1 Day Ago) Tyler Robinson , accused of the murder of Charlie Kirk, has second court hearing

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I think everyone on this forum has heard the case against Tyler Robinson from the Prosecutors perspective.

But all we have heard from concerning the case against it is a variety of slander against Candace Owens. Anyway, I don't think it is right to dismiss someone until we have given them a chance to speak.


How Is This Even Possible!?!?​


I think at the very least the prosecutor needs to address these issues.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: HeIsHere, Charlesiii and Bible_Locket
Oh,Candace Legion Owens,you are one depraved Hellbound Demon.

I hope your unrepentant sociopathic sins cost you $dearly in this life. Because come the next you'll be weeping and gnashing your teeth for eternity so to take it all back.
Your minions are pathetic.
 
I know that suing the security that was hired for negligence is not going to bring Charlie Kirk back.

When someone sues for negligence after their father passes away—legally known as a wrongful death lawsuit—it is rarely about replacing the person. Instead, families move forward with legal action for several deeply practical, financial, and emotional reasons: [1, 2, 3]

1. Covering Sudden Financial Devastation
When a parent dies unexpectedly, the family is often left with massive, immediate bills. A lawsuit helps recover these costs so the surviving family isn't financially ruined by someone else's mistake. This includes: [1, 2]
  • Medical expenses: The cost of hospital stays, emergency surgeries, and intensive care before the father passed away.
  • Funeral and burial costs: End-of-life arrangements are incredibly expensive.
  • Loss of income: If the father provided for his spouse, children, or household, his passing suddenly wipes out that financial security. A lawsuit can secure compensation for the future wages he would have earned. [1, 2, 3]

2. Accountability and Preventing Future Tragedies
Often, criminal courts cannot or will not file charges for accidents caused by negligence (like a poorly maintained building, nursing home neglect, or a corporate safety violation). A civil lawsuit forces the negligent party to face consequences. [1, 2, 3]
  • Corporate impact: For large companies or institutions, a major financial penalty is often the only thing that forces them to fix unsafe policies, fire dangerous employees, or recall bad products.
  • Protecting others: By suing, the family often hopes to ensure that the same negligent mistake doesn't happen to another family. [1, 2, 3]

3. Seeking a Sense of Justice and Closure
When someone dies due to natural causes, it is a tragedy. When they die because someone else was reckless or careless, it can leave the family with a burning sense of injustice. While it won't heal the grief, a successful lawsuit legally validates that what happened was wrong and holds the responsible party publicly accountable. [1, 2]

4. Compensation for "Non-Economic" Losses
The law recognizes that a father provides much more than just a paycheck. Children can sue for the loss of a father's companionship, guidance, parental support, and emotional relationship. While money is a poor substitute, it is the only mechanism the civil legal system has to acknowledge the immense scale of the loss. [1, 2, 3, 4]

I think the "accountability and preventing future tragedies" is incumbent upon anyone who has a conscience. This assassination of Charlie cannot go unpunished, otherwise what is to stop future assassinations? Everyone knows that in many cases when you assassinate someone who has a security team the easiest way is if you have bribed someone on the security team.

Also this tragedy didn't just impact the immediate family, there are many, many people who need a sense of justice and closure and many feel the security team did not do their job. At the very least they should be forced to defend themselves in a civil lawsuit. You can't simply "settle out of court" that won't give the hundreds of thousands of people concerned with this a sense of justice and closure.
 
JesusIsKing21 said:
R.I.P. Charlie. A Christian and a good father. I hope that Tyler Robinson gets life in prison and that he repents of his sin
Click to expand...
You do realise there is very little evidence that Tyler Robinson was even at the scene of the murder to fire a shot, right? Let alone that a .30-06 was even the murder weapon? I hope the real murderers do receive real justice, but the evidence is "overwhelming" that government agents and their contractors conspired to cover-up the real criminals - incompetence and negligence only stretch so far.

Proverbs 17:15 He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the Lord.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere and Churchgoer
Charlesiii said:
You do realise there is very little evidence that Tyler Robinson was even at the scene of the murder to fire a shot, right? Let alone that a .30-06 was even the murder weapon? I hope the real murderers do receive real justice, but the evidence is "overwhelming" that government agents and their contractors conspired to cover-up the real criminals - incompetence and negligence only stretch so far.

Proverbs 17:15 He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the Lord.
Click to expand...

Seems the grieving widow does not really know how to fake sorrow.
No sparklers this time. :rolleyes:
People are so gullible in this day and age.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlesiii and ZNP
Bible_Locket said:
He never imagined his haters would attack his widow and TPUSA if something did happen.

He would be so ashamed of the haters.
Click to expand...

Can you help me out because this post seems incredibly hypocritical, hopefully you can explain.

In the thread “Modern Relationships and Lindsey Clancy Case. 3 Children Strangled. Overwhelming Support From Females and Male Backlash.” You said Patrick Clancy might be a family annihilator (Post 306), I asked you why you would say that (Post 314). You never answered.

So why is it OK to make such an ugly allegation without any support and without providing any explanation, while at the same time no one is allowed to question TPUSA or Erika Kirk about questions they have relevant to Charlie Kirk's assassination?

(FYI: @Citizen, @NightTwister, @Lightbeamrider, @Churchgoer, @SomeDisciple, @PennEd, @pinebeach, @Adstar)
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere and Churchgoer
ZNP said:
Can you help me out because this post seems incredibly hypocritical, hopefully you can explain.

In the thread “Modern Relationships and Lindsey Clancy Case. 3 Children Strangled. Overwhelming Support From Females and Male Backlash.” You said Patrick Clancy might be a family annihilator (Post 306), I asked you why you would say that (Post 314). You never answered.

So why is it OK to make such an ugly allegation without any support and without providing any explanation, while at the same time no one is allowed to question TPUSA or Erika Kirk about questions they have relevant to Charlie Kirk's assassination?

(FYI: @Citizen, @NightTwister, @Lightbeamrider, @Churchgoer, @SomeDisciple, @PennEd, @pinebeach, @Adstar)
Click to expand...
in a public forum, we should all allow different opinions, no one has hard facts, or everyone has some hard facts.

Let's all have a civil discussion.

Note that the liberals use "hate" a lot. If you disagree with sex change, that's hate. Then Jesus also tells us to hate our family and love God. So "hate" can be a good word?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere and ZNP
ZNP said:
Can you help me out because this post seems incredibly hypocritical, hopefully you can explain.

In the thread “Modern Relationships and Lindsey Clancy Case. 3 Children Strangled. Overwhelming Support From Females and Male Backlash.” You said Patrick Clancy might be a family annihilator (Post 306), I asked you why you would say that (Post 314). You never answered.

So why is it OK to make such an ugly allegation without any support and without providing any explanation, while at the same time no one is allowed to question TPUSA or Erika Kirk about questions they have relevant to Charlie Kirk's assassination?

(FYI: @Citizen, @NightTwister, @Lightbeamrider, @Churchgoer, @SomeDisciple, @PennEd, @pinebeach, @Adstar)
Click to expand...
Not sure why I got dragged into this.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ThereRoseaLamb
Churchgoer said:
in a public forum, we should all allow different opinions, no one has hard facts, or everyone has some hard facts.

Let's all have a civil discussion.
Click to expand...
ZNP is civil.
Churchgoer said:
Note that the liberals use "hate" a lot. If you disagree with sex change, that's hate. Then Jesus also tells us to hate our family and love God. So "hate" can be a good word?
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Churchgoer
NightTwister said:
?
Click to expand...
They're making an effort to form a gang. A Legion.
They derailed this thread addressing the court case of Tyler Robinson so to inject slander and defamation screeds produced by one Candace Legion Owens.


They persisted in pushing her lies,despite the actual facts offered in court.

Now,they're calling you all in because they believe you are of that same mindset.i.e. trolling .
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThereRoseaLamb
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back