T
I really don’t know what your problem is, nor why you are so vindictive towards me. Your contradictions are baffling.
My problem is that you are twisting my words and lying about what I am saying. If you are doing so accidentally, because you don't understand what I am saying, then I can forgive you and we can move on. I have given you 4 chances to admit to this error, and you have rejected every last one of them. I am being forced to conclude that you are lying willfully, and I just don't understand why.
I’m not the only person on this thread who has criticised Obama.
A previous poster said “Barack Obama's religion is ultimately Barack Obama.” So according to this statement he’s not a Christian then. You actually added a ‘like’ to his post. Why is that? Please explain.
Obama is a sinner. This is obvious, and something I have been saying from the start. The fact that he is a sinner does not bar him from membership in the Church of Christ. If it did, there would be NO Christians. Not you, not me, no one but Jesus himself would be eligible for that clique.
Initially, when you said that Obama was not a Christian, I thought that you just didn't know better -- that you had been hood-winked into the lies that are going around about him being Muslim (and they are lies .... he is not Muslim). Therefore, I sought to correct you, pointing out that in fact he is Christian, which in fact means that he should know better, and that, at least in my opinion, his actions are even more deplorable. But you seem to think that for some reason his sins bar him from being a Christian, while yours do not. That is ludicrous. And you have given no defense of your lunacy; you have only repeated it.
So far you've accused me of not behaving like a Christian, playing the fool, now you call me a troll, and finally, when I give an answer that you don’t like, you accuse me of not reading your posts!
I accused you of not reading my posts first, not last. That was my first hunch as to why you were so off-base on your comments; I was hoping you just hadn't read what I wrote, and that if you had only taken the time to read it, you would have realized what I was saying.
When that didn't work, I tried to come up with other theories as to why you might be misunderstanding me. Proving every theory wrong, you are bound and determined to leave myself and every other reader of this thread with only one choice: you are a troll.
I would love to have another option, but your most recent case of revisionist history has given me none.
I apologize to the rest of the board for feeding this troll, and will try to sit on my hands rather than feed it any further.