G
Why in the world is there even a link in the "people who like" list in a post?????????????????????????
The list "wraps", doesn't it?
(...and # others like this.)
And, if it just has to be
- why only three people listed - and then you have to click the link to "open up" the list of [as little as] one more name? Why not have the first 7 or 10 people listed initially? You could at least have 5! There is room for them. But, three???
"This is totally and utterly 'stupid' and 'useless'..."
I am "utterly sick" of the whole world being caught up in the idea that:
"We want to know every little nuance about people's choices - so we are going to make them 'click click click click click' every little [unnecessary] thing so we can collect and know this information..."
("Have you ever noticed this, out on the internet?")
This is "New World Order" thinking - not "Faith in Christ" thinking.
As Christians - are we going to let ourselves get caught up in this ungodly practice? Or, should we be willing to trust our brethren as far as allowing them the benefit of what is 'natural' and 'expedient' and 'convenient' (for everyone's sake)??? And, don't we want this site to "operate" as efficiently as possible for the membership?
And don't go quoting me scripture. There is nothing wrong with 'natural' and 'expedient' and 'convenient' when it is conducive to a more peaceful frame of mind.
There is no reason in the entire universe why anyone should have to click a link to see the rest of the names in the list...
(Especially for just one more name.)
The absence of subconscious 'kaos' is worth-while in-of-itself.
I have no problem whatsoever with having the 'like' list in the post, however:
The full list should be displayed initially, without a link at all - even if there are 100 names in it.
/rant over.
.
The list "wraps", doesn't it?
(...and # others like this.)
And, if it just has to be
- why only three people listed - and then you have to click the link to "open up" the list of [as little as] one more name? Why not have the first 7 or 10 people listed initially? You could at least have 5! There is room for them. But, three???"This is totally and utterly 'stupid' and 'useless'..."
I am "utterly sick" of the whole world being caught up in the idea that:
"We want to know every little nuance about people's choices - so we are going to make them 'click click click click click' every little [unnecessary] thing so we can collect and know this information..."
("Have you ever noticed this, out on the internet?")
This is "New World Order" thinking - not "Faith in Christ" thinking.
As Christians - are we going to let ourselves get caught up in this ungodly practice? Or, should we be willing to trust our brethren as far as allowing them the benefit of what is 'natural' and 'expedient' and 'convenient' (for everyone's sake)??? And, don't we want this site to "operate" as efficiently as possible for the membership?
And don't go quoting me scripture. There is nothing wrong with 'natural' and 'expedient' and 'convenient' when it is conducive to a more peaceful frame of mind.
There is no reason in the entire universe why anyone should have to click a link to see the rest of the names in the list...
(Especially for just one more name.)
The absence of subconscious 'kaos' is worth-while in-of-itself.
I have no problem whatsoever with having the 'like' list in the post, however:
The full list should be displayed initially, without a link at all - even if there are 100 names in it.
/rant over.
.
Last edited:
