2026 Canada Bill C-22 is a lawful-access infrastructure bill that could become a surveillance-by-design regime, depending heavily on regulations, ministerial orders, and how the systemic-vulnerability protection is interpreted.Even the biggest Christian skeptic of us being in the end days can no longer hold out that we aren’t.
You’d have to be willfully ignorant to not see the near completion of the Antichrist system achieved.
5 G towers every couple of miles, data centers popping up everywhere, surveillance cameras watching us all day long, our phones listening to us all day long. NONE of this is for us to have faster internet!!
I heard an astonishing fact the other day.
The military sub department D.A.R.P.A., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA, ran a covert operation called Lifelog
LifeLog was a project of the Information Processing Techniques Office of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency(DARPA) of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). According to its bid solicitation pamphlet in 2003, it was to be "an ontology-based (sub)system that captures, stores, and makes accessible the flow of one person's experience in and interactions with the world in order to support a broad spectrum of associates/assistants and other system capabilities". The objective of the LifeLog concept was "to be able to trace the 'threads' of an individual's life in terms of events, states, and relationships", and it has the ability to "take in all of a subject's experience, from phone numbers dialed and e-mail messages viewed to every breath taken, step made and place gone".
The insanely interesting thing is that it was forced to close over obvious privacy concerns, and outrage by oversight civil liberty watchdog groups, on February 4th 2004.
Guess what ubiquitous Social Media entity started on February 4th 2004?
Yep. Facebook! On that exact date that the secret government program ended to collect everyone’s personal information continuously.
Now, we give our information VOLUNTARILY, and you better believe the government collects that data from these “ private” companies. They almost certainly were the progenitors for Mr Zuckerberg.
So all of this coincides with “As in the days of Noah”
Next post will be more about the genetic engineering going on as it did in Noah’s time.
Critics are correct that the bill could create a very serious surveillance architecture. The most troubling parts are:
- metadata retention for up to one year,
- mandatory technical access capability,
- ministerial orders against providers,
- uncertainty over who becomes a core provider,
- possible conflict with end-to-end encryption and no-logs VPNs,
- secrecy and limited public visibility,
- the risk that “authorized access” becomes permanent infrastructure.
So yes, calling it a surveillance bill is not hysterical. It is a fair description of the risk. The more precise phrase would be: