C
Hello cfultz3,
That's a matter of context. Obviously, Jehovah God often is called such, but this doesn't mean that Sarah was equating Abraham with Jehovah by "calling him 'lord,'" and neither was Peter implying that Christian wives should have rival "lords" to Jesus Christ by featuring Sarah as an example for them to follow. (1 Peter 3:5-6)
Jehovah God installed Jesus as the "Lord", or Master, for all Christians. This unique assignment is for a purpose however, "For [Jesus] must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death...When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all." (1 Cor. 15:25-26, 28)
That's a matter of context. Obviously, Jehovah God often is called such, but this doesn't mean that Sarah was equating Abraham with Jehovah by "calling him 'lord,'" and neither was Peter implying that Christian wives should have rival "lords" to Jesus Christ by featuring Sarah as an example for them to follow. (1 Peter 3:5-6)
Jehovah God installed Jesus as the "Lord", or Master, for all Christians. This unique assignment is for a purpose however, "For [Jesus] must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death...When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all." (1 Cor. 15:25-26, 28)
I won't debate this with you because, as I have learned, no good can come out of debating two opposite ends. Also understand that you are saying that Jesus is a temportary Lord, and will point you back to my first post you responded to.
When that time comes, shall the Word cease from being the Word? Shall our High Priest cease from being our High Priest, the Son from being the Son, the Lamb from being the Lamb, etc.....? Nay, I say. He is Lord of lords, and King of kings and His throne shall abide into the Age of all ages.