Seventh Day Adventism
- Thread starter cenallen
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
i am.
you know very well SDA is a Masonic front, advancing the agenda.
you know very well White is a false prophetess, and you know her progeny and estate are busy purging her writings of conflicting and damaging documents...including the fact she denied the trinity, taught Arianism, and teaches unbiblical vegetarianism (a global agenda).
SDA theology is Judaized Legalism - Law-keeping dressed up as Grace-enabled 'obedience' - exactly as we are to expect in the final days. SDAs are in league with Kabbalistic jews.
SDA teachers, theologians and institutions are thoroughly corrupt and are advancing a wicked agenda. at the highest levels they are all FREEMASONS, and always have been.
want me to keep posting on it?
Adventist Freemason Hidden Hand Pose
Camp Meeting group at Reno; Front center with Bible in hand: Mrs. E. G. White; behind her: Sarah McEnterfer; on right, seated: J. N. Loughborough
master of the second veil.
The Kabbalah
The first veil of the negative existence is the AIN, Ain = Negativity. This word consists of three letters, which thus shadow forth the first three Sephiroth or numbers. The second veil is the AIN SVP, Ain Soph = the Limitless, This title consists of six letters, and shadows forth the idea of the first six Sephiroth or numbers. The third veil is the AIN SVP AVR, Ain Soph Aur = the Limitless Light.
Introduction - The Kabbalah Unveiled
you know very well SDA is a Masonic front, advancing the agenda.
you know very well White is a false prophetess, and you know her progeny and estate are busy purging her writings of conflicting and damaging documents...including the fact she denied the trinity, taught Arianism, and teaches unbiblical vegetarianism (a global agenda).
SDA theology is Judaized Legalism - Law-keeping dressed up as Grace-enabled 'obedience' - exactly as we are to expect in the final days. SDAs are in league with Kabbalistic jews.
SDA teachers, theologians and institutions are thoroughly corrupt and are advancing a wicked agenda. at the highest levels they are all FREEMASONS, and always have been.
want me to keep posting on it?
Adventist Freemason Hidden Hand Pose
Camp Meeting group at Reno; Front center with Bible in hand: Mrs. E. G. White; behind her: Sarah McEnterfer; on right, seated: J. N. Loughborough
master of the second veil.
The Kabbalah
The first veil of the negative existence is the AIN, Ain = Negativity. This word consists of three letters, which thus shadow forth the first three Sephiroth or numbers. The second veil is the AIN SVP, Ain Soph = the Limitless, This title consists of six letters, and shadows forth the idea of the first six Sephiroth or numbers. The third veil is the AIN SVP AVR, Ain Soph Aur = the Limitless Light.
Introduction - The Kabbalah Unveiled
Recounting her vision of December, 1844, Ellen speaks of her and Jesus as "In a moment we were winging our way upward…" Seeing this, in the light of her calling Him "Michael the Archangel" (Desire of Ages pp. 99, 379; Spiritual Gifts Vol. 1, p. 158; Prophets & Kings p. 572) one is led to question if she did not, in fact, really view Him as just that—an angel! And if so, what of His deity and bodily resurrection?
To make these aberrant views appear as Biblical, the SDA’s 1994 Clear Word Bible has changed the text to make Jesus Michael the Archangel in 1st Thessalonians 4:16; Revelation 12:7 and Jude 9; and to make Him to be a mighty angel in Revelation 10:1,5,8 & 10. This is because in her comments on Revelation chapters 1, 8, and 10, Ellen White identified these angels in Revelation as also being Jesus Christ! (SDA Commentary VII, 971+978; ms15, 1897; ms 59).
To make these aberrant views appear as Biblical, the SDA’s 1994 Clear Word Bible has changed the text to make Jesus Michael the Archangel in 1st Thessalonians 4:16; Revelation 12:7 and Jude 9; and to make Him to be a mighty angel in Revelation 10:1,5,8 & 10. This is because in her comments on Revelation chapters 1, 8, and 10, Ellen White identified these angels in Revelation as also being Jesus Christ! (SDA Commentary VII, 971+978; ms15, 1897; ms 59).
i'm posting FACTS.
but that doesn't sit right with you.
Jude 1:9
King James Bible - "Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee."
Clear Word Bible - "In contrast to these ungodly men is the Lord Jesus Christ, also called Michael, the archangel in charge of the entire angelic host. When He was challenged by Satan about His intentions to resurrect Moses, He didn't come against Satan with a blistering attack nor did he belittle him. He simply said, 'God rejects your claim to his body.'"
but that doesn't sit right with you.
Jude 1:9
King James Bible - "Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee."
Clear Word Bible - "In contrast to these ungodly men is the Lord Jesus Christ, also called Michael, the archangel in charge of the entire angelic host. When He was challenged by Satan about His intentions to resurrect Moses, He didn't come against Satan with a blistering attack nor did he belittle him. He simply said, 'God rejects your claim to his body.'"
G
Of course you can because that (the biblical spine of your doctrine) is the device used to keep you there. Don't you understand this? It was in the wilderness that satan attempted to stand on scripture. Clearly if satan has an agenda it is to use scripture to pervert the church and any would be believers.
3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.
4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.
5 For I suppose I was not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles.
6 But though I be rude in speech, yet not in knowledge; but we have been throughly made manifest among you in all things.
7 Have I committed an offence in abasing myself that ye might be exalted, because I have preached to you the gospel of God freely?
8 I robbed other churches, taking wages of them, to do you service.
9 And when I was present with you, and wanted, I was chargeable to no man: for that which was lacking to me the brethren which came from Macedonia supplied: and in all things I have kept myself from being burdensome unto you, and so will I keep myself.
10 As the truth of Christ is in me, no man shall stop me of this boasting in the regions of Achaia.
11 Wherefore? because I love you not? God knoweth.
12 But what I do, that I will do, that I may cut off occasion from them which desire occasion; that wherein they glory, they may be found even as we.
13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.
14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.
Again, I see this as a paternity issue you should take note of and, while I agree that there are many skewed indivdiuals who have been foundational in christian theological growth, you cannot deny that Ellen G. White has been called a "prophet" on this very thread by Lao. With this said I refer you to vs. 14-15 above in conjunction with other images and posts by jdiggs and cenallen. I ask you to consider if v.4 brings up cause to weigh whether SDA has in fact taught "another Jesus", especially when you consider key issues. For example, if a person makes a prediction about the return of Jesus Christ that doesn't come true, then clearly, this was "another Jesus".
As for me, my faith is found in vs. 3, for the simplicity of Christ is all I need. Outlandish visions and predictions reek of human sin and the masquerader, and I get enough of that when I look in the mirror. I am calling for discernment from those caught in a net designed to keep them there...and I have prayed about my own intentions and light of Jesus Christ shining freedom for those caught within.
3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.
4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.
5 For I suppose I was not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles.
6 But though I be rude in speech, yet not in knowledge; but we have been throughly made manifest among you in all things.
7 Have I committed an offence in abasing myself that ye might be exalted, because I have preached to you the gospel of God freely?
8 I robbed other churches, taking wages of them, to do you service.
9 And when I was present with you, and wanted, I was chargeable to no man: for that which was lacking to me the brethren which came from Macedonia supplied: and in all things I have kept myself from being burdensome unto you, and so will I keep myself.
10 As the truth of Christ is in me, no man shall stop me of this boasting in the regions of Achaia.
11 Wherefore? because I love you not? God knoweth.
12 But what I do, that I will do, that I may cut off occasion from them which desire occasion; that wherein they glory, they may be found even as we.
13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.
14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.
Again, I see this as a paternity issue you should take note of and, while I agree that there are many skewed indivdiuals who have been foundational in christian theological growth, you cannot deny that Ellen G. White has been called a "prophet" on this very thread by Lao. With this said I refer you to vs. 14-15 above in conjunction with other images and posts by jdiggs and cenallen. I ask you to consider if v.4 brings up cause to weigh whether SDA has in fact taught "another Jesus", especially when you consider key issues. For example, if a person makes a prediction about the return of Jesus Christ that doesn't come true, then clearly, this was "another Jesus".
As for me, my faith is found in vs. 3, for the simplicity of Christ is all I need. Outlandish visions and predictions reek of human sin and the masquerader, and I get enough of that when I look in the mirror. I am calling for discernment from those caught in a net designed to keep them there...and I have prayed about my own intentions and light of Jesus Christ shining freedom for those caught within.
It is my undersatnding-according to scripture that a person must recognise/believe that Christ is the son of God, he died on the cross for their sin, and that they must repent of their sin and ask him into their lives as Lord and Saviour. That is the requirement of salvation.
I have only read briefly of the authors views on this thread, but from what I have read he would appear to agree with that. I also know nothing of Seventh Day Adventists beliefs, apart from the few posts (not all) I have read on this thread.
But man-unfortunately demands that others believe according to his particular 'box' his or her particular denominational belief for salvation. I wonder if many will be amazed when they get to Heaven, to find who is also there
I have only read briefly of the authors views on this thread, but from what I have read he would appear to agree with that. I also know nothing of Seventh Day Adventists beliefs, apart from the few posts (not all) I have read on this thread.
But man-unfortunately demands that others believe according to his particular 'box' his or her particular denominational belief for salvation. I wonder if many will be amazed when they get to Heaven, to find who is also there