My point was that in Romans 11:27 it talks about taking away their sins, and then in the next verse it says they are enemies, so isn't that the same group of people?
Can you walk thru these verses in a similar way you did to verse 28, I may be able to understand what you mean. Romans 11:7 clarifies your view.
Rom 11:27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away
their sins.
Rom 11:28 As concerning the gospel,
they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election,
they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
Rom 11:29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
Rom 11:30 For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief:
Rom 11:31 Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy.
Rom 11:32 For God hath concluded
them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.
Rom 11:26 - And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
Rom 11:27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
Will this superb exegetical treatment be enough to silence the replacement theology crew once and for all?
It certainly should. But it won't.
In Romans 11:27, Paul is quoting a composite of Old Testament prophecy (primarily Isaiah 59:21 and Isaiah 27:9). To determine if this refers to a future reality, we have to look at the Greek verbal aspect and the specific construction of the sentence.
The Greek text for the clause "when I shall take away their sins" is:
ὅταν ἀφέλωμαι τὰς ἁμαρτίας αὐτῶν
Here is the breakdown of why the grammar points toward a future prophetic fulfillment:
1. The Use of "Hotan" (ὅταν) with the Subjunctive
The word translated as "when" is ὅταν (hotan). In Greek grammar, hotan combined with a subjunctive verb (in this case, aphelōmai) creates a Future Contingent Clause.
Unlike the word hote (which refers to a specific time in the past or present), hotan introduces an event that is expected to happen in the future but is contingent upon certain conditions being met.
In the context of Romans 11, that condition is the "coming of the Deliverer out of Zion" mentioned in the previous verse.
2. The Aorist Subjunctive (aphelōmai)
The verb ἀφέλωμαι (aphelōmai) is the Aorist Middle Subjunctive of aphaireō.
The Aorist Aspect: While the Aorist often denotes past tense in the indicative mood, in the subjunctive mood, it refers to a "summary" action that has not yet occurred. It views the "taking away of sins" as a complete, definitive event that will take place at a point in the future.
The "Shall" Factor: In English, "shall" is a helper verb used to denote the future tense. In the Greek of this passage, the future reality is baked into the Subjunctive Mood. It isn't describing something Paul believes has already been fully realized for the nation of Israel at the time of his writing; it is describing a promise yet to be consummated.
3. The Future Indicative Context
Greek sentences don't exist in a vacuum. Paul anchors this "covenant" in the preceding verse (Romans\ 11:26):
"And so all Israel shall be saved (sōthēsetai)..."
The verb σωθήσεται (sōthēsetai) is Future Passive Indicative. This is a hard future tense. Because verse 27 is the explanation of the covenant that enables verse 26, the "taking away of sins" must logically align with the future salvation of "all Israel" mentioned moments prior.
4. The Prophetic "Goal"
The term for "take away" (aphaireō) specifically means to remove or cut off.
In the Septuagint (the Greek OT), this language is used in prophetic contexts regarding the Day of the Lord and the final cleansing of the NATION.
Paul’s use of the Middle Voice (aphelōmai) suggests that God is acting "for Himself" or "on His own initiative" to fulfill this promise, reinforcing the idea of a divinely appointed future milestone rather than a gradual historical process.