The rapture is the groom gathering his bride.N
No sir, definitely not the harpazo. Obviously.
The parable is the groom gathering his bride.
Hard to wiggle out of it.
The question is why do you need it changed.
There is some reason.
The rapture is the groom gathering his bride.N
No sir, definitely not the harpazo. Obviously.
Here let me help you.....The rapture is the groom gathering his bride.
The parable is the groom gathering his bride.
Hard to wiggle out of it.
The question is why do you need it changed.
There is some reason.
Again, my objection is that theologians assume the Olivet Discourse addresses a single event rather than two.N
No sir, definitely not the harpazo. Obviously.
Good verses.Here let me help you.....
[Luk 12:36 KJV] 36 And ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their lord, when he will return from the wedding; that when he cometh and knocketh, they may open unto him immediately.
[Rev 19:9 KJV] 9 And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed [are] they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith unto me, These are the true sayings of God.
No rapture verse is postrib setting.Again, my objection is that theologians assume the Olivet Discourse addresses a single event rather than two.
The Olivet Discourse does not address a single event; it unfolds across two prophetic horizons. Jesus speaks first about the Jewish–Roman wars and the destruction of Jerusalem (Matt 24:1–22), and then He shifts to the Day of the Lord, the final revealing of the Son of Man (Matt 24:23–31). Luke makes this distinction explicit by calling the latter moment “the revealing of the Son of God” (Luke 17:30). The vulture‑and‑corpse metaphor belongs to this second horizon. It is not a picture of Roman legions surrounding Jerusalem; it is Jesus’ symbolic way of describing the unmistakable, global visibility of His return. Just as vultures gathering around a corpse is an obvious, public sign, so the coming of the Son of Man will be a universally recognizable event. Nothing about this imagery fits the localized, terrestrial events of AD 70 — but it fits perfectly with the cosmic unveiling Jesus describes in the second half of the discourse.
When Jesus speaks of the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven and gathering His elect (Matt 24:30–31), He is describing the same event Paul calls the Lord’s descent and the catching‑up of believers (1 Thess 4:16–17). During this moment, those living in Jerusalem — and across the world — will witness the visible arrival of Christ, while His followers are summoned to meet Him in the air. This did not occur during the Jewish–Roman wars. No one saw the Son of Man revealed in glory, no angels gathered the elect, and no believers were caught up to meet Christ. The vulture metaphor, therefore, cannot be reduced to a symbol of Roman judgment. It belongs to the eschatological horizon, the Day of the Lord, when Christ’s return will be as unmistakable as vultures circling above a carcass. In this context, the metaphor reinforces the clarity and undeniability of the Second Coming — the very moment when the rapture takes place.
Paul describes the rapture in 1Thessalonians chapter 4.No rapture verse is postrib setting.
Noah gathered pretrib
Lot gathered pretrib
The baby Jesus gathered pretrib to Egypt.
All rapture verses are pretrib setting.
The Tribulation began at the Stoning of Stephan and ended in 1948.You have not, and can not produce a postrib rapture verse.
Yes. Though many don't recognize it.You say Matthew 24 has a gathering postrib?
You must be a post-tribber. Tragically.Again, my objection is that theologians assume the Olivet Discourse addresses a single event rather than two.
The Olivet Discourse does not address a single event; it unfolds across two prophetic horizons. Jesus speaks first about the Jewish–Roman wars and the destruction of Jerusalem (Matt 24:1–22), and then He shifts to the Day of the Lord, the final revealing of the Son of Man (Matt 24:23–31). Luke makes this distinction explicit by calling the latter moment “the revealing of the Son of God” (Luke 17:30). The vulture‑and‑corpse metaphor belongs to this second horizon. It is not a picture of Roman legions surrounding Jerusalem; it is Jesus’ symbolic way of describing the unmistakable, global visibility of His return. Just as vultures gathering around a corpse is an obvious, public sign, so the coming of the Son of Man will be a universally recognizable event. Nothing about this imagery fits the localized, terrestrial events of AD 70 — but it fits perfectly with the cosmic unveiling Jesus describes in the second half of the discourse.
When Jesus speaks of the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven and gathering His elect (Matt 24:30–31), He is describing the same event Paul calls the Lord’s descent and the catching‑up of believers (1 Thess 4:16–17). During this moment, those living in Jerusalem — and across the world — will witness the visible arrival of Christ, while His followers are summoned to meet Him in the air. This did not occur during the Jewish–Roman wars. No one saw the Son of Man revealed in glory, no angels gathered the elect, and no believers were caught up to meet Christ. The vulture metaphor, therefore, cannot be reduced to a symbol of Roman judgment. It belongs to the eschatological horizon, the Day of the Lord, when Christ’s return will be as unmistakable as vultures circling above a carcass. In this context, the metaphor reinforces the clarity and undeniability of the Second Coming — the very moment when the rapture takes place.
Most Christians who talk about the Great Tribulation assume it refers to the future judgments of Revelation, especially the bowl judgments, but others see it as persecution, symbolic suffering, or the events of AD 70. The term is not used consistently across traditions, so clarity is essential.No rapture verse is postrib setting.
Noah gathered pretrib
Lot gathered pretrib
The baby Jesus gathered pretrib to Egypt.
All rapture verses are pretrib setting.
You have not, and can not produce a postrib rapture verse.
You say Matthew 24 has a gathering postrib?
It sure does.
It SPECIFICALLY SAYS WORD FOR WORD, ANGELS GATHER IN HEAVEN.
That CANNOT BE THE RAPTURE.
The rapture is the GROOM GATHERING FROM EARTH.
You never noticed it?
JESUS SENDS IN.... HEAVEN.
The rapture is "Jesus goes and gathers", ....NOT," Jesus stays and sends angels to gather "
Why do postribs, not read that verse, and quote it as written????
And claim it as their only verse?
Biblically illiterate nonsense. Effortlessly debunked.Most Christians who talk about the Great Tribulation assume it refers to the future judgments of Revelation, especially the bowl judgments, but others see it as persecution, symbolic suffering, or the events of AD 70. The term is not used consistently across traditions, so clarity is essential.
My view of the Great Tribulation is not based on a prophetic system but on what Jesus actually said. If I have misunderstood Him, then I am wrong. But according to the Olivet Discourse, Jesus Himself gives the starting point of the timeline: the destruction of the temple (Matt 24:2), which occurred in AD 70. From that terminus, Jesus describes a long period of tribulation that unfolds across history, not a compressed 3½‑year window. And He is explicit about what comes immediately after this Great Tribulation: cosmic signs in the heavens and the visible appearing of the Son of Man, when His people will see Him coming on the clouds. That sequence has not yet happened. Therefore, the Great Tribulation cannot be limited to a short, future period; it is the extended age of suffering and upheaval that began with Jerusalem’s fall and will only conclude when Christ returns in glory.
This reading honors Jesus’ own chronology. He ties the beginning of the tribulation to a historical event we can date — the fall of the temple — and ties the end of the tribulation to an event that has not yet occurred — His visible return. The length of the Great Tribulation, therefore, is determined by Jesus’ timeline, not by later prophetic models.
I’m not trying to wear a label like “post‑trib.” My view is simply based on what Jesus said in the Olivet Discourse. He taught that the Great Tribulation isn’t finished until the celestial signs appear — the darkened sun, the falling stars, and the visible appearing of the Son of Man. Since those events haven’t happened yet, the Great Tribulation cannot be limited to a 3½‑year period. It began with the destruction of the temple in AD 70, and according to Jesus’ own sequence, it continues until He returns. If I’ve misunderstood His timeline, then I’m wrong — but I’m just trying to follow the order He gave.You must be a post-tribber. Tragically.
When people reduce a complex passage like the Olivet Discourse to short dismissals, it usually means they’re defending a system rather than listening to Jesus’ timeline. I’m not claiming to be right because of a label or a tradition. My view is simply based on what Jesus said: the Great Tribulation isn’t finished until the celestial signs appear and the Son of Man is seen coming on the clouds. Since those events haven’t happened yet, the tribulation cannot be limited to a short 3½‑year period. If I’ve misunderstood Jesus, then I’m wrong — but I’m at least trying to follow His sequence rather than a slogan.Biblically illiterate nonsense. Effortlessly debunked.
Friend, I know Matt 24 like the back of my hand. And I am a rapture expert of the first order.When people reduce a complex passage like the Olivet Discourse to short dismissals, it usually means they’re defending a system rather than listening to Jesus’ timeline. I’m not claiming to be right because of a label or a tradition. My view is simply based on what Jesus said: the Great Tribulation isn’t finished until the celestial signs appear and the Son of Man is seen coming on the clouds. Since those events haven’t happened yet, the tribulation cannot be limited to a short 3½‑year period. If I’ve misunderstood Jesus, then I’m wrong — but I’m at least trying to follow His sequence rather than a slogan.
Apparently, you want to keep your reasoning a secret.Friend, I know Matt 24 like the back of my hand. And I am a rapture expert of the first order.
Somebody is confused and it ain't me....![]()
I have 30,366 posts of file here.Apparently, you want to keep your reasoning a secret.
Apparently, you want to keep your reasoning a secret.
That is a lot of posts. So what is one more? What is so difficult about explaining the reasons you believe what you believe?I have 30,366 posts of file here.
I invite you to read them.
Feel free to use the search tool.
NopeMost Christians who talk about the Great Tribulation assume it refers to the future judgments of Revelation, especially the bowl judgments, but others see it as persecution, symbolic suffering, or the events of AD 70. The term is not used consistently across traditions, so clarity is essential.
My view of the Great Tribulation is not based on a prophetic system but on what Jesus actually said. If I have misunderstood Him, then I am wrong. But according to the Olivet Discourse, Jesus Himself gives the starting point of the timeline: the destruction of the temple (Matt 24:2), which occurred in AD 70. From that terminus, Jesus describes a long period of tribulation that unfolds across history, not a compressed 3½‑year window. And He is explicit about what comes immediately after this Great Tribulation: cosmic signs in the heavens and the visible appearing of the Son of Man, when His people will see Him coming on the clouds. That sequence has not yet happened. Therefore, the Great Tribulation cannot be limited to a short, future period; it is the extended age of suffering and upheaval that began with Jerusalem’s fall and will only conclude when Christ returns in glory.
This reading honors Jesus’ own chronology. He ties the beginning of the tribulation to a historical event we can date — the fall of the temple — and ties the end of the tribulation to an event that has not yet occurred — His visible return. The length of the Great Tribulation, therefore, is determined by Jesus’ timeline, not by later prophetic models.
The final week of the 70 weeks is FOR THE JEWS. Daniel 9:24. Specifically, it pertains to Daniel's people and the Holy City of Jerusalem. It was fulfilled when Jesus went to the cross (Week 69 1/2) and ended at the Stoning of Stephen. The GT began then when Herod crucified James and imprisoned Peter. And Paul found the Jews to be unworthy of the Gospel. Acts 13:46 after the temple was destroyed by the Roman armies, the Jews were/are under tribulation until now.Nope
Daniel 9 puts the trib at 7 years.
IN THE MIDDLE of the 7 years is the AOD.
The trib is future.
No preterism.