” (אֲחֻזַּת עוֹלָם) = everlasting possession (land)
Why it’s unconditional
- In Genesis 15, only God (symbolized by fire) passes between the pieces.
- Abraham does not pass through → no bilateral obligation.
- Land
- Seed (nation)
- Blessing
2. The Davidic Covenant — Everlasting throne/kingship
Core passages
- 2 Samuel 7:12–16
- Psalm 89:3–4, 34–37
- Psalm 132:11–12
Key statement
Hebrew terms:
- “ad olam” (עַד־עוֹלָם) = forever
- “olam” repeatedly applied to throne and dynasty
Unconditional nature (with discipline clause)
- Psalm 89 is decisive:
- Kings may be judged
- Covenant itself cannot be annulled
3. The Land Covenant (Deuteronomic expansion)
Often treated as an extension of Abrahamic promises.
Key passage
- Deuteronomy 30:1–10
Key idea
- Even after exile:
Nature
- Not called explicitly “everlasting” in the same formula as Genesis 17,
- Guarantees final restoration to the land
- Based on prior unconditional oath to Abraham
- The operational outworking of the Abrahamic land promise
4. The New Covenant — Everlasting spiritual + national restoration
Core passages
- Jeremiah 31:31–37
- Ezekiel 36:24–28
- Ezekiel 37:26–28
Key statement
Hebrew:
- berit olam again
Why it’s unconditional
- God says repeatedly: “I will…”
- New heart
- Indwelling Spirit
- National regathering
- Permanent relationship
Permanence clause (very strong)
Jeremiah 31:
5. The Priesthood Covenant (Phinehas)
Often overlooked but explicitly everlasting.
Key passage
- Numbers 25:10–13
Key statement
Hebrew:
- “berit kehunnat olam” = everlasting priesthood covenant
Nature
- Granted to Phinehas
- Zealous act
- Line of Aaron
6. The Noahic Covenant — Everlasting stability of the earth
Key passage
- Genesis 9:8–17
Key statement
Scope
- Not Israel-specific
- No global flood again
- Stability of creation order
- Explicitly unconditional and everlasting
7. Summary Table
Covenant Recipient What is guaranteed Everlasting language Unconditional? Abrahamic Abraham & seed Land, nation, blessing Yes (berit olam) Yes Davidic David Throne/kingship Yes (ad olam) Yes New Covenant Israel (and wider application) Spiritual renewal + restoration Yes Yes Land (Deut 30) Israel Regathering to land Implied Yes (based on Abrahamic) Phinehas Priestly line Priesthood Yes Yes Noahic All humanity Earth stability Yes Yes
8. Big-picture synthesis
These covenants form a coherent framework:
- Abrahamic → Who owns the land
- Davidic → Who rules the kingdom
- New Covenant → How the people are transformed
- Priestly (Phinehas) → Who mediates worship
- Noahic → Why history continues at all
Final observation
The repeated use of “olam” (everlasting) across multiple independent covenants is not accidental.
- Land (geographical)
- Throne (political)
- People (spiritual)
- Worship (priestly)
Yes, so a sacred temple setting where the priesthood can restart the oblations and sacrifices, all those requirements have been fulfilled. The only way they could have sacrificed a red heifer according to the Torah is if those requirements have been fulfilled.Well, the way I see it, Antiochus IV was the type that the end time son of perdition anti-type will emulate.
Furthermore, in Matt 24, Jesus is speaking to Jews just outside the Temple precinct. There is no doubt that He is describing what they are just then looking at and commenting on!
And BOTH the Greek and Hebrew terms match perfectly. A particular building (Temple) in a particular location (Jerusalem).
This idea that the old Tabernacle of David in Hebron is correct is seriously flawed.
Tabernacle of David (Amos)
Hebrew: sukkah = temporary shelter
Connotation: dynasty / kingdom / restoration
********************************************************************
If we focus carefully on the language (Hebrew + Greek) and the specific passages, the case that the abomination of desolation occurs in a literal, physical Temple in Jerusalem rests heavily on how “holy place” is used.
1. Daniel: the original prophecy (Hebrew)
Daniel 9:27
- Written in Hebrew (with some Aramaic sections nearby).
- Key idea: sacrifices stop → requires a functioning Temple system.
- Implication: altar + priesthood + location = Temple in Jerusalem.
Daniel 11:31
- Hebrew phrase: “miqdash” (מִקְדָּשׁ) = sanctuary, holy place.
- This word is consistently used for:
- The Tabernacle (Exodus)
- The Temple in Jerusalem
Daniel 12:11
Again:
- Requires daily sacrifice
- Requires designated sacred location
