OSAS origins and comparison

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
God did not deal with mankind the same way in the OT as He does in the NT. The covenants changed. The blood changed. The Spirit changed. The relationship changed. The access changed. The regeneration changed. The indwelling changed. The placement into Christ changed.
And any system — Calvinist, Arminian, Catholic, Reformed — that tries to flatten those distinctions is not defending Scripture.
It’s defending itself.

OMC, to address your point about the covenants: there are indeed distinctions in Scripture, but we must not confuse external administrations with the reality of salvation. God gave a physical covenant for the land to Abram to be realized by his physical seed through Moses; but He gave a second covenant of eternal promise to Abraham, to be realized solely by a Savior by grace to his spiritual seed.
Those who were saved in the Old Testament were saved in exactly the same way as those in the New Testament. God has provided only one way of salvation regardless of timing, and that is entirely through Jesus Christ, the Savior. The reason why the word and title of "the Savior" is singular, because there is only one Savior, Jesus Christ, therefore, everyone saved must be saved through Him alone.
Since I have just shared my final closing thoughts on this thread with Dave, I am content to leave the argument there and let the scriptures stand on their own. I wish you the best also
 
OMC, to address your point about the covenants: there are indeed distinctions in Scripture, but we must not confuse external administrations with the reality of salvation. God gave a physical covenant for the land to Abram to be realized by his physical seed through Moses; but He gave a second covenant of eternal promise to Abraham, to be realized solely by a Savior by grace to his spiritual seed.
Those who were saved in the Old Testament were saved in exactly the same way as those in the New Testament. God has provided only one way of salvation regardless of timing, and that is entirely through Jesus Christ, the Savior. The reason why the word and title of "the Savior" is singular, because there is only one Savior, Jesus Christ, therefore, everyone saved must be saved through Him alone.
Since I have just shared my final closing thoughts on this thread with Dave, I am content to leave the argument there and let the scriptures stand on their own. I wish you the best also
Brother, I appreciate the spirit of your closing thoughts, and I agree with you on the most important truth: there is only one Savior, and every person who has ever been saved is saved through Him alone. That is non‑negotiable. There is no second Christ, no alternate mediator, no parallel path. Salvation has always been by grace, always through faith, and always grounded in the person and work of Jesus Christ — whether anticipated in promise or received in fulfillment.

But here is the distinction Scripture itself forces us to maintain: the way God administers salvation changes across covenants, even though the source of salvation never does.

Yes — Abraham was justified by faith.
Yes — David was forgiven by grace.
Yes — OT saints trusted in the promise of the coming Redeemer.
But they did not experience:
the indwelling Spirit (John 7:39)
the new birth (Romans 8:9–11)
union with Christ (Ephesians 1:13–14)
the sealing of the Spirit (Ephesians 1:13)
the baptism into the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12:13)
These realities simply did not exist until Christ died, rose, ascended, and sent the Spirit.
So yes — salvation is always through Christ. But no — the OT believer was not “alive in Christ,” not “indwelt,” not “born again,” and not “in the New Covenant.” They were saved by faith in the promise, but the life itself — the indwelling Spirit — was not yet given.

This is not dispensationalism versus covenant theology.
This is John 7:39 versus theological systems.
This is Hebrews 8:7–13 versus flattening covenants.
This is Romans 8:9 versus retroactive regeneration.

You’re right that covenant theology often collapses distinctions to protect its system, and you’re right that dispensationalism often exaggerates distinctions to protect its own. But the biblical middle is simple:

One Savior
.One source of salvation.
Two covenants.
Two administrations.
Two spiritual conditions.


OT saints were saved by Christ,but they were not yet in Christ.

NT saints are saved by Christ,and they are in Christ because the Spirit now indwells.

That’s the difference. That’s the harmony. That’s the Scripture.

And brother, I respect your decision to leave the argument where it stands. The Word does not need us to force it — it speaks clearly enough for those willing to hear it.

If you ever want to revisit any part of this, I’ll be here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dkontner
Brother, I appreciate the spirit of your closing thoughts, and I agree with you on the most important truth: there is only one Savior, and every person who has ever been saved is saved through Him alone. That is non‑negotiable. There is no second Christ, no alternate mediator, no parallel path. Salvation has always been by grace, always through faith, and always grounded in the person and work of Jesus Christ — whether anticipated in promise or received in fulfillment.

But here is the distinction Scripture itself forces us to maintain: the way God administers salvation changes across covenants, even though the source of salvation never does.

Yes — Abraham was justified by faith.
Yes — David was forgiven by grace.
Yes — OT saints trusted in the promise of the coming Redeemer.
But they did not experience:
the indwelling Spirit (John 7:39)
the new birth (Romans 8:9–11)
union with Christ (Ephesians 1:13–14)
the sealing of the Spirit (Ephesians 1:13)
the baptism into the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12:13)
These realities simply did not exist until Christ died, rose, ascended, and sent the Spirit.
So yes — salvation is always through Christ. But no — the OT believer was not “alive in Christ,” not “indwelt,” not “born again,” and not “in the New Covenant.” They were saved by faith in the promise, but the life itself — the indwelling Spirit — was not yet given.

This is not dispensationalism versus covenant theology.
This is John 7:39 versus theological systems.
This is Hebrews 8:7–13 versus flattening covenants.
This is Romans 8:9 versus retroactive regeneration.

You’re right that covenant theology often collapses distinctions to protect its system, and you’re right that dispensationalism often exaggerates distinctions to protect its own. But the biblical middle is simple:

One Savior
.One source of salvation.
Two covenants.
Two administrations.
Two spiritual conditions.


OT saints were saved by Christ,but they were not yet in Christ.

NT saints are saved by Christ,and they are in Christ because the Spirit now indwells.

That’s the difference. That’s the harmony. That’s the Scripture.

And brother, I respect your decision to leave the argument where it stands. The Word does not need us to force it — it speaks clearly enough for those willing to hear it.

If you ever want to revisit any part of this, I’ll be here.
How were old testament believers saved? Or were they saved?

When did believing on the Lord Jesus Christ start saving people?
 
How were old testament believers saved? Or were they saved?
Old Testament believers were saved — but not in the same experience or administration as New Testament believers. They were saved by faith in the promise of the coming Redeemer, not by regeneration, indwelling, or union with Christ, because none of those realities existed yet. Hebrews says the first covenant was “faulty” and “obsolete,” and Jesus Himself says in John 7:39 that “the Spirit was not yet given.” That means OT saints trusted God’s promise and were counted righteous (like Abraham in Genesis 15:6), but they were still dead in Adam, not alive in Christ, because the blood had not been shed and the Spirit had not been poured out. Salvation has always been through Christ alone — one Savior, one sacrifice — but the life, the indwelling, the new birth, and the placement into Christ only became possible after the death, resurrection, and ascension. So yes, they were saved — but not born again, not indwelt, and not in Christ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm

Ephesians 4​

7 But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ.
8 Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.
9 (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?
 
Old Testament believers were saved — but not in the same experience or administration as New Testament believers. They were saved by faith in the promise of the coming Redeemer, not by regeneration, indwelling, or union with Christ, because none of those realities existed yet. Hebrews says the first covenant was “faulty” and “obsolete,” and Jesus Himself says in John 7:39 that “the Spirit was not yet given.” That means OT saints trusted God’s promise and were counted righteous (like Abraham in Genesis 15:6), but they were still dead in Adam, not alive in Christ, because the blood had not been shed and the Spirit had not been poured out. Salvation has always been through Christ alone — one Savior, one sacrifice — but the life, the indwelling, the new birth, and the placement into Christ only became possible after the death, resurrection, and ascension. So yes, they were saved — but not born again, not indwelt, and not in Christ.
Did they belong to Christ?

At what point in history did believing in the Messiah lead to salvation?
 
When did believing on the Lord Jesus Christ start saving people
Believing on the Lord Jesus Christ began saving people the moment the death, resurrection, and ascension were completed — and not one second earlier.
Before that moment, people could believe the promise of the coming Messiah, but they could not believe on the risen Lord Jesus Christ, because:
He had not yet died
He had not yet risen
He had not yet ascended
The Spirit had not yet been given
The New Covenant had not yet been inaugurated
Everything hinges on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Believing on the Lord Jesus Christ began saving people the moment the death, resurrection, and ascension were completed — and not one second earlier.
Before that moment, people could believe the promise of the coming Messiah, but they could not believe on the risen Lord Jesus Christ, because:
He had not yet died
He had not yet risen
He had not yet ascended
The Spirit had not yet been given
The New Covenant had not yet been inaugurated
Everything hinges on that.
So they are saved. Do they belong to Christ?
 
So they are saved. Do they belong to Christ?
Old Testament believers were saved, but they did not belong to Christ in the New Testament sense, because belonging to Christ requires indwelling, new birth, and union with Christ — and Jesus Himself says in John 7:39 that “the Spirit was not yet given.” They were saved by faith in the promise of the coming Redeemer, but they were still in Adam, not in Christ, because the blood had not yet been shed and the Spirit had not yet been poured out. Paul makes it airtight in Romans 8:9: “If anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is none of His.” OT saints did not have the Spirit of Christ indwelling them, therefore they were not yet His possession in the covenantal, union‑with‑Christ sense. They were saved toward Christ, but they did not yet belong to Christ until the death, resurrection, ascension, and Pentecost made union with Him possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Old Testament believers were saved, but they did not belong to Christ in the New Testament sense, because belonging to Christ requires indwelling, new birth, and union with Christ — and Jesus Himself says in John 7:39 that “the Spirit was not yet given.” They were saved by faith in the promise of the coming Redeemer, but they were still in Adam, not in Christ, because the blood had not yet been shed and the Spirit had not yet been poured out. Paul makes it airtight in Romans 8:9: “If anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is none of His.” OT saints did not have the Spirit of Christ indwelling them, therefore they were not yet His possession in the covenantal, union‑with‑Christ sense. They were saved toward Christ, but they did not yet belong to Christ until the death, resurrection, ascension, and Pentecost made union with Him possible.
Was Abraham in the kingdom of God?

What does John 8:56 mean?
 
Was Abraham in the kingdom of God?

What does John 8:56 mean?
Abraham was saved, justified by faith, and counted righteous — but he was not in the kingdom of God in the New‑Covenant sense, because Jesus teaches that entrance into the kingdom requires new birth (John 3:3–5), and the new birth requires the indwelling Spirit, which “was not yet given” (John 7:39). Abraham believed the promise, but he did not yet possess the life, the indwelling, or the union with Christ that define kingdom membership after Pentecost. He will be in the kingdom in resurrection glory, but he was not in the kingdom during his earthly life, because the kingdom in its spiritual, regenerative form did not yet exist. In short: Abraham was saved toward the kingdom, but not yet in the kingdom.
When Jesus says, “Abraham rejoiced to see My day; he saw it and was glad,” He means that Abraham, through revelation, understood that God’s covenant promise would be fulfilled in a future Redeemer — Christ Himself. Abraham didn’t see Jesus physically, nor did he experience New‑Covenant salvation; rather, he saw the promise of Christ’s day, the coming of the Messiah, the fulfillment of the covenant, and he believed it. Abraham saw the shadow, not the substance; the promise, not the Person; the future day, not the present reality. His joy was anticipatory, not experiential — because the actual “day” of Christ (incarnation, cross, resurrection, ascension, Spirit outpouring) had not yet occurred.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Abraham was saved, justified by faith, and counted righteous — but he was not in the kingdom of God in the New‑Covenant sense, because Jesus teaches that entrance into the kingdom requires new birth (John 3:3–5), and the new birth requires the indwelling Spirit, which “was not yet given” (John 7:39). Abraham believed the promise, but he did not yet possess the life, the indwelling, or the union with Christ that define kingdom membership after Pentecost. He will be in the kingdom in resurrection glory, but he was not in the kingdom during his earthly life, because the kingdom in its spiritual, regenerative form did not yet exist. In short: Abraham was saved toward the kingdom, but not yet in the kingdom.
When Jesus says, “Abraham rejoiced to see My day; he saw it and was glad,” He means that Abraham, through revelation, understood that God’s covenant promise would be fulfilled in a future Redeemer — Christ Himself. Abraham didn’t see Jesus physically, nor did he experience New‑Covenant salvation; rather, he saw the promise of Christ’s day, the coming of the Messiah, the fulfillment of the covenant, and he believed it. Abraham saw the shadow, not the substance; the promise, not the Person; the future day, not the present reality. His joy was anticipatory, not experiential — because the actual “day” of Christ (incarnation, cross, resurrection, ascension, Spirit outpouring) had not yet occurred.
While it can be argued that Abraham did see a pre-incarnate Christ, we'll set that aside. You offer alot of information without answering questions. Was Abraham in the kingdom of God or not?
 
John 8

51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.
52 Then said the Jews unto him, Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead, and the prophets; and thou sayest, If a man keep my saying, he shall never taste of death.
53 Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself?
54 Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God:
55 Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying.
56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.
57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?
58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rogerg
Up front, I confess that I am more Reformation-oriented in my soteriology than Arminian, though I am to a measure a Free Will advocate. That being said I am much more tolerant of free discourse between genuine Christian movements on this issue than many. It is an oddity of history that Predestination was largely viewed as the more orthodox view for many years, and Arminianism viewed with suspicion and at times as even a heresy.

But in places like the US, where Methodism has become prominent, the roles have reversed. Predestination, when coupled with Calvinism, is considered by some Methodists as heresy, while Arminianism is viewed as the prominent orthodox position. That being said, the truth needs to be told.

I'm a member of AoG and currently attend a Methodist church. Since I'm disallowed from discussing this elsewhere on this Forum, and people on the Forum continue to argue on this topic, I will confine my response here. And I will severely cut back my contributions on this Forum, since it is heavily censored on this matter, allowing for only one point of view. However, I've been told I am able to express ideas on this subject here, on the Unorthodox portion of the Forum, free of censorship.

OSAS is the Calvinist position expressed by some in more modern times. But the concept originates with early Predestination beliefs held by Augustine and the Reformers, though not necessarily expressed literally as "Once Saved Always Saved." Calvin went farther than some with his Double Predestination, as it was later called. TULIP came to present the 5 points of Calvinism, which included the Perseverance of the Saints, or one form of "Once Saved Always Saved."

Lutheranism and Calvinism were concerned to avoid the error of Pelagianism, the idea that we have within our nature the ability to independently produce righteousness and obtain Eternal Life. According to the Reformers we are predestined to Election by God, but once so Elected are free to make choices to exercise Faith and to Choose Salvation.

Methodism held to the idea that people have Prevenient Grace and are able to produce Faith by our own works with the caveat that Christ's redemption is essential to the formula. Some explain this as operating together with Christ synergistically.

A lot had to do with understanding the nature of Salvation itself in terms of Justification and Sanctification. Luther felt that a complete Conversion indicating one has true Faith and belongs to the Elect is at the heart of Salvation.

Arminius felt that conversion becomes real with Faith, and tends towards Perseverance, but nevertheless can be lost. Wesley believed the Arminian formula, but presented Instant Sanctification as a step beyond Nominal Christianity to indicate a more authentic Christian Conversion, or Rebirth.

Pentecostals saw Spirit Baptism as an important follow-up to Salvation, though like Methodist Sanctification seemed to confirm a real Conversion beyond Nominal Christianity. In reality, though, Nominal Christianity may represent a false Christianity, existing without a complete or true commitment to Christianity--less than a full Conversion.

So, all of these theological systems called for a step beyond the Nominal Church to provide real evidence of a true Conversion, or Rebirth. They are just called by different names, authenticating true Conversion, whether it is described as the experience of Faith for Election, Instant Sanctification, or Spirit Baptism.

And whether one can lose his Salvation or not may depend on whether the one exercising Christian gifts is representative of a true Christian Conversion or not. Jesus said that men would say, "Lord, Lord," when they are displaying gifts but not fully committed to Christ.

It is debatable, I suppose, whether someone who has the gifts of Christianity is really Christian when he turns away from Christianity permanently? That's the thing with OSAS--it doesn't seem to make much difference either way. If a Christian acts like a Christian and is not, or acts like a Christian and is, and turns completely away, the result is the same--the person who had acted Christian completely turns away. Paul and Peter both called for Christians, with gifts, to prove whether they are the Elect.

The big deal with Reformation Theology and Predestination is whether it is Fatalistic or has Free Will, in some measure? Regardless, all agree that whether Prevenient Grace or Faith by Election, nobody works righteousness acceptable to God for Salvation unless it is done with Christ's Atonement providing for it legally and spiritually. Even Predestinarians who are somewhat Fatalistic do allow for some measure of Free Will--just not Pelagianism.

Maturing in the Christian life has nothing to do with obtaining Salvation, which is what some call "Progressive Sanctification." We are actually Sanctified by the Work of Christ at Salvation, though the process of maturation continues progressively over time.
Being raised as a Baptist, I believed OSAS until I read Scriptures that teach the possibility of apostasy include the following:

Matt. 10:22, “All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.”
Rom. 11:22, “Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off.”
1Cor. 15:2, “By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain.”
Gal. 5:4, “You who are trying to be justified by law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace.”
Col. 1:22-23, “But now he has reconciled you by Christ’s physical body through death to present you holy in his sight, without blemish and free from accusation—if you continue in your faith, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel.”
2Thes. 1:4-5, “Therefore, among God’s churches we boast about your perseverance and faith in all the persecutions and trials you are enduring. All this is evidence that God’s judgment is right, and as a result you will be counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which you are suffering.”
2Tim. 2:12, “If we endure, we will also reign with him. If we disown him, he will also disown us;”
Heb. 3:6&14, “But Christ is faithful as a son over God’s house. And we are his house, if we hold on to our courage and the hope of which we boast… We have come to share in Christ if we hold firmly till the end the confidence we had at first.”
Heb. 6:4-6, “It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age, if they fall away, to be brought back to repentance, because to their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.” This passage indicates that apostasy may be viewed as total depravity or blasphemy against the HS (MT 12:31).
Heb. 10:26-36, “If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God… So do not throw away your confidence; it will be richly rewarded. You need to persevere so that when you have done the will of God, you will receive what he has promised.”
Jam. 1:12, “Blessed is the man who perseveres under trial, because when he has stood the test, he will receive the crown of life that God has promised to those who love him.”
2Pet. 1:10-11, “Therefore, my brothers, be all the more eager to make your calling and election sure. For if you do these things, you will never fall, and you will receive a rich welcome into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.”
2Pet. 2:20, “If they have escaped the corruption of the world by knowing our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and are again entangled in it and overcome, they are worse off at the end than they were at the beginning.”
1John 2:24-25, “See that what you have heard from the beginning remains in you. If it does, you also will remain in the Son and in the Father. And this is what he promised us—even eternal life.”
Jude 21, “Keep yourselves in God’s love as you wait for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ to bring you to eternal life.”
Rev. 2:10, “Do not be afraid of what you are about to suffer. I tell you, the devil will put some of you in prison to test you, and you will suffer persecution for ten days. Be faithful, even to the point of death, and I will give you the crown of life.”
📖
 
56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.
57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?
58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
Jesus is saying that Abraham, through divine revelation, saw the future arrival of the MessiahChrist’s day, not Christ’s earthly life.
He saw the promise, not the Person. He saw the day, not the details. He saw the shadow, not the substance.
And he rejoiced — because he understood that God’s covenant would be fulfilled in a future Redeemer.
The Jews misunderstand Jesus entirely. They assume He is claiming to have physically met Abraham.
Jesus is not claiming that. He is claiming something infinitely greater.
This is the nuclear core of the passage.
Jesus does not say:
“Before Abraham was, I existed.”
“Before Abraham was, I was created.”
“Before Abraham was, I came into being.”
He says: “I AM.”
This is the divine name from Exodus 3:14 — YHWH, the self‑existent One.
Jesus is claiming:
eternal existence
divine identity
pre‑existence before creation
equality with the Father
the name of God Himself
This is why the Jews immediately try to stone Him (v. 59). They understood exactly what He was claiming.
Abraham was saved, but he was not in the kingdom during his earthly life because the kingdom in its regenerative form did not yet exist. But Abraham did see — prophetically — the future day when the One who is I AM would come, die, rise, ascend, and pour out the Spirit. He saw the day of Christ. He did not experience the life of Christ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Where is the kingdom of God?

What does the kingdom of God consist in?
The kingdom of God is the present spiritual reign of God in those who have the Spirit, consisting in righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit — and it will later become a visible, physical kingdom when Christ returns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
The kingdom of God is the present spiritual reign of God in those who have the Spirit, consisting in righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit — and it will later become a visible, physical kingdom when Christ returns.
Right. The kingdom of God exists in believers...Luke 17:21. Abraham was a believer. The kingdom of God was in him. He could also see the kingdom of God even though his understanding was partial. John 3:3 says except one is born again, they cannot see the kingdom of God.

A mistake people make is that there are different salvations. There are not. Salvation has always been by grace through faith. God progressively made this known in the OT. Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord. Abraham heard the word of God and believed. That's no different than Ephesians 2:8-9 and Romans 10:17. And while the baptism with the Spirit that is from Jesus spoken of in Matthew 3:11 didn't manifest until Pentecost, all believers are indwelt by the Spirit. Otherwise, they don't belong to Christ, and cannot see the kingdom of God.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NightTwister
Being raised as a Baptist, I believed OSAS until I read Scriptures that teach the possibility of apostasy include the following:

Matt. 10:22, “All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.”
I believe in Free Will. I don't believe God predestined anybody to Hell, or the Lake of Fire. God determined the exact number of HIs elect from before the creation of the world. The number that extend beyond His Elect are the result of human sin.

Those who act in accordance with their natural desire to rebel against God can freely choose Christianity. And they do at times, receiving the corresponding benefits that God gives those who obey Him.

But when they fall back from their Christian obedience and determine to maintain independence from God, they show that they have not been produced as the Elect by God. They prove that human sin, acting in rebellion against God, produces like children who rebel against God's Word. They begin as Christians and end in a contradiction with that commitment.