If I didn't know better, I might think that AI has learned the art of gaslighting... I'll pay much closer attention from here on out! 
The Jesus of Calvinism seems to be a master thespian knocking on doors he never intends to enter into. He will short of it in spite of His declaration, "Behold! I stand at the door and knock... (no need to behold the entirety of this declaration)"
That both encourages and terrifies me at the same time!God is making you say that by decree!
.......
It seems that God is stirring something up in me, a sort of spark of ignition that will prove to be unquenchable. He is always "right there" with me, down to the split second, and though I've always kept Him close in my thoughts (even if at first appearance it might not seem so), I'm becoming more aware of that, and He's been making it so that I'm surer and surer, and surer, of that.That both encourages and terrifies me at the same time!
Matt 1:21 is not about Jews it's the ChurchAre you a Jew?
She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.”Matthew 1:21
That was as much Mary needed to know at that time.
Tulip is the Gospel!Just when you thought it was safe to participate in a thread.
What is a them gospel?
Calvinism is not the gospel but I understand it is your gospel because you think you are special. Every time you post on here I think I get a whiff of something burning.
You are scoffing the Gospel not goodCalvin would frown on such behavior. I see him asking 'does anyone have matches?'
You obviously do not see the contradiction in what you say. Be careful or other indoctrinates may disown you, clever as you believe yourself to be.
Rid yourself of the tulip pretzel mold and accept the plain meaning of John 3:3-21: God loves everyone in the world and whosoever believes in Jesus as Messiah is reborn spiritually/receives the HS and will be resurrected to heaven. 1Tim. 2:3-4 means the same; "all" means "world".
The god of "unconditional election for salvation" while others are left with no ability to respond positively in this new covenant does not exist.
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance" (KJV).
Full Stop.
I never suggested that Mary was evil. The Bible reveals that she was a sinner like the rest of us. Sinners can do evil deeds, but it's nonsense to suggest that a person is evil. Evil doesn't exist until it's committed, it doesn't have a life of it's own and it's not a person or entity.So then in your view Mary was evil, okay.
I see more clearly each day why this doctrine is labelled with the "h" label.
I've noticed there to be a few here who speak for others,as if there is a group of like minded opponents to the golden chain of Salvation in scripture.I am always dumbfounded by those who hold to the view of free will, who think they can just erase obvious verses that state otherwise and have been well argued, from their minds. Rather than providing a meaningful defense of their erroneous view - they do the most heinous thing by pitting one verse of God's Word against another verse in God's Word.
Those who hold to Free Grace, acknowledge all of Scripture and give explanation to those difficult verses, that on the surface, may seem contradictory to other verses. Contradiction lies not in the mind of God but in the mind of man.
Here are a few quotes from others. Perhaps you might ponder them. Probably not but perhaps.
So you believe you have free will? Then do not sin in thought, feeling, or deed. -- Martin Luther.
A man's free will cannot cure him of a toothache, or a sore finger;
and yet he madly thinks it is in its power to cure his soul. -- Augustus Toplady.
We do not choose God; God chooses us. Left to ourselves we would never choose Him. Our natural inclination is to run from God, not to seek Him. -- R.C. Sproul
Free Will vs. Free Grace - a poem
Free-will is a traitor to Jesus, my Lord;
Rebels at His sovereignty, counsel, and word;
Defying His power with impious strain,
And cries, "I'll not have this Jesus to reign."
Free-will is a liar, says "tis with ease;
A man can believe and repent when he please.
That he's a free agent, and so may refuse:
The good or the evil, whichever he choose."
Free-will is an imposter and cheat at the best,
To offer salvation he never possessed;
If certain conditions I only fulfill,
Yet gives me no power to do nor to will.
Free-will as a tyrant once ruled over me;
But Jesus o'ercame him and now I am free;
Made willing to own Him my King from that hour,
I bow to His scepter and yield to His power.
************************************************************
Free-grace is a scheme which Jehovah began,
In covenant counsel He drew up the plan;
The mighty Redeemer accomplished the whole,
And the Spirit imparted its joys in my soul.
Free-grace is distinguishing, sovereign to choose,
What objects to favor and whom to refuse;
His purpose must stand who is God ever blest,
The election obtained it, and blind are the rest.
Free-grace is the theme of the glorified throng,
While ages eternal are rolling along;
All glory and honor ascribe they to Him,
Who liveth and reigneth the only Supreme.
Free-grace long has been my soul's triumph and joy;
And while in the body, shall be my employ;
And when my glad spirit to God shall ascend,
Free-grace is the song that shall never have end. -- Cornelius Slim
So, I take it you resent the fact that God is sovereign over every aspect of His creation. You obviously reject the Bible doctrines of "election and predestination", because they seem unfair in your eyes.Actually it is NOT an honest invitation in your doctrine, you just say that but it is not, along with the fact this is once again eisegesis.
You project YOUR emotional attachment to the tulip pretzel, because your rant did not refute the truth of what I posted:
Tulip teaches God is NOT gracious, omniloving and just, but rather that God does NOT love the world, does NOT want everyone to be saved, and DOES show favoritism, contradicting GW in John 3:16, 1Tim. 2:3-4 and Rom. 2:11.
Thus, it is anti-Gospel heresy; believe at your own risk (Gal. 1:6-9)!
That Jacob being chosen has nothing to do with salvation, Jacob was chosen to be the one who receives the blessing of the firstborn despite being the younger.
A fine example of the pompous and self righteous supporter of false doctrine as ever there was. You are the one that is derelict in both understanding, according to the biblical definition, and may totally be missing discernment, both as a spiritual gift and as learned in life in generality.
God does not fit the human definition of understanding and He does not insult unless a person believes themself to be superior to Him because of their lack of belief in how He has revealed Himself in scripture.
I am left with the following as spoken by the true prophet of God Isaiah
“For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways,”
declares the Lord.
“As the heavens are higher than the earth,
so are my ways higher than your ways
and my thoughts than your thoughts.
That sums up most of the blather in this thread.
The Holy Spirit does not convict the world of sin, the world hates God and loves sin. So how can the Holy Spirit be convicting the world of something it loves.The Holy Spirit convicts the world of sin. That's alot of trouble to go to if God is going to just decide for people who will accept His offer of salvation or not.
That's the fine print that Calvinists seem to ignore. Along with everything else that plainly shows that God does not put His Spirit in anyone without them first accepting Christ.
I've noticed there to be a few here who speak for others,as if there is a group of like minded opponents to the golden chain of Salvation in scripture.
A collective of Gospel opponents.
"For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son... And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified."
Really, does it require debate at this point?
Those who deny the Gospel already will not be moved by arguing the Gospel is true.
And if you consider 1Corinthians 2:14, it becomes obvious we are witnessing that passage being reiterated by people like mem, pinebeach,and others.
What are we arguing for?
When God calls whom he will,and no one can come to Jesus unless this occurs first, and we know this, because it is what God says,what do we have to prove to those who don't believe it? Even when it is in writing in his own inspired work.
Those opponents are actually showing they have the nerve to say publicly , God didn't mean what he said. And Jesus didn't really die so to guarantee his plan.
Keeping this thread alive just allows heresy and blasphemers to have a platform as unbelievers.
Making baseless allegations, only serves to expose your ignorance. If you find something that I believe to be unbiblical, then please bring it to my attention.Oh I don't know. What about the people who stand at the edge of the world and tell those approaching to be careful and not
fall off the edge?
ALL YOUR WORKS ARE SINFUL!!! READ THE BIBLE. NOTHING WE DO EARNS OR KEEPS SALVATION. I would think you as the good Calvinist you are would know that.
This is the thing. Calvinists constantly trip themselves up and make obvious the heretical and just plain wrong interpretations and machinations they are famous for.
If "He does not enter unbelievers", then nobody is saved, because we're all born as unbelievers.Meaning, that we cannot save ourselves which is God had to solve that problem.
but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Rom. 5:8
The Holy Spirit will draw people to God and convict of sin. He does not enter unbelievers.
You are so hung up on this "tulip pretzel", you can't see the forest for the tree. Forget about "TULIP" and concentrate on the Scriptures that formed the TULIP acronym. TULIP is not a doctrine. It is a simple acronym to remind believers of these five steps which include man's condition and God's application of salvation.
Likewise, you are so hung up on "Total Depravity". If you don't like the word "total", then don't pay any attention to it. Personally, I don't like the term "total" because I think it creates misunderstanding in todays language. People think you are saying, a person is incapable of doing anything "good". Man, in his fallen state, can do many things that might be considered "good" by other men.
However, what he can't do in this flesh - is please God. Man can only please God in spirit, through the agency of the Spirit. Do you deny, that the Scriptures teach that our spirit became as dead in the fall? Scripture clearly says that I was "dead" in trespasses and sins. Well I am obviously not "dead" physically - for I still breath and move. So dead in what way? Dead spiritually. We lost communion with God, who is spirit. Therefore, after the fall, all of mankind became spiritually dead and our nature marred horribly. Dead... unable to do anything or understand anything in a spiritual way of pleasing God. Depravity, as John Calvin outlined it, included this reality. Don't make more of it than it truly is. In the age that John Calvin discussed these things, "depravity" meant a loss of something. To be depraved - is to be missing something. When one says "total depravity", it means to have lost something totally. In our modern age, depravity takes on a more "moral" meaning. Morality was not the subject.