OMC, as usual, I am agreement with your heart if not your theology.Jesus’ command in Luke 12:33 to “sell your possessions and give to the poor” is not a universal rule that every Christian in every era must liquidate everything.
It is a heart‑diagnosis aimed at people whose security is tied to their stuff, and the proof is that the New Testament never treats this as a blanket command:
Zacchaeus gives half, not all; the early church shares freely but not by compulsion;
Paul assumes believers still own homes, tools, and resources; and Jesus Himself had disciples who kept their boats, houses, and livelihoods;
The point of Luke 12 is not “every Christian must sell everything,” but “every Christian must treat the kingdom as their treasure,” and for some people that will mean radical generosity, for others it means open‑handed stewardship, but for all it means refusing to let possessions become the place where the heart hides;
So the way to “manage the challenge” is not by fearing poverty but by letting Christ reorder your loves — give sacrificially, hold possessions loosely, help the poor intentionally, and live in such a way that your security comes from the Father who delights to give you the kingdom, not from the things you own.
By unilaterally declaring Jesus command to elevate the Kingdom over money is " Never treated like a "Universal Rule" is a dictate of wealthy people looking to protect their wealth.
This "modern" ...Jesus had no idea of a wealth society with enormous wealth compare to the world's poor. So we must interpret Jesus statements as only a product of His time and it's societies. That we can accept only as a general but highly symbolic statement.
What if you are wrong? What if Jesus was showing the heart of God for all time and places?
Hyperbole: Horror of horrors, what if Jesus was being "Literal?"