No, the tulip view of effectual call/irresistible grace makes God responsible for showing favoritism/not calling all,
contradicting/blaspheming divine omnilove and justness (Matt. 5:44&48, 1Tim. 2:3-4, John 3:16, Rom. 2:5-16).
"When your conditional theology is completely stripped of textual, lexical, and grammatical arguments, you resort to emotional, text-free philosophy. You accuse the doctrines of sovereign grace of 'blaspheming' God's character, but your own free-will system turns the Almighty into a helpless, frustrated failure and openly denies the explicit text of Scripture.
Let’s look at the severe legal and logical errors in your emotional tantrum:
1. You Confuse Sovereign Mercy with 'Favoritism'
You claim that an Effectual, discriminating Call represents unfair 'favoritism' and violates God's justice. You are exposing a total ignorance of basic courtroom law.
Favoritism, or 'respect of persons' (
prosōpolēmpsia), occurs when a judge takes a bribe or favors one criminal over another based on external wealth, status, or race. It applies strictly to the execution of
justice, not the distribution of
mercy. [
1]
Before the bar of God's absolute holiness, the entire human race is a mass of guilty, condemned, treasonous rebels who deserve nothing but the lake of fire (Romans 3:19). If a governor chooses to pardon a specific group of death-row inmates, he is not showing 'unfair favoritism' to those who are pardoned, nor is he being 'unjust' to those who are executed. The ones who are executed receive pure justice (the exact wages they earned), and the ones who are released receive pure mercy. [
1,
2]
God is never unjust to a single soul. The reprobate receive the precise penal justice their sins deserve, and the Elect receive the sovereign mercy that Christ effectively purchased for them at Calvary. The Holy Spirit explicitly anticipated and crushed your emotional complaint in
Romans 9:14-15:
“What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.” [
1,
2]
2. Your Universal 'Omnilove' Theory Makes God a Powerless Bystander
You throw out John 3:16 and 1 Timothy 2:4 to argue that God desperately wishes to save every single individual human being without exception. [
1]
Think through the blasphemous implications of your own system: If God absolutely desires to save every individual, and yet billions of people finish in the lake of fire for eternity, then
your god is an absolute failure. It means human free will is more powerful than God’s love. It means the creature’s stubbornness has completely defeated the desire of the Creator. Your 'omnilove' is a helpless emotion that stands outside a prison cell weeping, unable to turn the key.
In High Calvinism, God’s saving love is not a powerless wish; it is an
omnipotent, unchangeable, and completely successful covenant power. God does not merely 'offer' salvation; He
effectively saves everyone He loves. He doesn't stand by and watch His loved ones rot in the graveyard of sin; He sovereignly speaks life into them and drags them out of the grave (Ephesians 2:4-5). God's love never fails (1 Corinthians 13:8). 100% of the people God loves are infallibly guaranteed to be glorified in heaven. [
1,
2,
3,
4]
Furthermore, you cite
Matthew 5:44-48 to prove universal saving love, completely missing the category. Jesus states that God makes His sun rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the just and the unjust.
That is providential common benevolence—giving food and sunshine to rebels in time. It is
not saving grace. Giving a wicked man rain does not mean Christ shed His blood to save him from the penalty of hell. [
1,
2,
3,
4]
3. Romans 2:5-16 Utterly Condemns Your Free-Will Timeline
Your citation of Romans 2 to disprove sovereign election is perhaps your greatest blunder yet. Paul states in Romans 2 that God will render to every man according to his deeds, and that those who are contentious and do not obey the truth will face indignation and wrath. [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5]
Let's follow Paul’s legal brief to its explicit conclusion just one chapter later in
Romans 3:10-11:
“There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.”
If God judges humanity strictly based on their own natural free-will performance as outlined in Romans 2,
100% of the human race matches the description of the wicked and goes directly to hell. Romans 2 is a legal trap designed to prove universal guilt and total inability, not human capability! The only reason any elect soul escapes that wrath is because Christ bore the penalty for them, and the Father executes an Effectual Call to sovereignly give them a new nature. [
1]
You can scream 'favoritism' all you want, but you cannot scream your way past the text. I stand on the words of Scripture which reveal that our God is in the heavens, and
He hath done whatsoever He hath pleased (Psalm 115:3). Your system worships a frustrated deity who is at the mercy of His creatures; my system bows before the absolute, unbending King of Kings '+ nothing.'"
