-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
W
Is it bad? How does it affect anybody? I dont bash on atheists, I actually try to learn and understand them? So if this is a Christian site? Then Christians shouldn't go to none Christian sites?
Im partly a believer and I dont have a strong faith (maybe I dont even have faith) I can even say that Im not a believer of God? But I want to believe. Sometimes I only post things that may seem like I hate God but not because I honestly hating but because Im crying to God to give me a clue and actually believe, or how young children sometimes do bad things so our parents can notice us.
I dont find it offensive but as a christian you shouldnt be either sending people away because they are not christian nor forcing your christian ways onto others.. If I remember right as followers of Christ we should love everyone, and follow God, but that is my opinion and love means to love people even tho they are wrong in our belief system. Not really bashing on anybody. Just my opinion.
Sincerely Uriel.
Im partly a believer and I dont have a strong faith (maybe I dont even have faith) I can even say that Im not a believer of God? But I want to believe. Sometimes I only post things that may seem like I hate God but not because I honestly hating but because Im crying to God to give me a clue and actually believe, or how young children sometimes do bad things so our parents can notice us.
I dont find it offensive but as a christian you shouldnt be either sending people away because they are not christian nor forcing your christian ways onto others.. If I remember right as followers of Christ we should love everyone, and follow God, but that is my opinion and love means to love people even tho they are wrong in our belief system. Not really bashing on anybody. Just my opinion.
Sincerely Uriel.
BY THE GREEK GODS! Using this analogy, maybe I am just refusing to admit that bigfoot, aliens, and fairies exist. Perhaps I know the earth is flat and am just refusing to believe it because I have an interest in why people would believe in a flat earth.
I'm going to agree with you here. Your point was still clear and that is really all that matters when communicating.
I'm going to agree with you here. Your point was still clear and that is really all that matters when communicating.
S
That's actually a very funny conversation.....
Atheism. The belief that there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing, and then nothing magically exploded for no reason creating everything, and then a bunch of everything magically rearranged itself, for no reason what so ever, into self-replicating bits which then turned into dinosaurs ...........
makes perfect sense.
Atheism. The belief that there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing, and then nothing magically exploded for no reason creating everything, and then a bunch of everything magically rearranged itself, for no reason what so ever, into self-replicating bits which then turned into dinosaurs ...........
makes perfect sense.
A lot of atheists don't believe in a nothing.
But matter can be created and destroyed. It can be converted into energy. If we want to say that all of that is the same thing than it can still be created and destroyed and is observed to do so in the case of zero-point energy. The law of conservation of mass and energy does apply to most situation and it is a useful tool for explaining certain systems in reality, but not all systems. It doesn't work on the quantum scale and it doesn't apply to the scale of the universe which is noted in general relativity. This is actually highlighted now that it can be shown that the universe is an expanding system and therefore is not closed even in the strictest of senses.
The laws of nature are constructs that humans come up with in order to explain what they observe around them. If it is observed to happen on a very reliable bases than we often call the representation of these observations to be a law. However, the conversation of mass was come up with in the 18th century and since then we have found examples that break that law.
I still don't think the evidence has been presented that the universe needed a designer. However I will say that it stands to reason that any being believing in any originator can be right. But if their reasons are insufficient and tenets mutually exclusive I fail to deduce how I'm suppose to actually choose between whether or not the claims are true.
But matter can be created and destroyed. It can be converted into energy. If we want to say that all of that is the same thing than it can still be created and destroyed and is observed to do so in the case of zero-point energy. The law of conservation of mass and energy does apply to most situation and it is a useful tool for explaining certain systems in reality, but not all systems. It doesn't work on the quantum scale and it doesn't apply to the scale of the universe which is noted in general relativity. This is actually highlighted now that it can be shown that the universe is an expanding system and therefore is not closed even in the strictest of senses.
The laws of nature are constructs that humans come up with in order to explain what they observe around them. If it is observed to happen on a very reliable bases than we often call the representation of these observations to be a law. However, the conversation of mass was come up with in the 18th century and since then we have found examples that break that law.
I still don't think the evidence has been presented that the universe needed a designer. However I will say that it stands to reason that any being believing in any originator can be right. But if their reasons are insufficient and tenets mutually exclusive I fail to deduce how I'm suppose to actually choose between whether or not the claims are true.