More signs of a prolonged war.
Well, Moses, who happened to know bible doctrine. Knew exactly why Israel is here and knew the eternal/unconditional contract that God made with Israel.
Unfortunately, many believers today will say, "Burn ,baby burn!" Thank God Israel had Moses. Seems the majority of believers today want God to break His contract........with a little bit of glee it seems.
9 Then the LORD said to Moses, “I have seen this people, and behold, they are an obstinate people. 10 So now leave Me alone, that My anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them; and I will make of you a great nation.”
11 Then Moses pleaded with the LORD his God, and said, “LORD, why does Your anger burn against Your people whom You have brought out from the land of Egypt with great power and with a mighty hand? 12 Why should the Egyptians talk, saying, ‘With evil motives He brought them out, to kill them on the mountains and to destroy them from the face of the earth’? Turn from Your burning anger and relent of doing harm to Your people. 13 Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, Your servants to whom You swore by Yourself, and said to them, ‘I will multiply your descendants as the stars of the heavens, and all this land of which I have spoken I will give to your descendants, and they shall inherit it forever.’” 14 So the LORD relented of the harm which He said He would do to His people.
Well, Moses, who happened to know bible doctrine. Knew exactly why Israel is here and knew the eternal/unconditional contract that God made with Israel.
More signs of a prolonged war.
With all due respect, I must reject your views and believe what my Minister teaches instead.With all due respect, I must reject your views and believe what my Minister teaches instead.
He taught us that, "Every date-setter in history has been wrong. Such predictions bring disrepute to the Gospel and cause unnecessary trauma when the date passes".
"I believe in the literal, personal return of Jesus Christ. However, because Jesus specifically said no man knows the day or hour, (a day can mean a year in the bible), I must reject all date-setting as unbiblical. I will remain faithful in my calling, by living each day ready for His appearance, rather than chasing predictions".
Date setting for the return of Jesus Christ, is a violation of clear biblical teaching and an exercise in arrogance. My Minister teaches, the sovereignty of God, the authority of Scripture, and the necessity of constant readiness rather than calculation.
Matthew 24:36 "But concerning that day or that hour, no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only." Anyone claiming to know the date is claiming to know something that Jesus said even He did not know in His humiliation.
Acts 1:7 When the disciples asked about the time, Jesus replied, "It is not for you to know times or seasons which the Father has put in His own authority".
1 Thessalonians 5:2 The "day of the Lord so comes as a thief in the night." This implies it will be unexpected, unannounced, and sudden, not a predicted date"
Christ could return at any moment. Setting a date (e.g., "September 2026") destroys this imminence because it wrongly suggests Christ cannot come before that date.
"The Bible tells me to look for Christ, not a calendar. Any date set is a contradiction to the doctrine of imminence".
"Jesus tells us to 'watch' (Mark 13:37) because we do not know the time, not to search for clues to build a timeline. My duty is to be doing the work of the Great Commission, not mapping the end times".
This is a brazen assertion that openly defies Scripture. You would be accusing Jesus Himself of being a "date-setter" and "date-chaser".With all due respect, I must reject your views and believe what my Minister teaches instead.
He taught us that, "Every date-setter in history has been wrong. Such predictions bring disrepute to the Gospel and cause unnecessary trauma when the date passes".
Infantile ignorant fussy squalling does not in any way constitute itself as sound mature Biblically supported truth.God made promises to the faithful in Israel, ie, the believing remnant. That is all.
Tragic. The IRGC nutters had better face reality and come to terms.
Infantile ignorant fussy squalling does not in any way constitute itself as sound mature Biblically supported truth.
Neither does the abject and intentional promoting of heresies. That is outright defiance of Biblical truth.
Rom 11:25
For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
Rom 11:28
As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching ***the election***, they are beloved (still beloved!) for the fathers' sakes.
Rom 11:29
For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
Paul wrote the Epistle to the Romans around AD 56–57 (most likely during the winter of 56/57), while he was in Corinth, Greece.
Right. God still loved the Jews then, the same way that Jesus loves His brethren the Jews today.
And yes, He WILL redeem them in the near future, as He is the Kinsman Redeemer of Israel.
I have done the investigation and calculations myself (several times), and have concluded that May 14, 1948 and June 7, 1967 do in fact fall prophetically and mathematically in accord with earlier dates that God intentionally (INTENTIONALLY!) marked for reference.
Is the Church an enemy of the Gospel? Is the Church in partial blindness until the fullness of the gentiles have come in?The only interpretation that makes sense to me is, that "Israel" is the "Church".
Is the Church an enemy of the Gospel? Is the Church in partial blindness until the fullness of the gentiles have come in?
Paul is wrong and you are right. Is that what you are trying to say?The election are the believing remnant, not all natural Israel. The believing part of Israel that is not hardened are beloved and to them the gifts and calling are without repentance. You are merely spouting the doctrine of the pharisees that rewards unbelief and rebellion.
Much of their families are already here and in Europe.
As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father's sakes.