Nice!I'm ALMOST surprised that the unbelievers haven't told us that we're accusing God/Jesus of POLYGAMY!!!
But this is how it works:
The Two Wives Made One — A Deeper Reading
1. The Two Wives, Clearly Distinguished
The Bible sets up two distinct covenantal marriages from the very beginning:
The Father's Bride — Israel
The Son's Bride — the Church
- Hosea 2:19 — "I will betroth you to me forever; I will betroth you to me in righteousness and in justice, in steadfast love and in mercy."
- Isaiah 54:5 — "For your Maker is your husband— the LORD of hosts is his name, and the Holy One of Israel is he who is to be praised."
- Jeremiah 31:32 — "But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the LORD: I will put my law within them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people."
- Ezekiel 16:8 — "So I passed by you and looked upon you, behold, you were at the age for love. I spread the corner of my robe over you and covered your nakedness... and I betrothed you to myself and made a covenant with you, declares the Lord GOD, and you became mine."
Note the critical word in 2 Cor 11:2: "one husband." The Church is betrothed to a single bridegroom — the Son — not the Father. The Father's bride is Israel; the Son's bride is the Church. Two separate covenants, two separate marriages.
- Ephesians 5:25-27 — "Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her... that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish."
- 2 Corinthians 11:2 — "For I feel a divine jealousy for you, since I betrothed you to one husband, to present you as a pure virgin to Christ."
2. The "Barren" and the "Married" — Two Wives in One Prophecy
Isaiah 54:1-3 is the single most important passage for your point, and it's worth reading in full:
Read this carefully:
- The "desolate" / "barren" woman = Israel, temporarily set aside.
- The "married" woman = the Church, currently in her covenant-marriage with Christ.
- The prophecy says the barren woman will have more children than the married one — both will be fruitful.
- Then verse 5: "For your Maker is your husband" — the same God who is the Father's husband to Israel is speaking. He is not replacing one marriage with another. He is restoring the first and confirming the second.
- Verses 7-8: "with everlasting kindness I will have compassion on you... my covenant of peace shall not be removed."
Loss what?Yes, your lost your case. Nice try at bandaging up your shabby false doctrine.
And despite all of your continuous losses, you choose NOT to repent and receive the truth.
Sound familiar?
That's good but still avoids the origin of many doctrines held today
That is my belief also, although I think we are still a long way from it, but then again things can happen quickly just when you think all hope is lostNo, what it shows is that as we approach the end times, that we're being brought back to remembrance of the things that God/Jesus intended for us to know and understand.
Any time we see "dispensationalist" or "Darby" or "scofield" used to "prove" their case, it is best to skip whatever blather follows.The Rev Clarence Larkin, was an American Baptist pastor who lived from 1850 to 1924. His writings on dispensationalism had a great impact on Protestant churches in the 20th century, mainly because of his elaborate charts. A well known book of his is called "dispensational Truth" published in 1918, and it has been called the second bible of prophecy for Eschatology students.
Now bear in mind that this book and the elaborate charts within it, are about the futurist teaching of Revelation. And he made his money promoting the futurist viewpoint with his preachings and writings. Yet at the beginning of this book we have this confession:
"The “Preterist School” originated with the Jesuit Alcazar. His view was first put forth as a complete scheme in his work on the
Apocalypse, published in A. D. 1614. It limits the scope of the Apocalypse to the events of the Apostle John’s life, and affirms that the whole prophecy was fulfilled in the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus, and the subsequent fall of the persecuting Roman Empire, thus making the Emperor Nero the "Antichrist." The purpose of the scheme was transpdrent, it was to relieve the Papal Church from the stigma of being called the "Harlot Church" and the Pope from being called the "Antichrist." ...
The "Historical School," sometimes spoken of as the "Presentist" scheme, interprets the Apocalypse as a series of prophecies predicting the events that were to happen in the world and in the Church from John’s day to the end of time. The advocates of this School interpret the symbols of the Book of Revelation as referring to certain historical events that have and are happening in the world. They claim that "Antichrist" is a "System" rather than a "Person," and is represented by the Harlot Church of Rome. They interpret the "Time Element" in the Book on the "Year Day Scale." This School has had some very able and ingenious advocates.
This view, like the preceding was unknown to the early church. It appeared about the middle of the Twelfth Century, and was systematized in the beginning of the Thirteenth Century by the Abbot Joachim. Subsequently it was adopted and applied to the Pope by the forerunners and leaders of the Reformation, and may be said to have reached its zenith in Mr. Elliott’s "Horae Apocalypticae." It is frequently called the Protestant interpretation because it regards Popery as exhausting all that has been predicted of the Antichristian power. It was a powerful and formidable weapon in the hands of the leaders of the Reformation, and the conviction of its truthfulness nerved them to "love not their lives unto the death." It was the secret of the martyr heroism of the Sixteenth Century.
The "Futurist School" interprets the language of the Apocalypse "literally," except such symbols as are named as such, and holds that the whole of the Book, from the end of the third chapter, is yet "future" and unfulfilled, and that the greater part of the Book, from the beginning of chapter six to the end of chapter nineteen, describes what shall come to pass during the last week of "Daniel’s Seventy Weeks."
...In its present form it may be said to have originated at the end of the Sixteenth Century, with the Jesuit Ribera, who, actuated by the same motive as the Jesuit Alcazar, sought to rid the Papacy of the stigma of being called the "Antichrist," and so referred the prophecies of the Apocalypse to the distant future. This view was accepted by the Roman Catholic Church and was for a long time confined to it, but, strange to say, it has wonderfully revived since the beginning of the Nineteenth Century, and that among Protestants.
...The "Futurist" interpretation of scripture is the one employed in this book."
(Dispensational Truth, or God's Plan and Purpose in the Ages, By Clarence Larkin, 1918)
So Clarence Larkin is admitting that the school of thought that he follows came about to rid the Papacy of the stigma of being called the Anti-Christ. But I guess thats where the money was.
The gospel according ST Scofield was definitely a powerful influence, Oxford press opened its first publishers in the USA just to promote it. And if memory serves me well Moody then made sure that Bible was in every Bible collage and school in the USA.
I agree but that doesn't relate to the post of mine that you replied toAny time we see "dispensationalist" or "Darby" or "scofield" used to "prove" their case, it is best to skip whatever blather follows.
They can't open a bible to defend their position.
So one liners and attack the messenger gets pulled like a gunslinger. Then they blow the smoke off their finger, thinking they did something.
In Hosea, gomer never got official divorce paper.Oh yea, you tried a RT switcheroo alright.
But you failed. And it was conclusively proven that ALL of those Scriptural references indicate that in fact it is GOMER aka ISRAEL who will be redeemed, remarried, restored.
Key Terms and Action Verbs Used in Hosea
Betroth (’āraś): Hosea 2:19–20 uses this specific marital term three times: "I will betroth you to me forever... in righteousness and in justice, in steadfast love and in mercy. I will betroth you to me in faithfulness." This marks a total covenant re-establishment.
Love (‘āhab): Hosea 3:1 commands Hosea: "Go again, love a woman who is loved by another lover and is an adulteress, even as the Lord loves the children of Israel." God's primary action toward her is persistent, unmerited love.
Buy / Ransom / Redeem (kārāh / pādāh): Hosea 3:2 records Hosea physically purchasing Gomer out of servitude for 15 shekels of silver and a measure of barley—a direct act of redemption. God uses the explicit redeem/ransom vocabulary in Hosea 13:14: "I shall ransom (pādāh) them from the power of Sheol; I shall redeem (gā’al) them from Death."
Show Mercy / Pity (rāḥam): God reverses the prophetic judgment of Hosea's children's names to signal restoration: "I will have mercy on No Mercy [Lo-Ruhamah], and I will say to Not My People [Lo-Ammi], 'You are my people'" (Hosea 2:23).
Allure and Speak Comfortably (pātāh & dābar ‘al-lēb): Hosea 2:14 states, "I will allure her, and bring her into the wilderness, and speak tenderly to her"—drawing her away from her idols to restore her heart.
Heal (rāpā’): Hosea 14:4 describes spiritual restoration: "I will heal their apostasy; I will love them freely, for my anger has turned from them."
Purify / Remove: Purification is framed as removing temptation: "I will remove the names of the Baals from her mouth, and they shall be remembered by name no more" (Hosea 2:17).
Whisked away carrots ? has this thread now become a cookery lesson ?Yes talking tours in churches leaflets, booklets... it was all organized.
Imagine being taught you would be whisked away at some point, quite a powerful carrot!! LOL
YeahJames 4:7...we can resist the devil and he will flee from us. He may be strutting like a lion, but he's a pussy cat compared to the power that resides in any Christian.
So Clarence Larkin is admitting that the school of thought that he follows came about to rid the Papacy of the stigma of being called the Anti-Christ. But I guess thats where the money was.
Or he just saw where the money was - God only knowsThat thought hasn't changed much over the years concerning the Papacy.
Larkin may have been trying to defend them against being called, the Anti-Christ, but they aren't doing themselves any favors by denying many aspects of God's Word in practice and denying His Millennial Kingdom.
Or he just saw where the money was - God only knows
this is meant for those who are born againThere was an argument about Jesus re marry Israel.Because Jesus died, so Jesus can re marry adulteror.
Not true, Jesus as the innocent spouse, he can remarry after official biblical divorce.
However, the adulteror being divorced, can't remarry.
Luke 16
Deuteronomy 24
If a person is born again by holy spirit, a new person is free to marry. Hallelujah!!!
Maybe I am too cynicalHere's what I believe. If a Baptist pastor is trying to defend the Papacy, it's only because he's afraid that people will start to believe that the whole Christian religion is a farce. I don't think it has anything to do with money.
"The “Preterist School” originated with the Jesuit Alcazar. His view was first put forth as a complete scheme in his work on the
Apocalypse, published in A. D. 1614. It limits the scope of the Apocalypse to the events of the Apostle John’s life, and affirms that the whole prophecy was fulfilled in the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus, and the subsequent fall of the persecuting Roman Empire, thus making the Emperor Nero the "Antichrist." The purpose of the scheme was transparent, it was to relieve the Papal Church from the stigma of being called the "Harlot Church" and the Pope from being called the "Antichrist." ...
Correct.this is meant for those who are born again
“but I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery:
and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.”
Matthew 5:32 KJV
“They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away? He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so. And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.”
Matthew 19:7-9 KJV
this doctrine is for those who are born again
Yeah I don’t know what some of you do with what the bible actually says thoughThe condemnation of Satan is now gone thanks to Jesus.
There is no condemnation for those that are in Christ Jesus.
His accusation against the believers in Jesus are unfounded. We are a new creation in Christ.