I love how all these people stuck on the religious doctrines and traditions of men, keep erecting beautiful straw men with such perfection, only to knock them down with the same perfection. It really is quite a skill.
Seriously, who teaches that a Christian can live in willful sin and still be considered a Christian? It's such a straw man in the first place.
These religious teachers of men, who are stuck in their denominational spirits end up putting people in further bondage and guilt when they misrepresent assurance by constructing such a straw man in the first place.
But I guess that's to be expected from denominational, religious teachers who are threatened by grace. The same people constructed false straw men about grace in Paul's day. He of course shot down such straw men by showing that faith and grace of course isn't a license to sin.
Romans 6 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? 2 Certainly not! How shall we who died to sin live any longer in it? 3 Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? 4 Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
It's time for people to drop their religious denominational spirits and traditions of men, and allow believers to walk in the full assurance Jesus provides. Quit constructing straw men that portray a false assertion about a very real thing.
I agree with you completely , but he also let's us know that seeking after righteousness is a struggle and we can never be completely sinless. I have seen a lot of people turned away because they get the idea on the other extreme. It's not that we can continue in sin, but they get the idea that we have to be completely and utterly sinless, and this just isn't possible. It's always a struggle.
Romans 7
14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.
17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
I agree though that we can't continue in willful sin, but we will struggle, especially at first, to break away from the bondage of it. When I turned my eyes on Christ, hundreds of strongholds I was trapped by were destroyed, but there were some residual sins that I still struggle with. Coming to Christ doesn't mean instant perfection and this is a misconception with a lot of non-believers, that sin must be completely eradicated instantly.
I see two extremes. Those who teach that willful sin is ok because all we have to do is ask for forgiveness, then the same sin is repeated, and it turns into this cycle that people call "repentance". But this isn't true repentance. At the other extreme, some people teach, or come off as teaching, any sin at all is a sign of non-salvation or non-regeneration, and this is also not true.